Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
cyclopropyl (14), aldehyde (15), ketone (16), alkene (17),
amides (18−20), and hydroxyl group (21) could all be well-
tolerated.
instance, by utilizing it in sequential derivatizations (vide
infra).
In contrast, (hetero)aromatic derivatives were found to be
relatively more stable than the aforementioned aliphatic
terminal enamides. Significantly, (hetero)aromatic terminal
alkynes favored a Markonikov hydroamidation irrespective of
the ligand used, but the complete selectivities were obtained
with the use of a less bulky ligand L2 (39−45). Phenyl-
acetylene (39) and analogous substrates installed with fluoro
(40), trifluoromethyl (41), aldehyde (42), and methoxy (43)
groups were effectively transformed to the Markovnikov
enamide products in good yields and complete regioselectivity.
Likewise, 2- and 3-ethynylthiophenes were viable substrates to
afford enamides 44 and 45, respectively.
The reaction was not limited to terminal alkynes but could
also be applied to internal substrates to furnish α,β-
disubstituted (E)-enamides by a syn addition (46−50).
Symmetric alkynes bearing alkyl (46) or phenyl (47)
substituents could be successfully converted to the correspond-
ing enamides with (E)-selectivity. For unsymmetrical internal
alkynes, the regioselectivity could be controlled by either
sterics (48) or electronics (49 and 50), with the amide
functionality being inserted into the sterically less-demanding
site or that bearing aromatic rings. With these promising
results, it is worthwhile mentioning that the obtained (E)-
configured α,β-disubstituted secondary enamides are challeng-
ing to synthesize in a selective fashion by other means,87,88 as
they are thermodynamically less stable than the (Z)-counter-
parts. Therefore, the ability to incorporate internal alkynes to
access these challenging enamides is one of the appealing
features of our protocol.
Some of the examined functional groups are noteworthy, as
they would often suffer in other types of reactions for enamide
synthesis. For example, carbonyl moieties, such as aldehydes
(15) or ketones (16), might encounter issues in the classical
condensation-type strategies whereby those functional groups
are transformed in reaction with amides.84 The tolerance of a
secondary amide also deserves a special mention (20), as this
kind of functional group within the alkyne motif could prompt
an undesired intramolecular reaction if the traditional hydro-
amidation protocols were utilized.85,86 The compatibility with
the hydroxyl group is another interesting feature, albeit isolated
in reduced yield due to the instability of enamide 21. Despite
the superior functional group tolerance, a few alkynes were
found to be unsuited, including those containing propiolate,
enyne, or unprotected aniline moiety (see Supporting
A range of dioxazolones could also be employed, giving anti-
Markovnikov enamides in similar efficiencies to the standard
substrate. Dioxazolones with simple aliphatic functionality (22
and 23), alkene functionality (24), alkyl benzene (25), alkyl
thiophene (26), and benzylic (27) groups were compatible,
furnishing the corresponding (E)-enamides in good to
excellent selectivities. Hydroamidation with styryl (28) and
aryl (29−31) dioxazolone reactants were also feasible,
however, giving somewhat diminished yields and lower
regioselectivities. The attenuated efficiency in these cases is
attributed to the relative instability of conjugated dioxazolones
under the current Ni conditions, in which their decomposition
may also disturb the selectivity-determining hydrometalation
step by altering the active catalyst.
On the basis of our initial results that the regioselectivity of
the current Ni-catalyzed alkyne hydroamidation can be
switched by the choice of ligands (Table 1), we next explored
the generality of the Markovnikov hydroamidation using
NiBr2·glyme (5 mol %) and L2 (7.5 mol %) in DMPU. This
part of the investigation was highly challenging, as α-alkyl-
substituted terminal enamides expected from the Markovnikov
selectivity are extremely unstable, which may affect the
reaction efficiency and selectivity. Indeed, to our knowledge,
there are no general methods to access such a class of
enamides, thus explicating the lack of their presence in
synthetic applications contrarily to their aromatic counter-
parts.3
Despite this challenge, we could take advantage of the mild
conditions applied in our NiH catalytic system, affording the
aliphatic enamides in good yields and decent selectivities (4,
32−38). Alkyl (4 and 32), cyclopropyl (33), alkyl chloride
(34), acetal (35), imide (36), and benzaldehyde (37) on the
alkyne substrate were tolerated, as well as phenyl dioxazolone
giving rise to N-benzoyl enamide 38 in good yield. However,
the isolation of these enamide products was found to be
difficult because of their instability. In addition, the
regioselectivity was generally lower in comparison to those
achieved for an anti-Markovnikov addition, which could be
partly ascribed to some decomposition of the Markovnikov
products. Nonetheless, the obtained efficiency and selectivity
were gratifying in our case, especially considering the
aforementioned issues with α-alkyl-substituted terminal
enamides. The current strategy for Markovnikov selectivity
is, thus, expected to find useful synthetic applications, for
Synthetic Utility. The practicality of the current NiH-
catalyzed strategy was next demonstrated by a gram-scale
hydroamidation of alkyne 2, which furnished enamide 3 in
good yield (Scheme 5a). With this practical procedure in hand,
the synthetic utility was subsequently explored by derivatiza-
tions of enamide 3. The direct alkyne functionalization by
means of hydroamidation certainly offers a synthetic diversity
in comparison to the semireduction sequential processes, as
enamides represent common access points for the synthesis of
value-added nitrogen-containing compounds.3 In particular,
secondary enamides have been utilized as a versatile
intermediate in various organic transformations. For example,
the acid-catalyzed reaction with indole nucleophile and rac-
1,1′-binaphthyl-2,2′-diyl hydrogen phosphate PA1 as a catalyst
(5 mol %) gave the arylation product 51 in 86% yield (Scheme
5a). The functionalization of the β-carbon of enamides by a
treatment with a suitable electrophile is also a well-known
strategy, and indeed, the Cu-catalyzed oxy-trifluoromethylation
89
+
using Togni’s reagent (CF3 ) and MeOH, followed by a
reduction with hydrosilane, successfully afforded the β-
trifluoromethylated product 52. The acid-catalyzed Povarov
reaction of enamide 3 was also investigated with a range of in
situ generated imines, which resulted in the tetrahydroquino-
line products as single diastereomers (53−55).90
We next examined the hydrogenation of α-alkyl-substituted
terminal enamides obtained from the Markovnikov hydro-
amidation of aliphatic alkynes. We considered this worthy of
investigation given that such a class of enamides is under-
presented in the related chemistry.3 As aforementioned, this is
ascribed to the lack of methods for their syntheses, presumably
due to the issues encountered by the instability. Therefore, we
conceived to prove the viability of our NiH approach for the
5873
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 5867−5877