309
4.2.9. Antiamnesic activity
References
Antiamnesic activity was studied in BALB/c mice in
passive avoidance response (PAR) tests according to De
Wied [36]. Amnesia was induced by electroconvulsive
shock (ECS). The following method was used. PAR
training was started by placing the mice individually into
the lighted side of the two-compartment (light-dark) PAR
apparatus (Model Nr. 7530, Ugo Basile, Italy). Following
10 min accommodation in the light compartment, the
door was opened to provide access to the dark compart-
ment. Once a mouse moved into the dark compartment
(the first entry latency was measured), the door was
closed completely. Mice not entering the dark compart-
ment within 90 s were removed from experiment. After
5 s an inescapable foot-shock (1.0 mA, 5s) was applied
immediately through the steel grid floor of the dark
compartment. Then the mouse was removed from dark
compartment and electroshocked (50 mA, 0.2 s) through
corneal electrodes and returned to its home cage. The
latency to enter the dark compartment after 24 hrs
followed the foot-shock trial (the retention test or the
second entry). The latter procedure was performed in the
same manner as previously (according to the experimen-
tal schedule), with the exception that the foot-shock was
not applied. An access to the dark compartment was
provided for 3 min. The difference between latencies of
the second and the first entries in the ECS-shocked mice
served as a parameter showing the antiamnesic activity.
Piracetam at 5 and 50 mg/kg was used as a reference. The
mean values ± SEM were statistically evaluated by Stu-
dent’s t-test using P < 0.05 as the difference criterion (vs.
saline and Piracetam controls).
[1] Kuwada Y., Meguro K., Sato Y., Fugono T., Ger. Offen. 2 435 025
(1975); Chem. Abstr. 82 (1975) 156 252.
[2] Tahara T., Hamasaki T., Japan kokai 75 140 487 (1975); Chem.
Abstr. 85 (1976) 21 428.
[3] Rainay J.L., Seidel M.C., US Pat. 3 965 107 (1976); Chem. Abstr. 85
(1976) 160 072.
[4] Awad I.M.A., Abdel-Rahman A.E., Bakhite E.A., Phosphorus Sulfur
Silicon Relat. Elem. 57 (1991) 293–301.
[5] Paronikian Y.G., Mirzoyan G.V., Noravian A.S., Avakamian D.A.,
Ter-zakarian Y.Z., Khim-Farm. Zh. 27 (1993) 29–32.
[6] Freeman P.F.H., US Pat 3 674 877 (1972); Chem. Abstr. 77 (1972)
88 314.
[7] Guerrera F., Salerno L., Sarva M.C., Siracusa M.A., Farmaco. Ed.
Sci. 48 (1993) 1725–1733.
[8] Mortikov V.Y., Litvinov V.P., Shestopalov A.M., Sharanin Y.A.,
Apenova E.E., Galegov G.A., Abdullaev I.I., Asadullaev T.B.,
Abdullaev F.I., Khim-Farm. Zh. 25 (1991) 41–44.
[9] Bousuet E., Romeo G., Guerrera F., Caruso A., Amico-Roxas M.,
Farmaco. Ed. Sci. 40 (1985) 869–874.
[10] Dave C.G., Shah P.R., Shah A.B., Dave K.C., Patal V.J., J. Ind.
Chem. Soc. 66 (1989) 48–50.
[11] Wilson J.D., Youssefyel R.D., US Pat. 4 239 887 (1980); Chem.
Abstr. 94 (1981) 139 849.
[12] Youssefyel R.D., US Pat 4 355 164 (1982); Chem. Abstr. 98 (1983)
89 377.
[13] Youssefyel R.D., Brown R.E., Wilson J.D., Shah U., Jones H., Loev
B., Khandwala A., Leibowitz M.J., Sonnino-Goldman P., J. Med.
Chem. 27 (1984) 1639–1643.
[14] Wagner G., Vieweg H., Leistner S., Bohm N., Krasselt U., Hanfelt
V., Prantz J., Pharmazie 45 (1990) 102–109.
[15] Bohm N., Krasselt U., Leistner S., Wagner G., Pharmazie 47 (1992)
897–901.
[16] Vieweg H., Leistner S., Wagner G., Pharmazie 47 (1992) 914–916.
[17] Wagner G., Leistner S., Vieweg H., Krasselt U., Prant J., Pharmazie
48 (1993) 342–346.
[18] Wagner G., Leistner S., Vieweg H., Krasselt U., Prant J., Pharmazie
48 (1993) 514–518.
4.2.10. Open field test
[19] Wagner G., Vieweg H., Leistner S., Pharmazie 48 (1993) 576–578.
[20] Wagner G., Vieweg H., Leistner S., Pharmazie 48 (1993) 667–669.
Open field tests in BALB/c mice were estimated 1 h
after the compounds 1, 3 and 5a p.o. were administered
(saline for the control group) as described earlier [37].
The animals were placed into the brightly illuminated (60
W bulb, 1 m above the centre of the area) black-painted
regular octagonal-shaped (diagonal length of 36 cm)
wooden box. The black floor was divided into eight equal
triangle-shaped sections. The animals were allowed
1 min of habituation to the experimental conditions in
order to minimise interference with additional stress
factors. Subsequently, horizontal activity (passage of
horizontal lines with all four paws), vertical activity (the
number of rearings) and exploratory activity (hole inspec-
tion in the vertical walls) were registered as a number of
corresponding locomotor activities. The results were
expressed as means ± SEM, and a probability level of
P < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant (vs.
saline control values, Student’s t-test).
[21] Fujikava Y., Susuki M., Iwasaki H., Sakashita M., Kitahara M., Eur.
Pat. 367 235 (1990); Chem. Abstr. 114 (1991) 6485.
[22] Krauze A.A., Vitolina R.O., Romanova M.R., Dubur G.Y.,
Khim-Farm Zh. 19 (1985) 540–545.
[23] Teulon J.M., Schweisguth B., Cognacq J.C., Ger. Offen. 2 700 561
(1977); Chem. Abstr. 87 (1977) 152 205.
[24] Narushavicius E.V., Garalene V.N., Krauze A.A., Dubur G.Y.,
Khim-Farm. Zh. 23 (1989) 1459–1463.
[25] Hanfeld V., Wagner G., Leistner S., Lohman D., Poppe H., Heer S.,
Ger. (East) Offen. 271 112 (1989); Chem. Abstr. 112 (1990) 138 915.
[26] Hagen V., Rumler A., Reck G., Hagen A., Labes D., Heer S.,
Pharmazie 44 (1989) 809–813.
[27] Rumler A., Hagen V., Hagen A., Pharmazie 45 (1990) 657–659.
[28] Krauze A.A., Garalene V.N., Dubur G.Y., Khim-Farm Zh. 26 (1992)
40–43.
[29] Sugosawa S., Ito N., Japan Pat 70 16 217 (1970); Chem. Abstr. 73
(1970) 45 490.
[30] Sugosawa S., Ito N., Japan Pat 70 39 263 (1970); Chem. Abstr. 74
(1971) 87 836.