Mendeleev Commun., 2020, 30, 498–499
Supplementary Materials) in the presence of the catalytic amount
both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The lack of
activity of structurally closely related compounds suggests
halogen bonding to likely play an important role in the bioactivity,
and the importance of the presence of the N-benzyl substituent.
Further studies of 2-amino-3-cyanopyridines are expected to
provide new antibacterial leads along with the understanding of
the mechanism of their action.
of piperidine/piperazine was accompanied by deacetylation
leading to tetrahydropyridine 5. The use of 4-methoxy-
benzylidenemalononitrile with electron-donating substituent in
the same reaction gives product 6 with retained acetyl group.
Previously, 2-amino-3-cyanopyridines have been studied for
a variety of bioactivities, involving anticancer and acetylcholine
esterase inhibitory activity, and as anti-inflammatory agents.15–17
Amongst the synthetic approaches to 2-amino-3-cyanopyridines
those involving multicomponent one-pot reactions forming the
pyridine ring from acyclic precursors are most challenging.15
High yielding synthetic approaches involving malonitrile,
aromatic aldehydes and amines have recently been developed,
facilitating access to a diverse substituent pattern.18,19
The herein considered cyanopyridines 1–6 were tested (at
single concentration of 200 μg ml–1) against Escherichia coli
(Gram-negative) and Bacillus subtilis (Gram-positive) bacteria.
Of these, only compound 3c showed substantial antimicrobial
effect, and it was retested at different concentrations to
determine IC values. Against E. coli, the found MIC value was
577 μg ml–1, and against B. subtilis it was 288 μg ml–1. For
cytotoxicity, we found EC50 of 95 μg ml–1 against the human
MCF-7 cell line.
The authors would like to thank Atash Gurbanov (Baku State
University and Universidade de Lisboa) and Gunay Mamedova
(Baku State University) for their contribution to this work with
X-ray single crystal studies. This work was financially supported
by the Baku State University and Center forAntibiotic Resistance
Research (CARe) at the University of Gothenburg. The NMR
studies were performed using the facilities of Baku State
University and Uppsala University, Department of Chemistry,
BMC and the Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy.
Online Supplementary Materials
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
in the online version at doi: 10.1016/j.mencom.2020.07.031.
References
The observation that compound 3c encompassing a bromine,
but not compound 3a with a hydrogen at the same position,
exhibits antibacterial activity suggested that the bromine
participates in a hydrophobic interaction, acts either as hydrogen
bond acceptor or as a halogen bond donor. The fact that neither
3b nor 3d showed activity against E. coli or B. subtilis indicates
that hydrogen bonding at this position is unlikely to be of impact
for the antibacterial activity of 3c, whereas the comparable
polarity of the OMe-substituted 3b and the Br-substituted 3c
suggested hydrophobicity do not play an important role. Thus,
halogen bonding, which has lately been demonstrated to be often
beneficial for bioactivity, is most likely involved in the
antibacterial activity of 3c.20,21
It should be noted that compounds 1c and 5, also bearing
4-bromophenyl residue yet missing an N-benzyl substituent
lacked antimicrobial activity. It is therefore tempting to assume
that the antimicrobial effect of 3c also depends on a lipophilic
interaction via the N-benzyl group, which due to steric reasons
might not be available for a phenyl substituent of 5. The lack of
activity of 1c may also depend on the unfavorable steric or
electronic effect of its 4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole functionality.
In summary, various 2-amino-3-cyanopyridines are readily
accessible via a one-pot multicomponent reaction. The evaluation
of the antimicrobial activity of a series of derivatives resulted in
the identification of a compound with promising activity against
1 C. Cabrele and O. Reiser, J. Org. Chem., 2016, 81, 10109.
2 A. P. Taylor, R. P. Robinson, Y. M. Fobian, D. C. Blakemore, L. H. Jones
and O. Fadeyi, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2016, 14, 6611.
3 I. G. Mamedov, V. N. Khrustalev, P. V. Doravatovskii, F. N. Naghiev and
A. M. Maharramov, Mendeleev Commun., 2019, 29, 232.
4 M. N. Elinson, F. V. Ryzhkov, A. N. Vereshchagin, T. A. Zaimovskaya,
V. A. Korolev and M. P. Egorov, Mendeleev Commun., 2016, 26, 399.
5 S. V. Chapyshev, S. I. Kuzina and A. I. Mikhailov, Mendeleev Commun.,
2007, 17, 207.
