BECKER ET AL.
17 of 18
5.
6.
7.
Mastrobattista E, Koning GA, van Bloois L, Filipe ACS, Jiskoot W,
Storm G. Functional characterization of an endosome-disruptive pep-
tide and its application in cytosolic delivery of immunoliposome-
entrapped proteins. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(30):27135-27143.
27. Eggimann GA, Buschor S, DarbreT, Reymond J-L. Convergent synthe-
sis and cellular uptake of multivalent cell penetrating peptides derived
from Tat, Antp, pVEC, TP10 and SAP. Org Biomol Chem. 2013;11(39):
6717-6733.
Kumar M, Gupta D, Singh G, et al. Novel polymeric nanoparticles for
intracellular delivery of peptide cargos: antitumor efficacy of
the BCL-2 conversion peptide NuBCP-9. Cancer Res. 2014;74(12):
28. Richter M, Chakrabarti A, Ruttekolk IR, et al. Multivalent design of
apoptosis-inducing bid-BH3 peptide-oligosaccharides boosts the
intracellular activity at identical overall peptide concentrations. Chem
a Eur J. 2012;18(52):16708-16715.
3271-3281.
Bartolami E, Basagiannis D, Zong L, et al. Diselenolane-mediated cel-
lular uptake: efficient cytosolic delivery of probes, peptides, proteins,
artificial metalloenzymes and protein-coated quantum dots.
Chemistry. 2019;25(16):4047-4051.
29. Chakrabarti A, Witsenburg JJ, Sinzinger MD, et al. Multivalent pre-
sentation of the cell-penetrating peptide nona-arginine on a linear
scaffold strongly increases its membrane-perturbing capacity. Biochim
Biophys Acta. 2014;1838(12):3097-3106.
8
.
.
Ruseska I, Zimmer A. Internalization mechanisms of cell-penetrating
peptides. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2020;11:101-123.
30. Benjamin CJ, Wright KJ, Hyun S-H, et al. Nonfouling NTA-PEG-based
TEM grid coatings for selective capture of histidine-tagged protein
targets from cell lysates. Langmuir. 2016;32(2):551-559.
9
Kauffman WB, Guha S, Wimley WC. Synthetic molecular evolution of
hybrid cell penetrating peptides. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2568.
31. Schneider H, Deweid L, Pirzer T, et al. Dextramabs: a novel format of
1
1
1
0. Jones SW, Christison R, Bundell K, et al. Characterisation of cell-
antibody-drug conjugates featuring a multivalent polysaccharide
penetrating peptide-mediated peptide delivery. Br J Pharmacol. 2005;
scaffold. ChemistryOpen. 2019;8(3):354-357.
145(8):1093-1102.
32. Schneider H, Yanakieva D, Macarrón A, et al. TRAIL-inspired multiva-
lent dextran conjugates efficiently induce apoptosis upon DR5 recep-
tor clustering. Chembiochem. 2019;20(24):3006-3012.
1. Liu J, Gaj T, Patterson JT, Sirk SJ, Barbas CF III. Cell-penetrating
peptide-mediated delivery of TALEN proteins via bioconjugation for
genome engineering. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e85755.
33. Zhang X, Xi W, Wang C, Podgórski M, Bowman CN. Visible-light-
initiated Thiol-Michael addition polymerizations with coumarin-based
photobase generators: another photoclick reaction strategy. ACS
Macro Lett. 2016;5(2):229-233.
2. Schneider AFL, Wallabregue ALD, Franz L, Hackenberger CPR.
Targeted subcellular protein delivery using cleavable cyclic cell-
penetrating peptides. Bioconjug Chem. 2019;30(2):400-404.
1
1
3. Dougherty PG, Sahni A, Pei D. Understanding cell penetration of
cyclic peptides. Chem Rev. 2019;119(17):10241-10287.
34. Kodaka M, Yang Z, Nakagawa K, et al. A new cell-based assay to eval-
uate myogenesis in mouse myoblast C2C12 cells. Exp Cell Res. 2015;
336(2):171-181.
4. Varkouhi AK, Scholte M, Storm G, Haisma HJ. Endosomal escape
pathways for delivery of biologicals. J Control Release. 2011;151(3):
35. van Witteloostuijn SB, Pedersen SL, Jensen KJ. Half-life extension of
biopharmaceuticals using chemical methods: alternatives to
PEGylation. ChemMedChem. 2016;11(22):2474-2495.
220-228.
