C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Our next goal was to evaluate the ability of RPF1 to detect
endogenous production of H O from living biological samples.
2 2
Assays employed purified mitochondria from Saccharomyces
cereVisiae. The yeast mitochondria were stimulated with antimycin
A (0.54 mg/mL), a cytochrome bc
inhibitor,18 to trigger generation
1
of H and other ROS by uncoupling of the respiratory electron
2
O
2
transport chain. Samples were treated with antimycin A for various
times and analyzed directly with RPF1. The ratiometric emission
data collected in Figure 1c show clear increases in H
from antimycin A-inhibited mitochondria over untreated control
samples; H levels detected by RPF1 (0.2 µM/min) are within
ranges reported using other analytical techniques.
2 2
O production
2
O
2
19,20
In addition,
control experiments show that RPF1 does not react with antimycin
A, and stimulated mitochondria without dye give no fluorescence.
The results demonstrate that RPF1 is capable of monitoring and
quantifying changes in endogenous [H
fluorescence response.
2 2
O ] through a ratiometric
To summarize, we have presented the synthesis and properties
of RPF1, a new type of ratiometric fluorescence reporter for
hydrogen peroxide. This FRET-based reagent features good selec-
2 2
tivity for H O over competing ROS as well as visible wavelength
excitation and emission profiles to minimize damage and autof-
luorescence from biological samples. Experiments with viable
mitochondria show that RPF1 can detect and quantify endogenous
H O production, establishing the potential utility of this approach
2 2
for probing peroxide biology in living systems.
Acknowledgment. We thank the University of California,
Berkeley, the Dreyfus Foundation, the Beckman Foundation, and
the American Federation for Aging Research for funding. A.E.A.
is supported by a Chemical Biology Interface Training Grant from
the NIH (T32 GM066698) and a Berkeley Chancellor’s Opportunity
Fellowship. We thank Prof. David Drubin for supplying mitochon-
dria, and Eric Paradise for help with artwork.
Figure 1. (a) Ratiometric fluorescence response of 1 µM RPF1 to 200
µM H2O2. Spectra shown were acquired before H2O2 addition and 5, 10,
1
5, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, and 60 min after H2O2 was added. (b)
Relative reactivities of 1 µM RPF1 to various ROS. (1) H2O2; (2) tert-
-
+
t
butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP); (3) O2 ; (4) NO; (5) NO ; (6) •OH; (7) •O -
-
1
-
Bu; (8) OCl ; (9) O3; (10) O2. Data shown are for 10 mM O2 , 2 mM
O2, and 200 µM for all other ROS. Bars represent emission intensity ratios
1
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic and experimental
details (PDF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet
at http://pubs.acs.org.
at 5 (white), 15 (light gray), 30 (gray), 45 (dark gray), and 60 min (black)
after addition of the appropriate ROS. (c) Fluorometric analysis of H2O2
produced by viable yeast mitochondria using 1 µM RPF1. Bars show
emission intensity ratios for untreated control mitochondria (white) and
mitochondria stimulated with the cytochrome bc1 inhibitor antimycin A
References
(
0.54 mg/mL) to disrupt the electron transport chain. All measurements
(
1) Rhee, S. G.; Kang, S. W.; Jeong, W.; Chang, T.-S.; Yang, K.-S.; Woo,
H. A. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2005, 17, 183-189.
were acquired in DPBS with 1% FBS, pH 7.4, with excitation at 420 nm.
(
2) Balaban, R. S.; Nemoto, S.; Finkel, T. Cell 2005, 120, 483-495.
characteristic of fluorescein, and high-resolution mass spectrometry
confirms that a pendant fluorescein is generated from the reaction
(3) Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J. M. C. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine,
3rd ed.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1999.
(
4) Barnham, K. J.; Masters, C. L.; Bush, A. I. Nat. ReV. Drug DiscoVery
between RPF1 and H
emission intensities (λ517/λ464) upon excitation at 420 nm varies from
.45 in the absence of H to 3.7 after H treatment after 1 h, a ca.
