Organic Letters
Letter
were pleased to find that the anticipated [4 + 3]
decarboxylative annulation could be efficiently completed
under the optimal catalytic conditions composed of
PdCl2(PPh3)2 and K2CO3 in DMSO at 140 °C, delivering
product 3aa in 85% yield (entry 1). A screening of palladium
catalysts, such as PdCl2(dppf), Pd(OAc)2, PdCl2, and
Pd(dba)2, demonstrated that all of them were inferior to
PdCl2(PPh3)2 in terms of the yield (entries 2−5).
Subsequently, several P ligands, including P(o-tol)3, Pt-Bu3,
PCy3, and dppf, were investigated and were found to have a
negative effect on this [4 + 3] annulation reaction (entries 6−
8). Moreover, attempts to use other bases, namely, Cs2CO3,
K3PO4, NaOAc, and NaHCO3, did not provide a better
outcome (entries 9−11). Notably, we found that the nature of
the solvents was crucial for the reaction: Compared with
DMSO, using DMF as the medium showed similar efficiency
(entry 12), and the substitution of MeCN afforded a lower
yield (entry 13), whereas replacing DMSO with toluene led to
no product formation (entry 14). Finally, the change in
reaction temperature did not improve the yield (entries 15 and
16). Pleasingly, the reaction is applicable to being scaled up to
1 mmol of 1a, affording 78% of 3aa (entry 1).
After identifying the optimal reaction conditions, we set out
to investigate the substrate scope of this transformation
(Scheme 2, top). The reactivity of the halogen atom was
initially checked. Gratifyingly, 2-bromobiphenyl and 2-(2-
chlorophenyl)acrylic underwent [4 + 3] decarboxylative
annulation to afford product 3aa in 50 and 80% yield,
respectively, whereas 2-(2-iodophenyl)acrylic acid was un-
reactive. A wide range of 2-iodobiphenyls 1b−i bearing
symmetrical substituents were then investigated. Delightedly,
this protocol exhibited good functional group tolerance.
Various substituents, such as Me, OMe, F, Cl, CF3, and CN,
could survive under the reaction conditions (3ba−ia). The
regioselective formation of products 3ba−ea revealed that the
C−H activation process was controlled by steric hindrance.
The structure of 3da was unequivocally confirmed by X-ray
Several unsymmetrical substrates, such as monosubstituted,
disubstituted, and heterocyclic 2-iodobiaryls, were also ex-
plored to better understand the mechanism. All of them could
proceed smoothly to deliver a mixture of regioisomers 3ja−ma
in good overall yields. These results indicated that intermediate
D/D′ could be generated by the reductive elimination of
intermediate C with poor regioselectivity.
Next, the scope with respect to 2-(2-bromophenyl)acrylic
acids 2 was examined (Scheme 2, bottom). Satisfactorily, a
series of 2-(2-bromophenyl)acrylic acids with different func-
tional groups on the benzene ring were subjected to the
standard conditions, delivering decarboxylative annulation
products 3ab−ag in 55−92% yield. However, substrate 2h
with a phenyl group at the three-position of the acrylic acids
underwent the [4 + 3] annulation to produce product 3ah in
only 15% yield. It is worth noting that 8-bromo-1-naphthoic
acid was also a viable coupling partner, leading to the
formation of product 3ai in a 45% yield.
The Suzuki−Miyaura reaction has become a powerful tool
for the assembly of biphenyl derivatives. We envision that a [2
+ 2 + 3] decarboxylative annulation for the synthesis of
tribenzo[7]annulenes could be realized by the Suzuki coupling
of 1,2-halobenzenes and phenylboronic acids followed by the
reaction with acrylic acids 2. To verify our hypothesis, we
performed the reaction of 1-bromo-2-iodobenzene 4a, phenyl-
Scheme 1. [4 + x] Annulations of 2-Iodobiphenyls
of our ongoing interest in the palladium-catalyzed C−H
functionalization of aryl iodides,13 we herein report a new
palladium-catalyzed [4 + 3] annulation of 2-iodobiphenyls with
2-(2-halophenyl)acrylic acids for assembling tribenzo[7]-
annulenes via C−H activation and subsequent decarboxylation
(Scheme 1B). Moreover, tribenzo[7]annulenes can also be
synthesized via a [2 + 2 + 3] decarboxylative annulation of 1,2-
halobenzenes, phenylboronic acids, and 2-(2-halophenyl)-
acrylic acids. Notably, this unique seven-membered carbon
ring framework has rarely been reported to date.14
We began our studies by investigating the reaction of 2-
iodobiphenyl (1a) with 2-(2-bromophenyl)acrylic acid (2a)
(Table 1). After a general survey of the reaction parameters, we
a
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions
b
entry
variation from the standard conditions
yield (%)
c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
none
85 (78)
66
50
47
56
69
83
67
63
76
81
81
60
trace
77
82
PdCl2(dppf) instead of PdCl2(PPh3)2
Pd(OAc)2 instead of PdCl2(PPh3)2
PdCl2 instead of PdCl2(PPh3)2
Pd(dba)2 instead of PdCl2(PPh3)2
P(o-tol)3 (10 mol %) was added
Pt-Bu3 or PCy3 (10 mol %) was added
dppf (5 mol %) was added
Cs2CO3 instead of K2CO3
K3PO4 or NaOAc instead of K2CO3
NaHCO3 instead of K2CO3
DMF instead of DMSO
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MeCN instead of DMSO
toluene instead of DMSO
at 130 °C
at 150 °C
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (1.1 equiv), PdCl2(PPh3)2
(5 mol %), K2CO3 (3 equiv), and DMSO (2 mL) at 140 °C under N2
b
c
for 2 h. Isolated yield. 1a (1 mmol) and DMSO (8 mL) were used.
2611
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 2610−2615