Identification of Aminopyrimidine Regioisomers
1081
R3
N
R1
higher temperatures occurred over a narrower range than in
CDCl3. In our attempts to explore our hypothesis, detailed
conformational analysis using Spartan 02 on regioisomers
22 and 23 was conducted. We believed that this would aid in
explaining the line broadening observed.§
2
N
5
Substituents
on C2 induce
no line broadening
4
R2
Primary substituents
on C4 induce line
broadening at C5
As illustrated in Fig. 2, regioisomer 22, which did not
exhibit line broadening, has fewer distinct conformations
(Fig. 2, top) than 23, which displays significant line broad-
ening (Fig. 2, bottom). There was only a small difference
between the calculated maximum and minimum energy con-
formers (approx. 7 kJ mol−1) of 22. In each conformation
the amine N H bond was calculated to be in the plane of the
pyrimidine ring, while the rest of the alkyl chain exhibited
substantial variation between each conformation.
R
R
R
1 ϭ SCH3, CH3, or amine
2 ϭ Cl or amine
3 ϭ CH3, Cl, or amine
Scheme 1. Requirements for line broadening with amino-substituted
pyrimidines.
A previous structural and conformational study of large
substituted triazines with allylamine and piperazine func-
tional groups observed line broadening effects analogous to
that observed in the pyrimidines.[14,15] Restricted rotation of
the Ar N bond was observed at room temperature in the
1H, 13C, and 15N NMR spectra. In contrast to the pyrim-
idines, 13C NMR line broadening was only observed from
the α-carbon of the amine substituent. Line broadening was
also observed from the 15N NMR spectrum at N3 and N5.
These nitrogens in the triazine ring are spatially analogous
to C5 of the pyrimidine ring and the results were in par-
allel to our line broadening observations in the 13C NMR
spectrum. Coupled with crystal structures of the mono- and
bis-methanesulfonates, it was determined that the line broad-
ening was a result of the equilibrium between two (or more)
rotamer conformations.[14,15]
As with other rotameric studies, variation of temperature
(up or down) affected NMR peak shape. The most signifi-
cant changes were observed in the 13C NMR spectrum for
the C5 peak. Broad doublets indicating a high- and low-
energy conformation were often observed at temperatures
below 298 K (Fig. 1a). At 313 K almost all the compounds
examined had passed the coalescence temperature (Tc)‡ and
exhibited a sharp peak due to the averaged environment. Only
large amine substituents induced 13C NMR line broadening
of the α-carbon of the amine substituent, but resolution into
two peaks was never observed over the temperature range
available (8–11, 17, 35, 36). A small degree of line broad-
ening was occasionally observed from C4 and C6 of the
pyrimidine ring.
The energy difference of 20 kJ mol−1 between the highest
and lowest energy conformers of 23 represents a reasonable
barrier to rotation at the temperatures over which line broad-
ening is observed. While more conformers were calculated,
they could be classified into three sets with distinctive fea-
tures. The high-energy conformers (11–14) always oriented
the amine N–H towards CH(5) and in the same plane as the
aryl ring (Fig. 2b, bottom). The low-energy conformers (1–5)
have the amine N–H oriented away from CH(5) and the
α-carbon of the amine in close proximity (Fig. 2a, bot-
tom).All other conformations orient the N–H towards CH(5),
though slightly out of plane with the aryl ring, with large dif-
ferences in the orientation of the alkyl chain. The relative
populations of each of the conformations enabling a clearer
picture of conformational mobility could not be calculated
within the program.
Primary aniline derivatives [e.g., 2,4,6-trichloroaniline
(2,4,6-TCA) 39] do not exhibit line broadening at room tem-
perature. This is explained by observations of a preferred
stable orthogonal orientation of the aryl ring of the aniline to
the plane of the pyrimidine ring.[16] Conformer distribution
calculations of 39 (data not shown) resulted in a 1.8 kJ mol−1
difference in energy between the highest and lowest energy
conformer. In all conformations the aniline ring was orthog-
onal to the pyrimidine ring; this provided a strong argument
to the previously reported single preferred conformation.
Analysis of the conformations calculated by Spartan 02
revealed that the high- and low-energy conformations
were analogous to the triazine crystal structures previously
reported.[14,15] The key difference, we propose, is that it is
the interactions between CH(5) of the pyrimidine ring and
the N–H group and α-carbon of the amine substituent that
induces the line broadening observed. Spartan 02 was able
to calculate bond lengths and angles with a high degree of
accuracy at high levels of theory, especially for relatively
simple compounds such as our set of pyrimidines. Calcu-
lated hydrogen distances between the highest and lowest
There was also a strong contribution to the rotamer equi-
librium by a C2 or C6 methyl (or SMe) substitution in our
compound set. Simple H substitution at C2 (10, 11) resulted
in coalescence temperatures that were significantly lower
(<283 K) than all other derivatives. Changing the solvent to
(CD3)2SO (Fig. 1b), using 4 as a model compound, signifi-
cantly perturbed the system so that an increased Tc of C5 was
observed. Additionally, the two C5 peaks at low temperature
were well resolved, and conversion into one sharp peak at
‡ Coalescence temperature, for the purpose of qualitative analysis, is reported as the temperature at which coalescence is actually observed; that is, a very
low, broad baseline hump is observed. Alternatively, Tc is estimated by extrapolating between the two measurements at which it occurred.
§ Compounds were geometry-optimized using the Møller–Plesset function at MP2 level of theory. Conformer distributions were calculated using molecular
mechanics at the MMFF level of theory. Compounds were rotated by 30◦ increments for all available torsion points of the C(aryl)–N bond of the amine
substituent. The program allowed for a maximum of 20000 conformations and a maximum ꢀE of 100 kJ mol−1 difference. Conformations that had similar
energies and van der Waals overlap were treated as identical by the programme, which reduced the set of ‘unique’ conformers reported. Each conformer can
be regarded as representative of a number of conformations with the same energy and similar structural space.