EXTENDED ꢂ,n-PARTICIPATION IN SOLVOLYSIS
371
takes part in a similar manner regardless of whether the
second neighboring group is a double bond or a methoxy
group, i.e. under given conditions the methoxy group and
the double bond have comparable electron-donating
abilities. The results presented for 10 and 11 further
support the observation that in the transition state the
charge is more efficiently delocalized from the reaction
center if the double bond is located at C-5 than at C-4.
Hence the more reduced KIE with 10 than 5 and the more
reduced slope of the Hammett plot with 11 than 5
(Table 2) could be attributed to less charge on the reaction
center. Efficient charge delocalization could occur from
the optimal preorganized structure, which probably can-
not be achieved with 5 and 4 because of the angle strain.
Therefore, in the solvolysis of 10 and 11, the participation
of the second double bond is more important. The results
obtained could also be interpreted in terms of ‘early’ and
‘late’ transition states. The ‘earlier’ transition state exists
in the case of 4 and 5 and the ‘later’ state in the case of
10 and 11.
1.37 (m, 2H), 1.43–1.65 (m, 11H), 1.93–2.08 (m, 4H),
3.54–3.65 (m, 5H), 5.12–5.15 (t, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3),
ꢄ (ppm) 14.90, 16.20, 25.97, 34.12, 39.05, 41.15, 53.28,
68.50, 71.55, 122.44, 136.91.
1-Phenyl-8-methoxy-5-methyl-5-octenol. A suspension
of lithium powder (332 mg, 0.048 mol), granulated Li
(332 mg, 0.048 mol), dry THF (5 ml) and very little
(10 mL) CH3I was refluxed under a slow stream of argon
for 10–15 min in an ultrasonic bath, then a solution of
1.1 g (0.005 mol) of 1-bromo-4-methyl-7-methoxy-4-
heptene and benzaldehyde (0.575 g, 0.005 mol) in 20 ml
of dry THF was added dropwise to the stirred mixture at
0 ꢂC. After all the solution had been added, the reaction
mixture was by turns stirred with the magnetic stirrer and
the ultrasonic bath for 3 h. The progress of the reaction
was checked by TLC. The excess of Li was filtered off
and the filtrate was treated with a saturated aqueous
solution of NH4Cl. The alcohol was extracted with
diethyl ether and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The
diethyl ether was evaporated and the product was purified
on a silica gel column. Unreacted bromide was removed
with light petroleum and the pure alcohol was eluted with
dichloromethane. The yield of pure alcohol was 0.25 g
EXPERIMENTAL
1
Substrate preparation
(20.2%). H NMR (CDCl3) ꢄ (ppm) 1.38–1.52 (m, 5H),
1.89–1.99 (m, 4H), 2.46–2.50 (q, 2H), 3.26 (s, 3H), 3.54–
3.57 (t, 2H), 4.53–4.57 (t, 1H),5.10–5.13 (t, 1H), 7.17–
7.26 (m, 5H); 13C NMR (CDCl3), ꢄ (ppm) 17.08, 20.57,
26.16, 39.02, 39.29, 51.22, 67.49, 73.88, 123.99, 125.51,
127.84, 134.43, 135.17.
1-Bromo-4-methyl-7-methoxy-4-heptene. To a stirred
solution of primary alcohol (4-methyl-7-methoxy-4-
heptenol, 5 g, 0.032 mol) and carbon tetrabromide
(13.6 g, 0.041 mol) in 50 ml of dry methylene chloride,
a solution of triphenylphosphine (9.95 g, 0.038 mol) in
50 ml of the same solvent was added dropwise at room
temperature. After the addition was completed, the reac-
tion mixture was refluxed and stirred for 2–3 h. After
completion of the reaction (checked with TLC), light
petroleum was added and the volatiles were evaporated.
The crude product was purified by column chromatogra-
phy on silica gel by eluting the product with light
petroleum. The yield of pure bromide was 5.39 g
(76.5%). 1H NMR (CDCl3), ꢄ (ppm) 1.53 (s, 3H), 1.83–
2.08 (m, 6H), 3.28 (s, 3H), 3.59–3.65 (m, 4H), 5.12–5.15
(t, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3), ꢄ (ppm) 12.90, 30.44, 32.74,
34.37, 37.39, 51.16, 67.51, 125.39, 134.94.
1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-8-methoxy-5-methyl-5-octenol. The
procedure is the same as described above. From
221 mg, (32.00 mmol) of Li powder, 221 mg
(32.00 mmol) of granulated Li, 1.10 g (5.00 mmol) of 1-
bromo-7-methoxy-4-methyl-4-heptene
and
0.74 g
(5.00 mmol) of anisaldehyde was obtained 0.27 g
1
(19.4%) of pure alcohol. H NMR (CDCl3), ꢄ (ppm)
1.55–1.58 (m, 2H), 1.66–1.96 (m, 7H), 2.41–2.23
(q, 2H), 3.73–3.97 (m, 8H), 4.60–4.63 (t, 1H), 5.19–
5.21 (t, 1H), 7.12–7.14 (d, 2H), 7.21–7.23 (d, 2H); 13C
NMR (CDCl3), ꢄ (ppm) 16.00, 23.81, 26.33, 39.46,
39.72, 55.00, 59.00, 67.66, 76.47, 118.80, 123.49,
129.75, 143.38, 158.81.
2,6-Dimethyl-9-methoxy-6-nonen-2-ol. Grignard reagent,
prepared from Mg (1.35 g, 54.00 mmol) and 1-bromo-4-
methyl-7-methoxy-4-heptene (3 g, 14.00 mmol) in THF
(10 ml), was cooled to 0 ꢂC and a solution of acetone
(0.80 g, 14.00 mmol) in 10 ml of THF was added drop-
wise. Stirring was continued at room temperature for 1 h.
The Grignard complex was hydrolyzed with saturated
aqueous NH4Cl. The water layer was washed with diethyl
ether three times and the combined ether layers were
washed with brine and dried over Na2SO4. The crude
product was purified by column chromatography on silica
gel. The pure alcohol obtained (1.15 g, 41.1%) was in the
1-(4-Methylphenyl)-8-methoxy-5-methyl-5-octenol. The
procedure is the same as described above. From 221 mg
(32.00 mmol) of Li powder, 221 mg (32.00 mmol) of
granulated Li, 1.10 g (5.00 mmol) of 1-bromo-7-meth-
oxy-4-methyl-4-heptene and 0.65 g (5.00 mmol) of p-
toluylaldehyde was obtained 0.18 g (13.7%) of pure
1
alcohol. H NMR (CDCl3), ꢄ (ppm) 1.35–1.79 (m, 5H),
1.84–2.07 (m, 7H), 3.69–3.978 (m, 5H); 13C NMR
(CDCl3), ꢄ (ppm) 15.50, 20.73, 20.84, 25.36, 39.46,
53.33, 67.72, 74.00, 118.00, 124.00, 124.26, 134.46,
136.63, 141.91.
1
form of a viscous oil. H NMR (CDCl3), ꢄ (ppm) 1.33–
Copyright # 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2005; 18: 368–372