ꢀ
148
M. Amezquita-Valencia, A. Cabrera / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 768 (2014) 145e150
Table 5
Table 6
Hydrogenation of enamine 1a with various chiral bidentate phosphines.a
Asymmetric hydrogenation of b
-enamines using Co/(R)-BINAP/PPh3.a
Entry
Chiral ligand
Yield (%)b
ee (%)c
1
2
3
4
5
(R)-Tol-BINAP
(R)-H8-BINAP
(R,R)-DIOP
(R,R)-Me-DuPHOS
(R)-PROPHOS
76
73
70
72
74
1
2
2
3
1
a
Reaction conditions: 0.37 mmol of 1a enamine,
1
mol% of Co2(CO)8
(0.0037 mmol), ligands: Chiral ligand (L*) (0.0075 mmol) and PPh3 (L)
(0.0075 mmol), 10 mL THF, H2/CO (1:3, 450 psi), 120 ꢀC, 36 h.
Entry
R1
R2
Product
Yield (%)b
ee (%)c
b
Isolated yield.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
2g
2h
2i
2j
2k
2l
2m
2n
2o
2p
2q
2r
93
85
91
90
89
93
92
89
91
88
90
89
82
86
89
84
93
87
80
88
85
82
86
22
37
7
7
5
c
Determined by HPLC analysis with Daicel chiralcel OD-H column.
p-MeO
p-Me
p-Cl
PPh3 ligand was used (entry 1, Table 4 vs. entry 13, Table 3).
Changing the substituent position on the ligand resulted in a
poor yield (entry 2). This behavior could be associated with a
steric effect in the heterocombination generated with L2 and (R)-
BINAP (entry 3), making it impossible to form a mixed ligand
species; a similar result was obtained with ligand L3 (entry 4). In
contrast, good yields were obtained with triphenylphosphite L4
and triphenylstibine L5 as ligands. Unfortunately, all previous
heterocombinations did not improve the enantioselectivity of the
reaction. In addition, we explored the use of five different chiral
bidentate phosphine ligands (L*) in combination with triphe-
nylphosphine (L) in the hydrogenation of 1a. The reaction was
carried out with a Co/L*/L ratio of 1:2:2 in tetrahydrofuran under
450 psi (H2/CO) pressure and 120 ꢀC for 36 h. The results are
summarized in Table 5. Regrettably, low enantioselectivity was
obtained using the different bidentate ligands. Even so, the cat-
alytic systems showed a decrease in catalytic activity (entries
1e5).
p-F
m-Me
m-Cl
o-Me
o-MeO
o-Et
o-Br
o-OH
H
19
5
19
38
6
32
26
18
20
7
43
21
4
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
p-MeO
p-MeO
p-MeO
p-MeO
p-MeO
p-MeO
p-MeO
p-MeO
p-MeO
p-Me
p-Me
p-MeO
p-Me
p-Cl
p-F
m-Me
m-Cl
o-Me
o-Et
H
p-Cl
2s
2t
2u
2v
2w
6
25
15
24
32
a
Reaction conditions: 0.37 mmol of enamine 1aew,
1
mol% of Co2(CO)8
(0.0037 mmol), (R)-BINAP (0.0075 mmol) and PPh3 (0.0075 mmol), ratio ¼ 1/2/2,
In summary, the best results were obtained using Co2(CO)8/(R)-
BINAP/PPh3 (1:2:2) under 450 psi of pressure with 1 mol% of
catalyst loading in tetrahydrofuran for 36 h. Using this optimized
catalytic system, we explored the scope of the hydrogenation re-
10 mL THF, H2/CO (1:3, 450 psi), 120 ꢀC, 36 h.
b
Isolated yield.
c
Determined by HPLC analysis with Daicel chiralcel OD-H and OD columns.
action using various N-aryl
b-enamino esters; the results are
summarized in Table 6. In general, good yields were obtained (up to
93%). The results revealed that the substitution on the aromatic ring
of the substrate has no effect on the reaction yield. Similarly, the
hydrogenation reaction tolerated both electron-donating and
electron-withdrawing groups on the substrate, whereas enantio-
meric excesses were affected for the substituent position. Thus, in
the absence of a substituent on R2, good yields were obtained with
moderate ee% values (entries 1, 13 and 22). However, the existence
of a p-MeO group on R2 presented a slight increase in enantiose-
lectivity (entries 2 and 14), while the reaction proceeded with poor
enantioselectivity in the presence of p-Me (entries 3 and 15).
When the reaction was realized with substrates containing p-Cl
or p-F groups, the desired products resulted but with lower ee%
(entries 4e5). In contrast, p-MeO and p-Me substituents attached to
the benzoylacetate moiety in combination with p-Cl or p-F on the
amine moiety gave the best enantioselectivity (entries 16 and 17
and 23). This increase in enantiomeric excess may be attributed to
the electronic effects associated with the substituent in position R1.
meta Substituents on the amine moiety were also tested; however,
low values of ee% were obtained (entries 6 and 7, 18 and 19).
Notably, substituents on the ortho position of the amine moiety
provided the product with an increased ee% value. The small
improvement in the ee could be associated with both electronic
and steric effects of the substituent at the ortho position, although a
lower ee% was obtained when the substituent was changed from a
methyl to an ethyl group (entries 8e12, and 20 and 21).
of triphenylphosphine (0.1 mmol) to a solution of Co2(CO)8
(0.1 mmol) in THF resulted in the PPh3Co(CO)7 (I) complex (Eq. (1)).
Then, 0.1 mmol of (R)-BINAP was added to a solution of complex I,
resulting in the expected product (II). Compound II is a brown
powder that is thermally stable at atmospheric pressure but de-
composes in solution at 25 ꢀC. Crystals of II were grown by layering
a saturated tetrahydrofuran solution of II with pentene. The 31P
NMR spectrum of (II) crystals showed three signals at
d 29.2, 28.7,
28.4 ppm corresponding to BINAP and PPh3. A few minutes later
two new signals can be observed (ꢁ5.1 ppm PPh3 and ꢁ14.2 ppm
BINAP free). This behavior is associated with decoordination of the
ligands present in molecule II.
(1)
The IR spectrum of II showed four absorptions representing CO
stretching frequencies at 2046, 2028, 1993 and 1934 cmꢁ1, which
could be assigned to COterminal groups. The molecular structure is
shown in Fig. 1. Compound II crystallizes in the triclinic space group
P-1 and displays a dinuclear arrangement in which the phosphine
ligands are observed in anti-position with respect to the CoeCo
bond. This structure reveals two different phosphine ligands and
five terminal carbonyls forming a distorted trigonal bipyramidal
geometry around the Co atoms. The length of the Co(2)e
P(3) ¼ 2.188(17) bond is comparable with different complexes re-
ported in the literature [24]. In addition, the Co(1)eCo(2)e
P(3) ¼ 161.796(6)ꢀ angle indicates a slight deviation from linearity.
Finally, in order to probe the participation of the hetero-
combination from cobalt in the hydrogenation reaction, we decided
to synthesize a non-symmetrical cobalt complex. First, the addition