C. Dardonville et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 491–493
493
Regarding m-opioid receptor, all the molecules bound
with affinities in the nanomolar range (Table 1). One
compound (3e, Ki=37 nM) was roughly equipotent with
5e (Ki=23 nM), two molecules (1e,4e) showed lower
affinity whereas 2e (Ki=1.04 nM) was an excellent m-
opioid ligand with a binding affinity comparable to that
of fentanyl (2.9 nM).
4. Boronat, M. A.; Olmos, G.; Garcia-Sevilla, J. A. Br. J.
Pharmacol. 1998, 125, 175.
5. Ruiz-Durantez, E.; Torrecilla, M.; Pineda, J.; Ugedo, L.
Br. J. Pharmacol. 2003, 138, 494.
6. Reis, D. J.; Regunathan, S. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2000,
21, 187.
7. Morgan, A. D.; Campbell, U. C.; Fons, R. D.; Carroll,
M. E. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2002, 72, 873.
8. Aricioglu-Kartal, F.; Regunathan, S. Life Sci. 2002, 71,
1695.
9. Essawi, M. Y. H. Bull. Fac. Pharm. (Cairo Univ.) 1990,
28, 11.
10. Montero, A.; Goya, P.; Jagerovic, N.; Callado, L. F.;
Meana, J. J.; Giron, R.; Goicoechea, C.; Martin, M. I.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 1009.
With respect to the spacer chain length, these results
showed that the best m-opioid ligand was obtained with
six methylene units (2e, m=6) whereas either increasing
(m=8, 12) or decreasing (m=2, 3) the length of the
spacer affords less potent molecules. This observation
would need confirmation by the assay of more spacers
of different lengths (e.g., m=4, 5, 7, 9).
11. Dardonville, C.; Rozas, I.; Callado, L. F.; Meana, J. J.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 1525.
12. Using only 1.5 equiv of propionic anhydride and DMAP
cat. made the purification easier than the method pre-
viously described.
13. Poss, M. A.; Iwanowicz, E.; Reid, J. A.; Lin, J.; Gu, Z.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 5933.
To conclude, we have reported a new series of N-[1-(2-
phenethyl)-4-piperidyl]-N-(guanidinoalkyl)propanamide
hybrid molecules with improved affinity for the I2-IBS
and m-opioid receptor compared to the prototype 5e.
14. Spectroscopic data: 1e. (2TFA): NMR (400 MHz, D2O/
CD3OD) 1H d ppm 7.3–7.1 (m, 5H); 4.0–3.8 (m, 1H); 3.55
(m, 2H); 3.35 (m, 1H); 3.2 (br m, 4H); 3.12 (br m, 1H);
3.05–2.85 (m, 4H); 2.33 (m, 2H); 2.25–2.0 (m, 1H); 1.95–
1.75 (m, 3H); 0.88 (m, 3H); 13C d ppm 178.3; 157.2; 136.2;
129.2; 128.9; 127.5; 57.8; 52.5; 52.0; 40.4; 39.7; 30.0; 27.4;
26.7; 9.0; ES+MS m/z 346 [M+H]; 173.6 [(M+2H),
100%]. 2e. (2TFA): NMR (400 MHz, D2O) 1H d ppm
7.63–7.49 (m, 5H); 4.45 (m, 0.6H); 4.30 (m, 0.4H); 3.91 (br
m, 2H); 3.56 (m, 2H); 3.45 (t, 2H); 3.35 (m, 3H); 3.27 (m,
3H); 2.67 (q, 1H, J=7.5 Hz); 2.60 (q, 1H, J=7.5 Hz);
2.46–2.1 (m, 4H); 1.77 (br m, 3H); 1.68 (m, 1H); 1.54 (br
m, 4H); 1.27 (m, 3H); 13C d ppm 178.3 (s); 177.7 (s); 157.7
(s); 137.17 (s); 137.1 (s); 130.0 (d); 129.7 (d); 128.3 (d);
58.6 (d); 53.4 (d); 53.1 (d); 53.0 (d); 52.0 (t); 46.3 (d); 42.8
(d); 42.0 (d); 30.9 (t); 30.8 (t); 29.5 (t); 28.9 (t); 28.8 (t);
28.4 (t); 27.7 (t); 27.6 (t); 27.4 (t); 26.9 (t); 26.6 (t); 10.1 (q);
10.0 (q); ES+MS m/z 402.5 [M+H]; 201.9 [(M+2H),
100%]. 3e. (2TFA): NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) 1H d ppm
7.3–7.1 (m, 5H); 4.2(br m, 0.5H); 4.0 (br m, 0.5H); 3.61
(br d, 2H); 3.3–2.85 (m, 10H); 2.43–2.0 (m, 4H); 1.85 (br t,
2H); 1.5 (br m, 4H); 1.27 (br m, 8H); 1.01 (br t, 3H,
J=7.3 Hz); 13C d ppm 177.0 (s); 176.3 (s); 163.8 (s); 163.3
(s); 138.0 (s); 130.4 (d); 130.2(d); 128.7 (d); 59.4 (d); 54.0
(d); 53.6 (t); 52.7 (t); 46.9 (t); 43.5 (t); 42.8 (t); 32.4 (t); 31.9
(t); 30.9 (t); 30.65 (t); 30.60 (t); 30.5 (t); 30.2(t); 29.3 (t);
28.5 (t); 28.3 (t); 28.27 (t); 28.05 (t); 27.97 (t); 10.4 (q);
ES+MS m/z 430.5 [M+H]; 215.9 [(M+2H), 100%]. 4e.
