, 2003, 13(6), 243–244
logue 6 from compound 4 was carried out only under special
conditions: the heating of 4 in an AcOH–AcONa mixture
followed by acidic hydrolysis.6
NH2
PO2H2
Cl
Me
S
Note that S-adenosylhomocysteamine, which is free of the
COOH group, appeares to be more stable than Met(Ado).11
Therefore, different stability and ways of degradation of sulfo-
nium salts 1 and 4, as compared to their carboxylic prototypes,
may be explained by the low reactivity of the mesomeric phos-
phinic anion in intramolecular alkylation. The transformations
of this anion into ethers in case of aminoalkylphosphinates
were carried out only by methylation with diazomethane.12
Thus, the decomposition of sulfonium salts 1 and 4 proceeds
without the participation of acidic moieties of the molecules.
The stability of compounds 3 and 5 may be explained similarly.
Thus, the acidic phosphorus-containing group in the test ana-
logues of natural sulfonium compounds is capable not only to
carry out an ‘anchor’ function while binding to target enzymes,
likewise the carboxyl group, but also to increase considerably
the stability of the analogues, including the stability to the action
of Met(Ado) catabolic enzymes.
Ado
1
pH 4.5
MeS
PO2H2
AdoS
PO2H2
NH2
NH2
2
7
HO
PO2H2
NH2
6
Scheme 3
sulfide only upon heating in neutral and alkaline solutions10
(according to our data, kH 1.65×10–3 s–1 at 100 °C in 0.5 M
NaOH). Under these conditions, organophosphorus analogue 4
and 1-amino-3-(dimethylthionia)propylphosphonic acid iodide
5 were also found to be more stable (kH 0.3×10–4 or 1.1×10–4 s–1,
respectively), while the main product of the transformation of
compound 4 is methionine analogue 2, whereas acid 5 gave a
multicomponent mixture.†† The synthesis of homoserine ana-
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic
Research (grant no. 03-04-48949) and a grant for Scientific
School no. 1800-2003.4.
References
‡
1
2
3
R. T. Borchardt, in Enzymatic Basis of Detoxification, ed. W. B. Jakoby,
Academic Press, New York, 1980, vol. 2, p. 43.
V. I. Syrku, L. L. Zavalova and R. M. Khomutov, Bioorg. Khim., 1986,
12, 839 (in Russian).
R. M. Khomutov, Yu. N. Zhukov, A. R. Khomutov, E. N. Khurs, D. L.
Kramer, J. T. Miller and K. V. Porter, Bioorg. Khim., 2000, 26, 718
(Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem., 2000, 26, 647).
Yu. N. Zhukov, A. R. Khomutov, T. I. Osipova and R. M. Khomutov,
Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Khim., 1999, 1360 (Russ. Chem. Bull., 1999, 48,
1348).
K. V. Alferov, Yu. N. Zhukov, E. N. Khurs, T. I. Osipova and R. M.
Khomutov, Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Khim., 2001, 303 (Russ. Chem. Bull.,
Int. Ed., 2001, 50, 316).
A 10% solution of I2 in EtOH was added dropwise with stirring to a
mixture of acid 1 (100 mg, 0.22 mmol), aqueous 0.5 M HI (2 ml) and
EtOH (1 ml) until a weak yellow colour was retained for 2–3 min. The
reaction mixture was lyophilised; the residue was dissolved in water,
applied onto FN-18 paper and chromatographed in the BunOH–AcOH–
H2O system (12:3:5). The strip of paper containing acid 3 was cut out
and eluted with water; the eluate was concentrated in vacuo to dryness.
The residue was dried in vacuo over P2O5 to give compound 3 (64%,
69 mg): mp 168 °C, Rf 0.03 (PriOH–25% NH4OH–H2O, 7:1:2); Rf 0.03
(BunOH–AcOH–H2O, 12:3:5). 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O) d: 2.02 (s,
3H, MeCOO–), 2.07–2.54 (m, 2H, CH2CH), 2.99 (s, 3H, MeS+), 3.13–
3.30 (m, 1H, CHCH2), 3.45–3.72 (m, 2H, +SCH2CH2), 3.84–3.99 (m,
2H, 5'-CH2S+), 6.04 (d, 1H, H-1', J 4.7 Hz), 8.24 and 8.26 (2s, 1H, H-2
and 1H, H-8).
4
5
6
§
A solution of acid 1 (31 mg, 0.068 mmol) in 2 ml of a 0.05 M sodium
7
8
9
J. L. Hoffman, Biochemistry, 1986, 25, 4444.
acetate buffer (pH 4.5) was boiled for 5 h. The quantitative deter-
mination of acid 1 was performed by TLC.9 At known time intervals,
aliquot portions of the reaction mixture were applied to a Silufol plate.
The plate was developed by using BunOH–AcOH–H2O (12:3:5) and/or
PriOH–25% NH4OH–H2O (7:1:2), dried and treated with a ninhydrin
solution. Spots giving positive ninhydrin reactions were cut and extracted
with a 0.5% CdCl2 solution in 50% ethanol, and the absorbance of the
extracts was determined at 505 nm. To construct the calibration curve,
aliquot portions of an authentic 1 solution were subjected to the same
treatment. The identity of the products of decomposition with authentic
2, 6 and 7 was shown by TLC on a Silufol plate developed by the upper
layer of the BunOH–AcOH–H2O (12:3:5) and PriOH–25% NH4OH–H2O
(7:1:2) systems. Spots were visualised by UV and colour reactions with
ninhydrin and ammonium molybdate.
S. K. Shapiro and A. N. Hather, J. Biol. Chem., 1958, 233, 631.
N. G. Faleev, Y. N. Zhukov, E. N. Khurs, O. I. Gogoleva, M. V. Barbolina,
N. P. Bazhulina, V. M. Belikov, T. V. Demidkina and R. M. Khomutov,
Eur. J. Biochem., 2000, 267, 6897.
10 V. N. Bukin and G. N. Khuchua, in Vitamin U (S-metilmetionin):
priroda, svoistva, primenenie [Vitamin U (S-methylmethionine): Origin,
Properties, Applications], eds. V. N. Bukin and V. E. Anisimov, Nauka,
Moscow, 1973, p. 10 (in Russian).
11 V. Zappia, P. Galletti, A. Oliva and A. Santis, Anal. Biochem., 1977,
79, 535.
12 P. P. Gianousis and P. A. Bartlett, J. Med. Chem., 1987, 30, 1603.
The rate constants kH were obtained by fitting the data (concentrations
of acid 1 vs. time) to the rate equation of a first-order reaction.
Taking into account a considerable difference in the decomposition
rates for Met(Ado) and 1 and according to published data,7,11 we
assumed that the rate constants of hydrolysis of diastereomers of 1 are
equal.
Received: 2nd October 2003; Com. 03/2182
†† The solutions of S-methylmethionine and acids 4 and 5 (40 mg) in an
aqueous 0.5 M NaOH solution were boiled for 6 h. The quantitative
determination of S-methylmethionine and acids 4 and 5 and the identi-
fication of decomposition products with authentic homoserine, com-
pounds 2 and 6, were carried out as described above.
¶
A solution of acid 1 (20 mg, 0.04 mmol) in 0.7 ml of a 0.2 M
deuterated potassium phosphate buffer (pD 7.1) was incubated at 37 °C
for 144 h. 1H NMR spectra were recorded at known time intervals.
– 244 –