1
1
1
1
5. Qian Z, Martyna A, Hard RL, et al. Discovery and mechanism of highly
efficient cyclic cell-penetrating peptides. Biochemistry. 2016;55(18):
36. Kolb HC, Finn MG, Sharpless KB. Click chemistry: diverse chemical
function from a few good reactions. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2001;40(11):
2004-2021.
2601-2612.
6. Akishiba M, Takeuchi T, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Cytosolic antibody deliv-
ery by lipid-sensitive endosomolytic peptide. Nat Chem. 2017;9(8):
37. Hedegaard SF, Derbas MS, Lind TK, et al. Fluorophore labeling of a
cell-penetrating peptide significantly alters the mode and degree of
biomembrane interaction. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):6327.
751-761.
7. Li W, Nicol F, Szoka FC. GALA: a designed synthetic pH-responsive
amphipathic peptide with applications in drug and gene delivery. Adv
Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56(7):967-985.
38. Milech N, Longville BAC, Cunningham PT, et al. GFP-
complementation assay to detect functional CPP and protein delivery
into living cells. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):18329-18329.
8. Tamemoto N, Akishiba M, Sakamoto K, Kawano K, Noguchi H,
Futaki S. Rational design principles of attenuated cationic lytic
peptides for intracellular delivery of biomacromolecules. Mol Pharm.
39. Cabantous S, Terwilliger TC, Waldo GS. Protein tagging and detection
with engineered self-assembling fragments of green fluorescent pro-
tein. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23(1):102-107.
2020;17(6):2175-2185.
1
2
9. Herce HD, Schumacher D, Schneider AFL, et al. Cell-permeable
nanobodies for targeted immunolabelling and antigen manipulation in
living cells. Nat Chem. 2017;9(8):762-771.
40. Sazani P, Kang S-H, Maier MA, et al. Nuclear antisense effects of neu-
tral, anionic and cationic oligonucleotide analogs. Nucleic Acids Res.
2001;29(19):3965-3974.
0. Guo Z, Peng H, Kang J, Sun D. Cell-penetrating peptides: possible
transduction mechanisms and therapeutic applications (review).
Biomed Rep. 2016;4(5):528-534.
41. Shiraishi T, Nielsen PE. Peptide nucleic acid (PNA) cell penetrating
peptide (CPP) conjugates as carriers for cellular delivery of antisense
oligomers. Artif DNA PNA XNA. 2011;2(3):90-99.
2
1. Jones AT, Sayers EJ. Cell entry of cell penetrating peptides: tales of
tails wagging dogs. J Control Release. 2012;161(2):582-591.
2. Yan L, Adams ME. Lycotoxins, antimicrobial peptides from venom
of the wolf SpiderLycosa carolinensis. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(4):
42. Akkus ZB, Nazir I, Jalil A, Tribus M, Bernkop-Schnürch A. Zeta poten-
tial changing polyphosphate nanoparticles: a promising approach to
overcome the mucus and epithelial barrier. Mol Pharm. 2019;16(6):
2817-2825.
2
2
059-2066.
43. Dash PR, Read ML, Barrett LB, Wolfert MA, Seymour LW.
Factors affecting blood clearance and in vivo distribution of
polyelectrolyte complexes for gene delivery. Gene Ther. 1999;6(4):
643-650.
2
3. Akishiba M, Futaki S. Inducible membrane permeabilization by atten-
uated lytic peptides: a new concept for accessing cell interiors
through ruffled membranes. Mol Pharm. 2019;16(6):2540-2548.
4. Klán P, Šolomek T, Bochet CG, et al. Photoremovable protecting
groups in chemistry and biology: reaction mechanisms and efficacy.
Chem Rev. 2013;113(1):119-191.
2
44. Ziegler A, Seelig J. Interaction of the protein transduction domain of
HIV-1 TAT with heparan sulfate: binding mechanism and thermody-
namic parameters. Biophys J. 2004;86(1):254-263.
2
5. Menge C, Heckel A. Coumarin-caged dG for improved wavelength-
selective uncaging of DNA. Org Lett. 2011;13(17):4620-4623.
6. Patel SG, Sayers EJ, He L, et al. Cell-penetrating peptide sequence and
modification dependent uptake and subcellular distribution of green
florescent protein in different cell lines. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6298.
45. Fischer D, Li Y, Ahlemeyer B, Krieglstein J, Kissel T. In vitro cytotoxic-
ity testing of polycations: influence of polymer structure on cell viabil-
ity and hemolysis. Biomaterials. 2003;24(7):1121-1131.
2
46. Du J-Z, Sun T-M, Song W-J, Wu J, Wang J. A tumor-acidity-activated
charge-conversional nanogel as an intelligent vehicle for promoted