Encouraged by this result, we proceeded with the synthesis
of 2 by applying the reaction to commercially available (S)-
glycidol benzyl ether, ent-4 (Scheme 3). Screening of a range
Scheme 1
Scheme 3a
the Wadsworth-Emmons cyclopropanation, has rarely been
exploited in synthesis.3 Here we report successful imple-
mentation of this strategy, leading to enantioselective
synthesis of either C2-epimer of ent-2.
a Conditions: (a) triethyl phosphonoacetate, NaH, toluene, 110
°C, 14 h, 63%; (b) NaOH (aq), EtOH, 96%; (c) DPPA, BuOH,
NEt3, 53%; (d) Boc2O, MeCN, DMAP, 95%; (e) Pd/C, H2, cat.
AcOH, THF, 98%; (f) Bu4NI, DDQ, PPh3, CHCl3, rt.
t
At the outset of our studies, the degree of stereospecificity
of the Wadsworth-Emmons cyclopropanation reaction (and
hence its applicability to complex total synthesis of this type)
had not been determined, although optical rotation measure-
ments suggested that the transformation proceeds with some
degree of inversion at the epoxide stereocenter.3b,c We
addressed this issue by demonstrating that enantiomerically
pure (R)-styrene oxide 5 could be converted to the (S, S)-
trans-2-phenylcyclopropanecarboxylate 6 of >95% ee, thus
demonstrating essentially complete inversion of the epoxide
configuration. This is in accord with the proposed mechanism
(Scheme 2), which involves epoxide opening followed by
of solvents, bases, and temperatures (see Supporting Infor-
mation) revealed that the highest yields were obtained using
2 equiv of phosphonate and NaH in toluene at 110 °C,
providing the desired ent-3 in 63% yield and >95% ee
1
(analysis by H NMR in the presence of Eu(hfc)3 as chiral
shift reagent). NOE studies confirmed the trans relative
configuration of the cyclopropane. This reaction was per-
formed equally successfully on (R)-glycidol benzyl ether 4,
providing 3 (>95% ee), which possesses the same absolute
configuration as the natural product. With the aim of
preparation of novel material for biological testing, we
proceeded in the synthesis with the unnatural enantiomer ent-
3. Pleasingly, hydrolysis of ent-3 followed by Curtius
rearrangement of the derived azide and Boc-protection
afforded the cyclopropylamine 7. Removal of the benzyl
ether protecting group furnished (1′R,2′R)-(aminocyclopro-
pyl)methanol 8.
Scheme 2a
Exploratory work on the glycine enolate alkylation reaction
established a need for iodide 9 as the electrophile, since other
leaving groups (e.g., OMs, OTs) did not provide the
necessary reactivity. However, preparation of 9 from 8 using
several methods proved to be problematic due to the
instability of 9. Pleasingly, we were able to effect this
transformation cleanly and in high yield using Ph3P/DDQ/
Bu4NI,5 with 9 being used directly due to its sensitivity upon
chromatography and storage, as noted for its dideutero
analogue.2a We next studied the alkylation of iodide 9 with
the O’Donnell glycine equivalent 10 under phase-transfer
conditions, with a view to eventually using chiral catalysts.
We initially employed racemic 9 in order to ascertain the
level of any intrinsic 1,3-asymmetric induction in the
alkylation. However, attempts to perform the reaction under
liquid-liquid PTC conditions (50% aqueous KOH, toluene)
failed. Better results were obtained under solid-liquid-phase
transfer conditions (Bu4NBr catalyst). In CH2Cl2 as a solvent,
however, the inseparable protected (aminocyclopropyl)-
a Conditions: (a) triethyl phosphonoacetate, NaH, xylenes, 135
°C, 51%.
migration of the phosphonate group from carbon to oxygen
and subsequent SN2 ring closure. Recently, workers at
Bristol-Myers Squibb have reported similar cyclopropanation
of an aryl epoxide, confirming clean stereochemical inver-
sion.4
(3) (a) Wadsworth, W. S.; Emmons, W. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83,
1733-1738. (b) Tomoskozi, I. Tetrahedron 1966, 22, 179-182. (c) Izydore,
R. A.; Ghirardelli, R. D. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 1790-1793. (d)
Fitzsimmons, B. J.; Fraser-Reid, B. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 1279-1287. (e)
Clive, D. L. J.; Daigneault, S. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 332-
335. (f) Petter, R. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 399-402. (g) Petter, R.
C.; Banerjee, S.; Englard, S. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 3088-3097. (h) Jacks,
T. E.; Nibbe, H.; Wiemer, D. F. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 4584-4588. (i)
Robl, J. A.; Sieber-McMaster, E.; Sulsky, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
8985-8988. (j) Meul, T.; Kampfen, U. U.S. Pat. 5149869, 1992; Chem.
Abstr. 1992, 118, 38500. (k) Padmavathi, V.; Sharmila, K.; Reddy, A. S.;
Reddy, D. B. Ind. J. Chem. B. 2001, 40, 11-14.
(4) Singh, A. K.; Rao, M. N.; Simpson, J. H.; Li, W.; Thornton, J. E.;
Kuehner, D. E.; Kacsur, D. J. Org. Proc. Res. DeV. 2002, 6, 618-620.
(5) Iranpoor, N.; Firouzabadi, H.; Aghapour, Gh; Vaez zadeh, A. R.
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 8689-8693.
2332
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 13, 2003