6 F. E. Goda, A. A. Abdel-Aziz and O. A. Attef, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2004,
12, 1845.
7 X. Haihua, L. Pingliang, G. Dongcai, H. Jinhui, C. Yuchao and H. Wei,
Med. Chem. Res., 2014, 23, 1941.
8 H. A. Ashraf, A. A. Dalal, L. Jochen, N. T. Heather, D. G. Bernard,
A. P. Gary and A. O. A. Mohammed, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2010, 45, 90.
9 A. M. E. Amal, A. H. F. Nahla and A. H. S. Gamal, Bioorg. Med. Chem.,
2009, 17, 5059.
10 K. C. Rupert, J. R. Henry, J. H. Dodd, S. A. Wadsworth, D. E. Cavender,
G. C. Olini, B. Fahmy and J. J. Siekierka, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.,
2003, 13, 347.
11 WHO News Release: High Levels of Antibiotic Resistance Round
Worldwide, New Data Shows, January 2018.
12 D. van Duin and Y. Doi, Virulence, 2017, 8, 460.
13 J. O’Neill, Antimicrobial Resistance: Tackling a Crisis for the Health
and Wealth of Nations, The Review on Antimicrobial Resistance,
˙
14 F. N. Naghiyev, A. M. Maharramov, I. M. Akhmedov, Kh. A. Asadov,
A. N. Khalilov, A. V. Gurbanov, G. Z. Mammadova, A. R. Asgarova,
E. Z. Guseynov and I. G. Mamedov, Bulg. Chem. Commun., 2018, 50,
568.
15 M. T. Cocco, C. Congiu, V. Lilliu and V. Onnis, Eur. J. Med. Chem.,
2005, 40, 1365.
16 A. Samadi, M. de la Fuente Revenga, C. Pérez, I. Iriepa, I. Moraleda,
M. I. Rodríguez-Franco and J. Marco-Contelles, Eur. J. Med. Chem.,
2013, 67, 64.
17 A. Samadi, J. Marco-Contelles, E. Soriano, M. Álvarez-Pérez,
M. Chioua, A. Romero, L. González-Lafuente, L. Gandía, J. M. Roda,
M. G. López, M. Villarroya, A. G. García and C. de los Ríos, Bioorg.
Med. Chem., 2010, 18, 5861.
18 N. F. H. Mahmoud and A. El-Sewedy, J. Chem., 2018, 7958739.
19 S. Sarkar, D. K. Das and A. T. Khan, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 53752.
20 R. Wilcken, M. O. Zimmermann, A. Lange, A. C. Joerger and
F. M. Boeckler, J. Med. Chem., 2013, 56, 1363.
†
2,6-Diamino-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-1-(thiophen-2-ylmethyl)-1,4-dihydro-
pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile 4. A mixture of 2-(4-fluorobenzylidene)-
malononitrile (5.1 mmol) and malononitrile (5.2 mmol) were dissolved in
MeOH (35 ml), and this was stirred for 5–7 min. (2-Thienyl)methylamine
(5.2 mmol) was added under vigorous stirring (TLC control, EtOAc/
hexane, 2:1). The reaction was allowed to proceed for 48–72 h. Upon
evaporation of the solvent, the product crystallized and the crystals
precipitated. The crystals were filtered off using filter paper and
recrystallized from a 3:2 EtOH/H2O mixture to afford product 4 in 84%
yield, mp 205 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 3.96 (s, 1H,
CH-10), 5.17 (s, 2H, CH2-6), 6.37 (s, 4H, 2NH2-13/22), 6.65–7.52 (m,
7H, H17–21, H18–20, H-3, H-4, H-2); 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d 39.3 (CH-10), 42.9 (CH2-6), 63.1 (C-9 and C-11), 115.1 (d,
2JC,F 22.5 Hz, C-18 and C-20), 121.6 (CN-14 and CN-15), 126.9 (C-3),
127.4 (C-4), 128.2 (C-2), 128.85 (d, 3JC,F 7.5 Hz, C-17 and C-21), 137.6
21 L. Mendez, G. Henriquez, S. Sirimulla and M. Narayan, Molecules,
2017, 22, 1397.
4
(C-5), 141.7 (d, JC,F 3.0 Hz, C-16), 152.5 (C-8 and C-12), 161.3 (d,
1JC,F 240.8 Hz, C-19). HRMS, m/z: 352.1036 (calc. for C18H14FN5S,
m/z: 352.0954 [M+H]+).
Received: 28th February 2020; Com. 20/6145
– 499 –