valuable for the assembly of the core unit of the structurally
unique alkaloid, himandrine, 3.8
The studies described here were motivated by the realiza-
tion that the spirocyclic core of 3 may be brought within
the scope of oxidative amidation chemistry as adumbrated
in Scheme 2. Indeed, a key subunit of 3 is embedded in
1310 with commercial 2-chloroethylsulfonyl chloride and with
1-(1,3-butadien)ylsulfonyl chloride,11 followed by desilylation
(Scheme 3). While the original procedure for the oxidative
Scheme 3. Substrates for Ortho-Oxidative Amidation
Scheme 2. Retrosynthetic Hypotheses for Himandrine
cyclization of similar substrates utilized costly hexafluoroiso-
propanol as the solvent,3d we found that the reaction proceeds
as efficiently, if not better, in neat trifluoroacetic acid (TFA).
Treatment of 16-17 with DIB in TFA thus furnished 18-19.
This is an example of ortho-oxidative amidation of phenols.12
Chromatographic purification of these sensitive materials caused
unacceptable losses. We found it expedient to dilute the crude
reaction mixture with toluene and heat to reflux to induce IMDA
cyclization. Products 20-21 emerged in 40% and 34% yield
after chromatography,13 and their structures were ascertained
by X-ray diffractometry.14 Somewhat surprisingly, the sulfonyl-
diene moiety of 19 had thus behaved exclusively as a dienophile,
while the dienone played the role of the diene, presumably
thanks to its constrained s-cis-type diene geometry. The finding
that 19 cyclizes to form exclusively a bicyclo[2.2.2]octenone
system, and none of the desired product of the type 5 (R ) H),
signaled the demise of pathway b.
intermediates 4-6, each one of which, in turn, could
conceivably derive from the oxidative cyclization of a
phenolic sulfonamide,3d followed by IMDA reaction. An
oxy-Cope rearrangement9 (cf. 7) would also be required to
elaborate 8 into 4. We note that the decalin segment of 3
displays the trans ring junction, whereas the sequences
leading to 4-6 would produce the cis-fused diastereomers.
An MM+ study indicated that the trans-isomers of 4-6 were
considerably more stable (∆E > 4 kcal/mol). We thus
anticipated that 5 and 6 would epimerize to the trans-isomers
under mildly basic conditions, while 4 could be epimerized
after conversion into an enone of the type 5.
The investigation of pathway a continued with compound
20, which according to the logic of Scheme 2 would now
undergo addition of a vinyl nucleophile to the CdO group.
Unexpectedly, this reaction was problematic. Thus, vinylmag-
nesium bromide in THF, with or without added HMPA or other
promoters, such as TMEDA15 or CeCl3,16 as well as vinyl-
lithium prepared from either vinyltributyl tin/BuLi17 or tetravinyl
(10) Prepared as detailed in the Supporting Information.
(11) Lee, Y. S.; Ryu, E. K.; Yun, K.-Y.; Kim, Y. H. Synlett 1996, 247.
This method furnishes a mixture of trans- and cis-isomers. Remarkably,
these were chromatographically separable with only modest losses (see the
Supporting Information).
The exploration of pathways a-b required compounds 16
and 17, which were obtained respectively by reaction of amine
(8) Isolation: (a) Brown, R. F. C.; Drummond, R.; Fogerty, A. C.;
Hughes, G. K.; Pinhey, J. T.; Ritchie, E.; Taylor, W. C. Aust. J. Chem.
1956, 9, 283. Bioactivity: (b) Cobbin, L. B.; Thorp, R. H. Aust. J. Exptl.
Biol. Med. Sci. 1957, 35, 15. Structural work: (c) Guise, G. B.; Mander,
L. N.; Prager, R. H.; Rasmussen, M.; Ritchie, E.; Taylor, W. C. Aust.
J. Chem. 1967, 20, 1029. (d) Willis, A. C.; O’Connor, P. D.; Taylor, W. C.;
Mander, L. N. Aust. J. Chem. 2006, 59, 629. Synthetic studies: O’Connor,
P. D.; Mander, L. N.; McLachlan, M. M. W. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 703. Total
synthesis: Movassaghi, M.; Tjandra, M.; Qi, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009,
131, 9648.
(12) For the first example of ortho-oxidative amidation of phenols see:
Canesi, S. Dissertation, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 2004.
(13) For a similar reaction see: Drutu, I.; Njardarson, J. T.; Wood, J. L.
Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 493.
(14) The structure of 20 is published: Liang, H.; Canesi, S.; Patrick,
B. O.; Ciufolini, M. A. Z. Kristallogr.-New Cryst. Struct. 2009, 224, 83.
(15) Collum, D. B. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 448.
(16) Imamoto, T.; Takiyama, N.; Nakamura, K.; Hatajima, T.; Kamiya,
Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4392.
(9) Key reviews: (a) Paquette, L. A. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 13971. (b)
Toure, B. B.; Hall, D. G. Chem. ReV. 2009, 109, 4439. See also ref 22.
(17) Seyferth, D.; Weiner, M. A.; Vaughan, L. G.; Raab, G.; Welch,
D. E.; Cohen, H. M.; Alleston, D. L. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1963, 7, 1364.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 8, 2010
1761