C. Mansano-Weiss et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 358 (2005) 2199–2206
2205
Table 2
Equilibrium constants of the formation of LCu -OOR system
[5] J.K. Kochi, Organometallic Mechanisms and Catalysis, Academic
Press, New York, 1978.
III
III
K(LCu -OOR) (M )
ꢀ1
[6] R.A. Sheldon, J.K. Kochi, Metal Catalyzed Oxidations of
Organic Compounds, Academic Press, New York, 1981.
Copper complex
Peroxyl radical
II
Cu (GGG)
Å
O
O
O
O
2
2
2
2
CH
CH
CH
CH
3
2
2
3
2300 ± 340
2500 ± 400
700 ± 105
650 ± 130
[
7] J.O. Edwards, R. Curci, Catalytic Oxidations with Hydrogen
Peroxide as Oxidant, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992,
p. 97.
II
Cu (GGG)
Å
Å
Å
CN
II
Cu (GGG)
3 2
C(CH ) OH
II
Cu (gly)
2
[
[
8] D. MeyersteinMetal Ions in Biological Systems, vol. 36, Marcel
Dekker, New York, 1999, pp. 41–77.
9] S. Goldstein, G. Czapski, D. Meyerstein, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112
(
1990) 6489.
10] P. Neta, R.E. Huie, A.B. Ross, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 19
1990) 413.
In this system, the influence of the following substances
was also tested: thiosulfate, sulfite, nitrite, and ascor-
bate. None of these substances reacted with the formed
intermediate.
[
(
[11] S. Goldstein, D. Meyerstein, G. Czapski, Free Radic. Biol. Med.
15 (1993) 435.
[
12] Z.B. Alfassi, Peroxyl Radicals in the Chemistry of Free Radicals,
Wiley, Chichester, 1997.
II
Å
3
Å
.3. Reaction of Cu (GGG) with O CH CN and
2 2
[13] S. Goldstein, D. Meyerstein, Acc. Chem. Res. 32 (1999) 547.
[14] D. Meyerstein, J. Inorg. Biochem. 86 (2001) 75.
O CH C(CH ) OH radicals
2
2
3 2
[15] A. Neuberger, L.L.M. van Deenen, Free Radical Damage and Its
Similar intermediates were formed in the reactions of
Å
Control, Elsevier, 1994.
[16] E.A. Lewis, W.B. Tolman, Chem. Rev. 104 (2004) 1047.
Å
O CH CN and O CH C(CH ) OH radicals. These sys-
2
2
2
2
3 2
[17] K.D. Karlin, C.X. Zhang, H.C. Liang, Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem.
Soc. 221 (2001) U640.
tems were not studied in detail.
According to the results, the peroxyl radicals derived
from the methyl-, acetonitrile- and tert-butanol-radical
[18] S. Schindler, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2000) 2311.
[19] K.D. Karlin, S. Kaderli, A.D. Zuberbuhler, Acc. Chem. Res. 30
(1997) 139.
[20] Y. Morooka, K. Fujisawa, N. Kitajima, Pure Appl. Chem. 67
II
react with the Cu (GGG) complex to yield the interme-
III
diate complex (GGG)Cu O R in equilibria reactions.
2
(
1995) 241.
The results are summarized in Table 2. The weakest
binding is that to the peroxyl-tert-butanol radical, as ex-
pected for a molecule with electron-donating substitu-
ents. The peroxyl radicals derived from methyl and
acetonitrile yield similar equi- librium constants,
although acetonitrile is the more electronegative group.
[
[
21] N. Kitajima, Y. Morooka, Chem. Rev. 94 (1994) 737.
22] M.J. Henson, M.A. Vance, C.X. Zhang, H.C. Liang, K.D.
Karlin, E.I. Solomon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 5186.
[23] E. Kim, M.E. Helton, I.M. Wasser, K.D. Karlin, S. Lu, H.W.
Huang, P. Moenne-Loccoz, C.D. Incarvito, A.L. Rheingold, M.
Honecker, S. Kaderli, A.D. Zuberbuhler, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 100 (2003) 3623.
Å
Å
ꢀ
The radicals O CH OH and O CH COO did not re-
2
2
2
2
[24] E.J. Hart, S. Gordon, J.K. Thomas, J. Phys. Chem. 68 (1964)
1271.
act with the Cu–triglycine complex.
The equilibrium constant of the reaction between the
[25] J.K. Thomas, S. Gordon, E.J. Hart, J. Phys. Chem. 68 (1964)
1524.
[26] M. Freiberg, D. Meyerstein, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. I 76
II
methylperoxyl radical and Cu (gly) is lower than that
2
II
with Cu (GGG), indicating that the GGG ligand sup-
(
1980) 1825.
III
ports the Cu(III) state in the LCu -OOR complex bet-
ter than the glycine ligand.
[
[
[
[
27] S. Goldstein, G. Czapski, H. Cohen, D. Meyerstein, Inorg. Chem.
31 (1992) 2439.
28] J.W.T. Spinks, R.J. Woods, An Introduction to Radiation
Chemistry, third ed., Wiley, New York, 1990, p. 305.
29] J.W.T. Spinks, R.J. Woods, An Introduction to Radiation
Chemistry, third ed., Wiley, New York, 1990, p. 105.
30] T. Nash, Nature 170 (1952) 976.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported in part by grants from the
Israel Science Foundation and from the Budgeting and
Planning Committee of The Council of Higher Educa-
tion and the Israel Atomic Energy Commission. D.M.
thanks the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for
support and Mrs. Irene Evens for her ongoing interest
and support.
[31] M.S. Matheson, L. Dorfman, Pulse Radiolysis, M.I.T. Press,
Cambridge, MA, 1969.
[32] G.V. Buxton, C.V. Greenstock, W.P. Helman, A.B. Ross,
J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 17 (1988) 513.
[33] D. Veltwisch, E. Janata, K.D. Asmus, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 (1980) 146–153.
[34] A. Sauer, H. Cohen, D. Meyerstein, Inorg. Chem. 27 (1988)
578.
35] A. Sauer, H. Cohen, D. Meyerstein, Inorg. Chem. 28 (1989)
511.
4
[
[
[
2
36] E. Solomon-Rapaport, A. Masarwa, H. Cohen, D. Meyerstein,
Inorg. Chim. Acta 299 (2000) 41.
References
37] E. Solomon-Rapaport, A. Masarwa, H. Cohen, J.S. Valentine,
D. Meyerstein, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2002) 2427.
[
[
[
1] C. Walling, G. El-Taliawi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 95 (1973) 848.
2] C. Walling, Acc. Chem. Res. 8 (1975) 125.
3] J.K. Kochi, Oxidation Reduction Reactions, Wiley, New York,
[38] C. MansanoWeiss, H. Cohen, D. Meyerstein, Abstr. Pap. Am.
Chem. Soc. 212 (1996) 410, INOR.
1
973.
[39] C. Mansano-Weiss, H. Cohen, D. Meyerstein, J. Inorg. Biochem.
91 (2002) 199.
[
4] J.K. Kochi, Acc. Chem. Res. 7 (1974) 351.