-fold emission ratio increase due to FRET modulation. The observ-
2 2
O . The ratio of fluorescein- to coumarin-type
2
004, 3, 205-214.
(
(
5) Shah, A. M.; Channon, K. M. Heart 2004, 90, 486-487.
6) Ohshima, H.; Tatemichi, M.; Sawa, T. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2003,
0
8
2
O
2
2 2
O
417, 3-11.
(7) Hempel, S. L.; Buettner, G. R.; O’Malley, Y. Q.; Wessels, D. A.; Flaherty,
D. M. Free Radical Biol. Med. 1999, 27, 146-159.
2 2
ed rate constant for H O -mediated deprotection of RPF1 under
pseudo-first-order conditions (1 µM dye, 1 mM H O ) is kobs )
2 2
2
not rapid, its relatively large dynamic range allows this probe to detect
the low micromolar levels of H O
(
8) Wolfbeis, O. S.; D u¨ rkop, A.; Wu, M.; Lin, Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 4495-4498.
-
4
-1
(9) Onoda, M.; Uchiyama, S.; Endo, A.; Tokuyama, H.; Santa, T.; Imai, K.
Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1459-1461.
.7(1) × 10
s . Although the reaction of RPF1 with peroxide is
(10) Lo, L.-C.; Chu, C.-Y. Chem. Commun. 2003, 2728-2729.
(11) Maeda, H.; Fukuyasu, Y.; Yoshida, S.; Fukuda, M.; Saeki, K.; Matsuno,
H.; Yamauchi, Y.; Yoshida, K.; Hirata, K.; Miyamoto, K. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2389-2391.
required for cellular signaling.17
2 2
2 2
The ratiometric emission response of RPF1 is highly H O
(
(
(
12) Chang, M. C. Y.; Pralle, A.; Isacoff, E. I.; Chang, C. J. J. Am. Chem.
selective. Figure 1b shows the fluorescence responses of RPF1 to
various ROS over time. The FRET-based probe shows a >5-fold
higher emission ratio response to H
superoxide (O
Soc. 2004, 126, 15392-15393.
13) Miller, E. W.; Albers, A. E.; Pralle, A.; Isacoff, E. I.; Chang, C. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16652-16659.
2
O
2
over similar ROS, such as
14) Xu, K.; Tang, B.; Huang, H.; Yang, G.; Chen, Z.; Li, P.; An, L. Chem.
Commun. 2005, 5974-5976.
-
2
) or tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP). RPF1 is also
than S-nitrosocysteine (SNOC),
>
8-fold more responsive to H
2
O
2
(15) Tsien, R. Y.; Poenie, M. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1986, 11, 450-455.
(
16) Takakusa, H.; Kikuchi, K.; Urano, Y.; Kojima, H.; Nagano, T. Chem.s
+
an NO donor in vitro, as well as nitric oxide gas (NO). The
Eur. J. 2003, 9, 1479-1485.
coumarin-fluorescein cassette is also >8-fold more selective for
H O over highly oxidizing ROS, such as hydroxyl radical (•OH),
2 2
tert-butoxy radical (•O Bu), singlet oxygen ( O
Finally, RPF1 is >3-fold more reactive toward H
hypochlorite ion (-OCl).
(17) Stone, J. R. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 422, 119-124.
18) Xia, D.; Yu, C.-A.; Kim, H.; Xia, J. Z.; Kachurin, A. M.; Zhang, L.; Yu,
(
L.; Deisenhofer, J. Science 1997, 277, 60-66.
t
1
2
), and ozone (O
3
).
(19) Staniek, K.; Nohl, H. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1460, 268-275.
20) Fang, J.; Beattie, D. S. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2003, 34, 478-488.
(
2 2
O
than to
JA063308K
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 128, NO. 30, 2006 9641