19810-04-9 Usage
General Description
The chemical 1-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)undecanone, also known as rhododendrol, is a synthetic compound used in various cosmetic and skin care products. It is known for its skin-lightening and brightening properties, and is often included in formulations designed to treat hyperpigmentation, age spots, and uneven skin tone. However, concerns have been raised about the potential health risks associated with rhododendrol, particularly its links to skin depigmentation and ochronosis. As a result, some regulatory agencies have restricted the use of rhododendrol in cosmetic products, and further research is ongoing to understand its potential impacts on human health.
Check Digit Verification of cas no
The CAS Registry Mumber 19810-04-9 includes 8 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 5 digits, 1,9,8,1 and 0 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 0 and 4 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 19810-04:
(7*1)+(6*9)+(5*8)+(4*1)+(3*0)+(2*0)+(1*4)=109
109 % 10 = 9
So 19810-04-9 is a valid CAS Registry Number.
InChI:InChI=1/C17H26O3/c1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-16(19)15-12-11-14(18)13-17(15)20/h11-13,18,20H,2-10H2,1H3
19810-04-9Relevant articles and documents
Antifungal Activity of 2,4-Dihydroxyacylophenones and Related Compounds
Mizobuchi, Shigeyuki,Sato, Yuko
, p. 1327 - 1334 (2007/10/02)
The antifungal activity of 2,4-dihydroxyacylophenones and related compounds against Trichophyton spp. and other fungi were investigated to determine their structure-activity relationships.The activity of these compounds was found to be closely related to the length of the acyl and alkyl substituents attached to the 1,3-dihydroxybenzene moiety.In addition, differences in activity were observed depending on the position of the alkyl substituents and on the number of substituents attached to the 1,3-dihydroxybenzene moiety.Some compounds tested showed potent antifungal activity against Trichophyton spp. and other fungi that was more active than amphotericin B.