This study showed that the incorporation in a same
molecule of m-opioid and I2-IBS pharmacophoric moi-
eties (i.e., fentanyl and alkylguanidine respectively),
linked by a methylene spacer, led to a synergistic effect
for the binding to both receptors. The modulation of
the affinity for both receptors by modification of the
length of the methylene spacer between the two phar-
macophoric moieties afforded two hybrid compounds
(1e and 3e) with balanced I2/m affinity, a 400-fold m-
opioid selective compound (2e) and a 80-fold I2-IBS
selective compound (4e). The in vitro and in vivo func-
tional activity of these new dual acting drugs is cur-
rently being evaluated and will be reported elsewhere.
Finally, these results are relevant in the field of IBS
since they further demonstrate that aliphatic alkane-
guanidines can afford high-affinity ligands for the I2-
IBS.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Spanish Grant SAF00-
0114-C02and the Basque Government (INTEK-
ER02ME04). C.D. is recipient of a postdoctoral fellow-
ship from the Spanish Ministerio de Educacion Cultura
y Deporte (SB2001-0174). We thank the staff members
of the Instituto Vasco de Medicina Legal for their
cooperation in the study.
1
(2TFA): NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) H d ppm 7.55–7.43
(m, 5H); 4.49 (br t, 0.6H); 4.32(m, 0.4H); 3.91 (br m, 2H);
3.6–3.2(m, 10H); 2.67 (q, 0.8H, J=7.3 Hz); 2.58 (q, 1.2H,
J=7.3 Hz); 2.47 (br q, 1.2H); 2.37 (br q, 0.8H); 2.19 (br d,
0.8H); 2.13 (br d, 1.2H); 1.81–1.65 (m, 4H); 1.6–1.4 (br m,
16H); 1.30 (td, 3H, J=7.3 Hz); 13C d ppm 177.2; 176.5;
158.8; 137.8; 130.2; 130.1; 128.5; 59.3; 53.8; 53.4; 52.5;
46.7; 43.4; 42.7; 32.2; 31.7; 30.9; 30.8; 30.6; 30.53; 30.48;
30.0; 29.1; 28.4; 28.13; 27.97; 27.87; 10.43; 10.38; ES+MS
m/z 486.5 [M+H]; 243.9 [(M+2H), 100%].
References and notes
1. Boronat, M. A.; Olmos, G.; Garcia-Sevilla, J. A. Ann. N. Y.
Acad. Sci. 1999, 881, 359.
2. Fairbanks, C. A.; Posthumus, I. J.; Kitto, K. F.; Stone,
L. S.; Wilcox, G. L. Pain 2000, 84, 13.
15. Miralles, A.; Olmos, G.; Sastre, M.; Barturen, F.; Martin,
I.; Garcia-Sevilla, J. A. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1993,
264, 1187.
3. Sanchez-Blazquez, P.; Boronat, M. A.; Olmos, G.; Gar-
cia-Sevilla, J. A.; Garzon, J. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2000, 130,
146.
16. Gabilondo, A. M.; Meana, J. J.; Barturen, F.; Sastre, M.;
Garcia-Sevilla, J. A. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1994,
115, 135.