B. Luangon et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 75 (2012) 80–85
85
4. Conclusions
[2] C. Mateo, J.M. Palomo, G.F. Lorente, J.M. Guisan, R.M. Lafuente, Enzyme Microb.
Technol. 40 (2007) 1451.
[3] A. Macario, M. Moliner, A. Corma, G. Giordano, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 118
(2009) 334.
[4] T. Yamamoto, T. Nishimura, T. Suzuki, H. Tamon, Drying Technol. 19 (2001)
1319.
[5] S.R. Mukai, H. Nishihara, T. Yoshida, K.-I. Taniguchi, H. Tamon, Carbon 43 (2005)
1563.
[6] A.G. Kumar, S. Swarnalatha, P. Kamatchi, R. Kirubagaran, K. Perinmbam, G.
Sekaran, J. Porous Mater. 16 (2009) 439.
[7] L. Huang, Z.M. Cheng, J. Chem. Eng. 144 (2008) 103.
[8] J.M. Palomo, G. Mun˜oz, G. Fernández-Lorente, C. Mateo, R. Fernández-Lafuente,
J.M. Guisán, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 19–20 (2002) 279.
[9] N. Dizge, C. Aydiner, D.Y. Imer, M. Bayramoglu, A. Tanriseven, B. Keskinler,
Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2008) 1983.
[10] M. Quirós, A.B. García, M.A. Montes-Morán, Carbon 49 (2011) 406.
[11] J. Ma, L. Zhang, Z. Liang, W. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Anal. Chim. Acta 632 (2009) 1.
[12] F. Svec, C.G. Huber, Anal. Chem. 1 (2006) 2101.
[13] M. Kato, K. Inuzuka, K. Sakai-Kato, T. Toyo’oka, Anal. Chem. 77 (2005) 1813.
[14] F.C. Leinweber, U. Tallarck, J. Chromatogr. A 1006 (2003) 207.
[15] T. Ikegami, N. Tanaka, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8 (2004) 527.
[16] T. Fuchigami, M. Toki, K. Nakanishi, J. Sol–Gel Sci. Technol. 19 (2000) 337.
[17] S.X. Chen, X. Zhang, P.K. Shen, Electrochem. Commun. 8 (2006) 713.
[18] T. Chaijitrsakool, N. Tonanon, W. Tanthapanichakoon, H. Tamon, S. Prichanont,
J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 55 (2008) 137.
Hierarchical micro-/macroporous carbon monolith is success-
fully used as a support for immobilized C. rugosa lipase by
flow-through method. Flowing of lipase solution through the
micro-/macroporous carbon monolith support is completed within
10 min of the immobilization process resulting from high mass
transfer and low diffusion resistance of macropores, thus enzyme
rapidly access into the surface inside the hierarchical porous car-
bon monolith support. Moreover, the flow rate of enzyme solution
and oxygenated surface are a dominant factor. The activity of
immobilized lipase on ACM and OCM columns is improved with
an increasing flow rate of enzyme solution. In addition, the flow
rate of enzyme solution in ACM column does not have significant
effect on protein binding, but the protein binding on OCM column
is developed at low flow rate. However, the presence of oxygen
on the surface promotes higher efficiency than its activated car-
bon monolith counterpart although the protein binding is slightly
different. Furthermore, the flow rate of substrate in the reaction
plays an interesting role on enzymatic activity since it can lead to
better accessibility of substrate to enzyme on the surface of micro-
/macroporous carbon monolith support. In addition, the products
can be easily removed via macropores of the carbon monolith sup-
port.
[19] M. Shakeri, K. Kawakami, Catal. Commun. 10 (2008) 165.
[20] A.G. Kumar, S. Swarnalatha, P. Kamatchi, G. Sekaran, J. Biochem. Eng. 43 (2009)
185.
[21] C.J. Gommes, N. Job, J.-P. Pirard, S. Blacher, B. Goderis, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 41
(2008) 663.
[22] A. Siyasukh, P. Maneeprom, S. Larpkiattaworn, N. Tonanon, W. Tantha-
panichakoon, H. Tamon, T. Charinpanitkul, Carbon 46 (2008) 1309.
[23] M.M. Bradford, Anal. Biochem. 72 (1976) 248.
Micro-/macroporous carbon monolith is proved to be a poten-
tial support for lipase immobilization because of its hydrophobic
surface, high surface area and surface modification besides its size
and pore structure can be tailored made. Low back pressure, good
mass transfer and high throughput are advantages of the micro-
/macroporous carbon monolith which can be applied as a support
for flow-through/continuous enzyme reaction or a component in a
micro reactor.
[24] S. Adisuk, Dissertation of Doctor of Engineering Program in Chemical Engineer-
ing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, 2008.
[25] V. Gomez-Serrano, J. Pastor-Villegas, A. Perez-Florindo, C. Duran-Valle, C.
Valenzuela-Calahorro, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 36 (1996) 71.
[26] S. Biniak, G. Szymanski, J. Siedlewski, A. Swiatkowski, Carbon 35 (1997) 1799.
[27] M. Domingo-García, F.J. López-Garzón, M. Pérez-Mendoza, J. Colloid Interface
Sci. 222 (2000) 233.
´
[28] B. Buczek, S. Biniak, A. Swia˛tkowski, Fuel 78 (2008) 1443.
[29] J.-H. Zhou, Z.-J. Sui, J. Zhu, P. Li, D. Chen, Y.-C. Dai, W.-K. Yuan, Carbon 45 (2007)
785.
[30] C. Moreno-Castilla, F. Carrasco-Marín, F.J. Maldonado-Hódar, J. Rivera-Utrilla,
Carbon 36 (1998) 145.
Acknowledgements
[31] C. Moreno-Castilla, M.V. Lépez-Ramón, F. Carrasco-Marín, Carbon 38 (2000)
1995.
[32] H.P. Boehm, Carbon 40 (2002) 145.
[33] F.J. López-Garzón, M. Domingo-García, M. Pérez-mendoza, P.M. Alvarez, V.
Gómez-Serrano, Langmuir 19 (2003) 2838.
This work had been supported by the Thailand Research Fund
(TRF) and Chulalongkorn University Centenary Academic Develop-
ment Project.
[34] Y. Li, F. Gao, W. Wei, J.-B. Qu, G.-H. Ma, W.-Q. Zhou, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 66
(2010) 182.
[35] I.H. Segel, Enzyme Kinetics Behavior and Analysis of Rapid Equilibrium and
Steady-state Enzyme Systems, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1993.
References
[1] W. Tischer, F. Wedekind, Top. Curr. Chem. 200 (1999) 95.