2381-85-3 Usage
Chemical Properties
crystalline solid
Uses
Nile Blue chloride is a histological and lipid stain.
Definition
ChEBI: An organic chloride salt having 5-amino-9-(diethylamino)benzo[a]phenoxazin-7-ium as the couterion. fluorescent dye which is also a potent photosensitiser for photodynamic therapy.
Preparation
commonly known as the Nile Blue. 5-(Diethylamino)-2-nitrosophenol?and Naphthalen-1-amine hydrochloride reaction.
Properties and Applications
bright blue. Soluble in hot water and ethanol are blue. The strong sulfuric acid for orange or brown, after dilute for blu-ray to green and then into a blue. The dye solution to join sodium hydroxide have red precipitation (precipitation soluble in ethyl ether for a green fluorescent light brown orange).
Standard( Cotton )
Light Fastness
Persperation Fastness
Ironing Fastness
Soaping
Fading
Stain
Fading
Stain
Fading
Stain
A
1
2-3
3
1
Standard( Cotton )
Light Fastness
Fading
Stain
Check Digit Verification of cas no
The CAS Registry Mumber 2381-85-3 includes 7 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 4 digits, 2,3,8 and 1 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 8 and 5 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 2381-85:
(6*2)+(5*3)+(4*8)+(3*1)+(2*8)+(1*5)=83
83 % 10 = 3
So 2381-85-3 is a valid CAS Registry Number.
InChI:InChI=1/C20H20N3O.ClH/c1-3-23(4-2)13-9-10-17-18(11-13)24-19-12-16(21)14-7-5-6-8-15(14)20(19)22-17;/h5-12H,3-4,21H2,1-2H3;1H/q+1;/p-1
2381-85-3Relevant articles and documents
Transition-Metal-Mediated versus Tetrazine-Triggered Bioorthogonal Release Reactions: Direct Comparison and Combinations Thereof
Dzijak, Rastislav,Mancuso, Francesca,Mertlíková-Kaiserová, Helena,Rahm, Michal,Vrabel, Milan
, p. 1669 - 1675 (2020)
Bioorthogonal cleavage reactions are gaining popularity in chemically inducible prodrug activation and in the control of biomolecular functions. Despite similar applications, these reactions were developed and optimized on different substrates and under different experimental conditions. Reported herein is a side-by-side comparison of palladium-, ruthenium- and tetrazine-triggered release reactions, which aims at comparing the reaction kinetics, efficiency and overall advantages and limitations of the methods. In addition, we disclose the possibility of mutual combination of the cleavage reactions. Finally, we compare the efficiency of the bioorthogonal deprotections in cellular experiments, which revealed that among the three methods investigated, the palladium- and the tetrazine-promoted reaction can be used for efficient prodrug activation, but only the tetrazine-triggered reactions proceed efficiently inside cells.