C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
ingly, the excited state lifetime of 3 (τ ) 710 ns) lies between that
of 1 and 2 which implies that stereochemistry and the nature of
the coordinated ligands profoundly influence the excited state
dynamics in these PDI-acetylide chromophores.
We have directly observed the triplet state of the PDI chro-
mophore by establishing a PtII-acetylide linkage in its bay region.
The singlet fluorescence of the PDI moieties is quantitatively
quenched as a result of this linkage, producing characteristic
transient absorption difference spectra with concomitant long
lifetimes ranging from 246 ns to 1.0 µs. Each of these nonlumi-
1
nescent compounds readily sensitizes O2 emission in the near-IR
when excited with visible light in the presence of dissolved O2.
The current work represents an efficient starting point toward
intramolecularly accessing the long-lived PDI triplet state, proven
elusive in the past. Armed with the present strategy, polymer solar
cells harnessing the PDI triplet state now appear viable, but its broad
application in photonics and photofunctional materials also seems
imminent.
Acknowledgment. The authors thank Dr. Xianghuai Wang for
helpful discussions. This work was supported by the Air Force
Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-05-1-0276), the National
Science Foundation (CHE-0719050), the ACS-PRF (44138-AC3),
and the BGSU Research Enhancement Initiative.
Figure 2. Transient absorption difference spectra of 1 (A), 2 (B), and 3
(C). All transients were collected in deaerated CH2Cl2 at room temperature
with λex ) 450 nm (2.5-3 mJ/pulse). Single-exponential decay times are
indicated within each panel.
Supporting Information Available: Synthesis, experimental de-
tails, additional kinetic analyses and spectra. This material is available
experimental data support the conclusion that a long lifetime PDI-
localized triplet state is readily accessible and populated in 1-3.
The transient absorption spectrum of 1 (Figure 2A) does not
References
3
exhibit features typical of the CT excited state of PtII diimine
(1) Wu¨rthner, F. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1564-1579.
chromophores.15,17 The difference spectrum in Figure 2A reveals
an intense excited state absorption at 495 nm and ground state
bleach near 575 nm followed by a broad, less intense absorption
between 620 and 880 nm and excited state absorption centered at
1080 nm. These spectral features do not coincide with characteristic
PDI singlet state transient absorptions or the associated radical
cations or anions. The excited state lifetime of 1 as ascertained by
transient absorption kinetics is 246 ns, consistent with the antici-
pated PDI-localized triplet state parentage.
The corresponding cis-disposed phosphine model complex 2
lacking CT excited states exhibits a transient absorption spectrum
nearly identical to that of 1, Figure 2B. The most disparate
difference between 1 and 2 is that the excited state lifetime is
extended to 1.0 µs in 2. This increase in lifetime may be accounted
for by the lack of a low-lying 3CT state in 2, the presence of which
may facilitate more efficient excited state deactivation in 1. Future
ultrafast transient absorption measurements will be applied to
investigate these processes further. To exclude the possibility of
electronic coupling effects between neighboring PDI moieties in 1
and 2, the corresponding trans-disposed model complex 3 was
synthesized. Importantly, no quantitative changes occur in the
position, shape, relative intensities, and number of transitions in
the ground state (Figure 1A) or transient absorption difference
spectra (Figure 2C). This observation readily excludes the possibility
of intramolecular interactions from neighboring PDI units. Interest-
(2) Wasielewski, M. R. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5051-5066.
(3) (a) Zang, L.; Liu, R.; Holman, M. W.; Nguyen, K. T.; Adams, D. M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10640-10641. (b) Wang, W.; Wan, W.; Zhou,
H.-H.; Niu, S.; Li, A. D. Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5248-5249.
(4) Jones, B. A.; Ahrens, M. J.; Yoon, M.-H.; Facchetti, A.; Marks, T. J.;
Wasielewski, M. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6363-6366.
(5) Zhan, X.; Tan, Z.; Domercq, B.; An, Z.; Zhang, X.; Barlow, S.; Li, Y.;
Zhu, D.; Kippelen, B.; Marder, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7246-
7247.
(6) Ego, C.; Marsitzky, D.; Becker, S.; Zhang, J.; Grimsdale, A. C.; Mu¨llen,
K.; MacKenzie, J. D.; Silva, C.; Friend, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 437-443.
(7) Breeze, A. J.; Salomon, A.; Ginley, D. S.; Gregg, B. A,. Tilmann, H.;
Ho¨rhold, H.-H. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 3085-3087.
(8) Shao, Y.; Yang, Y. AdV. Mater. 2005, 17, 2841-2844.
(9) Guo, F.; Kim, Y.-G.; Reynolds, J. R.; Schanze, K. S. Chem. Commun.
2006, 1887-1889.
(10) Weissman, H.; Shirman, E.; Ben-Moshe, T.; Cohen, R.; Leitus, G.; Shimon,
L. J. W.; Rybtchinski, B. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 4790-4792.
(11) Ford, W. E.; Kamat, P. V. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 6373-6380.
(12) Kelley, R. F.; Shin, W. S.; Rybtchinski, B.; Sinks, L. E.; Wasielewski,
M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3173-3181.
(13) Prodi, A.; Chiorboli, C.; Scandola, F.; Iengo, E.; Alessio, E.; Dobrawa,
R.; Wu¨rthner, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1454-1462.
(14) Jime´nez, AÄ . J.; Spa¨nig, F.; Rodr´ıguez-Morgade, M. S.; Ohkubo, K.;
Fukuzumi, S.; Guldi, D. M.; Torres, T. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2481-2484.
(15) Danilov, E. O.; Pomestchenko, I. E.; Kinayyigit, S.; Gentili, P. L.; Hissler,
M.; Ziessel, R.; Castellano, F. N. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 2465-
2471.
(16) Rajasingh, P.; Cohen, R.; Shirman, E.; Shimon, L. J. W.; Rybtchinski, B.
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 5973-5979.
(17) Hua, F.; Kinayyigit, S.; Rachford, A. A.; Shikhova, E. A.; Goeb, S.; Cable,
J. R.; Adams, C. J.; Kirschbaum, K.; Pinkerton, A. A.; Castellano, F. N.
Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 8771-8783.
JA800333Y
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 9, 2008 2767