COMMUNICATIONS
Herrmann, Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2073 ± 2074; f) N. P. Reddy, M.
Tanaka, Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 4807± 4810.
Application of a Spin-Labeled Spin-Trap to the
Detection of Nitric Oxide 'NO)**
[4] a) C. Desmarets, R. Schneider, Y. Fort, Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
2875 ± 2879; b) E. Brenner, R. Schneider, Y. Fort, Tetrahedron Lett.
2000, 41, 2881 ± 2884; c) J. P. Wolfe, S. L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 6054 ± 6058; d) R. Cramer, D. R. Coulson, J. Org. Chem.
1975, 40, 2267± 2273.
[5] K. Hori, M. Mori, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7651 ± 7652.
[6] For aromatic aminations a) in the absence of solvent, see: L. Schio, G.
Lemoine, M. Klich, Synlett 1999, 1559 ± 1562; b) under high pressure,
see: H. Kotski, H. Sakai, T. Shinohara, Synlett 2000, 116 ± 118; c) by
nucleophilic substitution, see: A. J. Belfield, G. R. Brown, A. J.
Foubister, P. D. Ratcliffe, Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 13285 ± 13300.
[7] G. V. Smith, F. Notheisz in Heterogeneous Catalysis in Organic
Chemistry, Academic Press, San Diego, 1999.
[8] a) J. S. Bradley, B. Tesche, W. Busser, M. Maase, M. T. Reetz, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4631 ± 4636; b) M. T. Reetz, E. Westermann,
Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 170 ± 173; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
165 ± 168; c) M. T. Reetz, R. Breinbauer, P. Wedemann, P. Binger,
Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 1233 ± 1240.
[9] a) B. H. Lipshutz, P. A. Blomgren, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5819 ±
5820; b) B. H. Lipshutz, T. Tomioka, P. A. Blomgren, J. Sclafani,
Inorg. Chim. Acta 1999, 296, 164 ± 169; c) B. H. Lipshutz, J. A.
Sclafani, P. A. Blomgren, Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 2139 ± 2144.
[10] It was important to maintain a strong reflux, which was accomplished
by setting the oil bath temperature to 1308C.
Â
Lucien Marx and Andre Rassat*
When a dilute monoradical reacts to give diamagnetic
products, its EPR signal decays without major changes, while
when a diradical is transformed into a monoradical, a new
EPR spectrum is generally observed. In the case of a diradical
with strong dipolar interaction,[1] the single broad line is
replaced by three narrow lines, and there is a very large
increase of the monoradical signal. A narrow-line monorad-
ical in very low concentration and a broad-line diradical in
much higher concentration display peaks of similar height,[2]
as shown in Figure 1 where the EPR spectra of synthetic
mixtures of tempone ?2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-oxo-1-oxypiperi-
dine ?radical); line width DH 0.18 mT) and of diradical 1[3]
?DH 4.2 mT) are presented: even when the monoradical
constitutes only 0.1% of the total paramagnetic species, its
signal can be detected.
[11] D. Guillaneux, H. B. Kagan, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2502 ± 2505.
[12] A similar observation has been made in the case of 2,2'-bis?diphenyl-
phosphanyl)-1,1'-binaphthyl ?BINAP) and its monodentate ana-
logue.[2a] By contrast, in refluxing dioxane ?5% Ni/C, LiOtBu, 18 h),
use of 2.5% DPPF led to 95% conversion.
[13] M. Prashad, B. Hu, Y. Lu, R. Draper, D. Har, O. Repic, T. J. Blacklock,
J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 2612 ± 2614.
[14] B. Witulski, Synlett 1999, 1223 ± 1226.
[15] S. Djuric, J. Venit, P. Magnus, Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 1787 ± 1790.
Commercially available from Gelest.
[16] Representative procedure for the amination of aryl chlorides ?Table 1,
entry 1): NiII/C ?50.5 mg, 0.038 mmol, 0.74 mmolgÀ1), DPPF ?10.7mg,
0.019 mmol), and lithium tert-butoxide ?74.3 mg, 0.90 mmol) were
added to a flame-dried 5 mL round-bottomed flask under a blanket of
argon at room temperature. Dry toluene ?0.5 mL) was added by
syringe and the slurry allowed to stir for 90 min. n-Butyllithium
?31 mL, 2.42m in hexanes, 0.075 mmol) was added dropwise with
swirling. After 30 min, 4-chlorobenzonitrile ?104.2 mg, 0.75 mmol),
which was dissolved in dry toluene ?0.5 mL), and morpholine ?132 mL,
1.50 mmol) were added, followed by heating to reflux for 2.5 h ?the oil
bath temperature was set to 1308C). After cooling to room temper-
ature, the crude reaction mixture was then filtered through a glass
filter and the filter cake further washed with methanol and dichloro-
methane. The filtrate was collected, solvents were removed on a
rotary evaporator and the crude product was then purified by flash
chromatography with cyclohexane/EtOH ?7/3) to give 123.8 mg
?0.66 mmol; 88%) N-?4-cyanophenyl)-morpholine as a pale yellow
solid.[4c]
Figure 1. EPR spectra of ethanol solutions of synthetic mixtures contain-
ing ?from top to bottom) 0, 0.1, 0.5, and 1 mole% of tempone relative to
10À3 m diradical 1.
This suggests a new use of diradicals as spin-labeled spin-
traps. These reagents would combine a stable radical ?RT),
designed to trap selectively the radical to be detected and to
yield diamagnetic products, and another radical ?RL), un-
reactive during this reaction, at a distance such that the
diradical EPR spectrum would be a single line.[4] In this way,
as RT reacts, the signal of the RL moiety would be detected at
the very beginning of the reaction, with both the concen-
tration of spin trap and of spin adduct being monitored on the
same spectrum. Furthermore, the rate of the trapping reaction
?usually bimolecular) could easily be increased by increasing
the biradical concentration.
[17] The extent of nickel bleed from the charcoal was quantitatively
assessed to be 2.3 ± 2.9% of the 5% Ni/C ?i.e., 0.15% relative to
substrate) using inductively coupled plasma ?ICP) atomic emission
spectrometry. For an overview of this technique, see: Inductively
Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry ?Ed.: A. Montaser), Wiley-VCH,
New York, 1998.
[*] Prof. A. Rassat, Dr. L. Marx
Â
UMR CNRS 8640, Departement de Chimie
Â
Ecole Normale Superieure
24 rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris CEDEX 05 ?France)
Fax : ?33)144323325
[**] This work was supported by the French Ministry of Education ?ENS),
the French Ministry of Defense, and CNRS.
4494
ꢀ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, 2000
1433-7851/00/3924-4494 $ 17.50+.50/0
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, No. 24