265119-86-6

Basic information

• Product Name: Propanoicacid, 2-broMo-2-Methyl-, 3-(ethoxydiMethylsilyl)propyl ester
• Synonyms: Propanoicacid, 2-broMo-2-Methyl-, 3-(ethoxydiMethylsilyl)propyl ester
• CAS NO: 265119-86-6
• Molecular Formula: C11H23BrO3Si
• Molecular Weight: 311.28802
• Mol File: 265119-86-6.mol

Chemical Properties

• Appearance: /
• CAS DataBase Reference: Propanoicacid, 2-broMo-2-Methyl-, 3-(ethoxydiMethylsilyl)propyl ester(CAS DataBase Reference)
• NIST Chemistry Reference: Propanoicacid, 2-broMo-2-Methyl-, 3-(ethoxydiMethylsilyl)propyl ester(265119-86-6)
• EPA Substance Registry System: Propanoicacid, 2-broMo-2-Methyl-, 3-(ethoxydiMethylsilyl)propyl ester(265119-86-6)

Safety Data

• Hazardous Substances Data: 265119-86-6(Hazardous Substances Data)

Usage

Uses

Used in Pharmaceutical Industry:
Propanoicacid, 2-bromo-2-methyl-, 3-(ethoxydimethylsilyl)propyl ester is used as a reagent for the protection of alcohols in the synthesis of various pharmaceutical compounds. Its ability to efficiently shield functional groups contributes to the successful production of target molecules, ensuring the integrity and stability of the final product.
Used in Agrochemical Industry:
In the agrochemical sector, Propanoicacid, 2-bromo-2-methyl-, 3-(ethoxydimethylsilyl)propyl ester is utilized as a key intermediate in the development of agrochemicals. Its role in the synthesis process aids in the creation of effective and stable agrochemical products designed to enhance crop protection and yield.
Used in Polymer Production:
Propanoicacid, 2-bromo-2-methyl-, 3-(ethoxydimethylsilyl)propyl ester is employed as a stabilizer in the production of polymers. Its stabilizing properties are crucial in maintaining the structural integrity and performance of the polymers, making it an essential component in the manufacturing process.
Used in Chemical Research:
As a valuable tool in chemical research, Propanoicacid, 2-bromo-2-methyl-, 3-(ethoxydimethylsilyl)propyl ester is used for the exploration and development of new synthetic pathways and methodologies. Its versatility in protecting and stabilizing functional groups allows researchers to investigate novel chemical reactions and mechanisms, furthering the understanding of organic chemistry.

Upstream product

• 14857-34-2 dimethyl(ethoxy)silane 
• 40630-82-8 1-[(2-bromo-2-methylpropionyl)oxy]-2-propene 

Relevant articles and documents

Atom transfer radical polymerization from nanoparticles: A tool for the preparation of well-defined hybrid nanostructures and for understanding the chemistry of controlled/"living" radical polymerizations from surfaces

Structurally well-defined polymer - nanoparticle hybrids were prepared by modifying the surface of silica nanoparticles with initiators for atom transfer radical polymerization and by using these initiator-modified nanoparticles as macroinitiators. Well-defined polymer chains were grown from the nanoparticle surfaces to yield individual particles composed of a silica core and a well-defined, densely grafted outer polystyrene or poly(methyl methacrylate) layer. In both cases;, linear kinetic plots, linear plots of molecular weight (Mn) versus conversion, increases in hydrodynamic diameter with increasing conversion, and narrow molecular weight distributions (Mw/Mn) for the grafted polymer samples were observed. Polymerizations of styrene from smaller (75-nm-diameter) silica nanoparticles exhibited good molecular weight control, while polymerizations of methyl methacrylate (MMA) from the same nanoparticles exhibited good molecular weight control only when a small amount of free initiator was added to the polymerization solution. The difference in polymerization behavior for styrene and MMA was ascribed to the facts that styrene undergoes thermal self-initiation while MMA does not and that termination processes involving freely diffusing chains are faster than those involving surface-bound chains. The polymerizations of both styrene and MMA from larger (300-nm-diameter) silica nanoparticles did not exhibit molecular weight control. This lack of control was ascribed to the very high initial monomer-to-initiator ratio in these polymerizations. Molecular weight control was induced by the addition of a small amount of free initiator to the polymerization but was not induced when 5-15 mol % of deactivator (Cu(II) complex) was added.