Full Paper
sidered,[50] which included polarisation functions for all atoms. All
calculations were carried out by using the Gaussian 09 package.[51]
For the ground electronic state, the geometries of all stationary
points (minima and transition states) were localised upon direct
optimisation. In the first excited electronic state, the minima were
also directly minimised, whereas the transition states were located
as maxima of reaction coordinates. The second singlet excited
state was constructed as vertical single-point calculations from the
relaxed structures of S1. For the reaction coordinates, the O1ÀH1
distance was used for the intramolecular proton transfer process in
compound 3, whereas the H1ÀO2 and H3ÀN2 distances were used
for compound 5. For both molecules, the C2-N1-N2-C3 and N2-N1-C2-
C1 dihedral angles were used for internal rotations (see Figure 9 for
atom numbering). The calculations were first carried out for the
isolated molecule (gas phase) and later with solvent by using the
polarisable continuum model (PCM),[52–54] in which the HO-ABs
were placed inside a cavity of implicit water solvent. All optimisa-
tions and reaction coordinates were repeated inside the solvent
cavity. For compound 5, explicit water molecules were used, as ob-
tained from a molecular dynamics trajectory of 5 in a cubic box of
TIP3P water molecules[55] by using the Amber 10 package[56] and
Generalized Amber Force Field.[57]. After 10 ns of equilibration at
a constant pressure and temperature of 1 atm and 300 K, respec-
tively, we manually selected the smallest cluster of water molecules
that connected the ÀOH donor and ÀN acceptor groups of com-
pound 5. Stationary points were identified through frequency cal-
culations in the ground and first singlet excited electronic states.
Synthesis of 4
Nitrosobenzene (0.50 g, 4.67 mmol) was dissolved in acetic acid
(30 mL). 3-Aminophenol (0.51 g, 4.67 mmol) was added to the
green solution and the mixture was stirred for 24 h under an
argon atmosphere. The solvent was removed under pressure and
the product was isolated by column chromatography (CH/EE 9:1)
1
to yield 4 (0.67 g, 3.41 mmol, 73%). H NMR (500 MHz, [D6]DMSO):
d=9.87 (s, 1H; -OH), 7.88–7.86 (m, 2H; Har), 7.60–7.55 (m, 3H; Har),
7.40–7.39 (m, 2H; Har), 7.27–7.26 (m, 1H; Har), 6.99–6.96 ppm (m,
1H; Har); 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, [D6]DMSO): d=158.3, 153.2, 151.9,
131.5, 130.2, 129.5, 122.5, 118.8, 115.5, 107.2 ppm; HRMS (MALDI):
m/z calcd for C12H10N2O [M]+: 199.08659; found: 199.08651 (Dm
0.00008, error 0.40 ppm).
Synthesis of 5
Nitrosobenzene (0.50 g, 4.67 mmol) was dissolved in acetic acid
(30 mL). 4-Aminophenol (0.51 g, 4.67 mmol) was added to the
green solution and the mixture was stirred for 24 h under an
argon atmosphere. The solvent was removed under pressure and
the product was isolated by column chromatography (CH/EE 9:1)
1
to yield 5 (0.73 g, 3.69 mmol, 79%). H NMR (500 MHz, [D6]DMSO):
d=10.31 (s, 1H; -OH), 7.82–7.80 (m, 4H; Har), 7.57–7.54 (m, 2H;
Har), 7.50–7.49 (m, 1H; Har), 6.96–6.94 ppm (m, 2H; Har); 13C NMR
(125.8 MHz, [D6]DMSO): d=161.0, 152.1, 145.2, 130.5, 129.3, 124.9,
122.1, 115.9 ppm; HRMS (MALDI): m/z calcd for C12H10N2O [M]+:
199.08659; found: 199.08667 (Dm 0.00008, error 0.40 ppm).
Acknowledgements
Synthesis of 2
Sulfasalazine (0.50 g, 1.26 mmol) was added to acetic anhydride
(3 mL) and the reaction mixture was heated for 3 h. The solvent
was removed under pressure and the product was isolated by
column chromatography (cyclohexane (CH)/ethyl acetate (EE) 1:1)
We thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) for fi-
nancial support through SFB 902 “Molecular Principles of RNA-
Based Regulation”.
1
to yield 2 (0.27 g, 0.56 mmol, 45%). H NMR (500 MHz, [D6]DMSO):
d=13.55 (s, 1H; -COOH), 8.71–8.69 (m, 1H; Har), 8.46–8.45 (d, J=
2.4 Hz, 1H; Har), 8.29–8.22 (m, 3H; Har), 8.16–8.11 (m, 3H; Har), 7.79–
7.78 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 1H; Har), 7.66–7.63 (m, 1H; Har), 7.51–7,49 (d, J=
8.6 Hz, 1H; Har), 2.31 (s, 3H; -CH3), 1.81 ppm (s, 3H, -CH3); 13C NMR
(75.5 MHz, [D6]DMSO): d=169.6, 169.0, 164.9, 154.4, 152.8, 150.0,
149.4, 149.2, 140.2, 139.8, 130.1, 128.1, 126.0, 125.50, 125.45,
125.43, 125.3, 123.0, 24.4, 20.8 ppm; HRMS (MALDI): m/z calcd for
C22H18N4O7SK [M+K]+: 521.05278; found: 521.05222 (Dm 0.00056,
error 0.11 ppm).
Keywords: azobenzenes · tautomerism · photochemistry ·
time-resolved spectroscopy · water chemistry
´
[1] W. Szymanski, J. M. Beierle, H. A. V. Kistemaker, W. A. Velema, B. L. Ferin-
ga, Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 6114–6178.
[2] C. Brieke, F. Rohrbach, A. Gottschalk, G. Mayer, A. Heckel, Angew. Chem.
[4] Y. Zhao, T. Ikeda, Smart Light-Responsive Materials: Azobenzene-Contain-
ing Polymers and Liquid Crystals, Wiley, 2009.
[12] J. Bredenbeck, J. Helbing, A. Sieg, T. Schrader, W. Zinth, C. Renner, R.
[13] S. Spçrlein, H. Carstens, H. Satzger, C. Renner, R. Behrendt, L. Moroder,
P. Tavan, W. Zinth, J. Wachtveitl, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99,
7998–8002.
[14] U. Kusebauch, S. A. Cadamuro, H.-J. Musiol, M. O. Lenz, J. Wachtveitl, L.
Synthesis of 3
Nitrosobenzene (0.50 g, 4.67 mmol) was dissolved in acetic acid
(30 mL). 2-Aminophenol (0.51 g, 4.67 mmol) was added to the
green solution and the mixture was stirred for 24 h under an
argon atmosphere. The solvent was removed under reduced pres-
sure and the product was isolated by column chromatography
1
(CH/EE 40:1) to yield 3 (0.47 g, 2.39 mmol, 51%). H NMR (500 MHz,
[D6]DMSO): d=11.18 (s, 1H; -OH), 7.99–7.97 (m, 2H; Har), 7.77–7.75
(dd, J=8.05, 1H; Har), 7.61–7.55 (m, 3H; Har), 7.44–7.41 (m, 1H; Har),
7.08–7.06 (m, 1H; Har), 7.03–6.99 ppm (m, 1H; Har); 13C NMR
(125.8 MHz, [D6]DMSO): d=154.4, 151.4, 138.3, 133.6, 131.3, 129.4,
123.2, 122.6, 119.8, 118.2 ppm; HRMS (MALDI): m/z calcd for
C12H10N2O [M]+: 199.08659; found: 199.08654 (Dm 0.00005, error
0.25 ppm).
Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 15720 – 15731
15730
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim