W. Zhong et al. / Catalysis Communications 56 (2014) 148–152
149
block-poly(propyleneglycol)-block-poly(ethyleneglycol), average mo-
lecular weight = 5800, Aldrich] was dissolved in 90 ml deionized
water at ambient temperature under violent stirring. Subsequently,
beads. The weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) of cyclohexylamine
was 43.2 h . The oxidation was performed by air at atmospheric
−
1
pressure and at a temperature of 190 °C. The flow rate of gases was
−
1
3
−1
6
0 ml of 4 mol l HCl (CR, Sinophar) was introduced with continuous
70 cm min . The reactant was fed into the reactor using a syringe in-
fusion pump. The products, collected in the receiver flask, were ana-
lyzed in a gas chromatograph (Agilent 6890N) equipped with a DB-5
capillary column (30 m) and a flame ionization detector using naphtha-
lene as an internal standard. The components of the gas phase were an-
alyzed by gas chromatography with a TCD detector. The products were
identified by GC–MS (SHIMADZU, QP2010 PLUS) and by comparison
with commercially pure products. The conversion of cyclohexylamine
and selectivity of cyclohexanone oxime were calculated using the
following formulas (Eqs. (1) and (2)). All raw materials and products
were established carbon mass balances.
stirring. 9.8 ml of tetraethyl orthosilicate (CR, Damao) was added
dropwise into the former solution at 40 °C. After being stirred continu-
ously for 24 h, the mixture was transferred to a Teflon-lined stainless
steel autoclave and placed in an oven at 100 °C (aging temperature)
for 24 h. The precipitate was in turn filtered, washed with deionized
water, and dried at 80 °C overnight. The obtained powders were finally
heated up to 550 °C at a ramp rate of 1 °C/min and calcined at this tem-
perature in air for 8 h. To investigate the effect of the structural proper-
ties on the catalytic performance, the preparation was conducted with
different aging temperatures (60, 80, 100, 110, 120 and 140 °C) and
the addition of a swelling agent (trimethylbenzene) according to [20],
which allow one to change the pore diameter and pore volume. For
comparison, the other mesoporous silicas MCM-41, SBA-3 and HMS
were also prepared according to [21–23], respectively. Grance gel was
supplied by Aldrich.
Conversion of cyclohexylamine ð%Þ
the amount ðmolÞ of starting cyclohexylamineꢀ
½the amount ðmolÞ of cyclohexylamine recoveredꢀ
ð1Þ
½
−
¼
ꢁ100%
½
the amount ðmolÞ of starting cyclohexylamineꢀ
2
.2. Catalyst characterization
Selectivity of cyclohexanone oximeð%Þ
¼
½
½
the amount ðmolÞ of cyclohexanone oximeꢀ
the amount ðmolÞ of starting cyclohexylamineꢀ
The nitrogen adsorption–desorption measurements were carried
ꢁ 100% ð2Þ
out at −196 °C on a Tristar 3000 sorptometer. Themogravimetric
analyses (TGA) were performed with TA Instruments equipment
from 50 to 800 °C operating at 10 °C/min under airflow. Solid-state
−½the amount ðmol of cyclohexylamine recoveredÞꢀ
2
9
Si MAS NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Infinitypuls at a
Larmor frequency of 121.35 MHz. The chemical shifts for the 29Si res-
onance were referred to tetramethylsilane. All solid-state NMR
experiments were carried out with a spinning rate of 8 kHz and
silanol concentrations were calculated by dividing the molar fraction
of the respective silicon species by the molar weight of the sample
3. Result and discussion
3.1. Catalytic performance of various silica catalysts
Catalytic performances of various silica materials are summarized in
Table 1. As expected, the blank experiment without any catalyst gives
no cyclohexylamine conversion as a result of the catalytic oxidation re-
action. High activity is obtained over SBA-15 to yield a conversion of
11.2% (with 96.6% cyclohexanone oxime selectivity), which is remark-
ably higher than those on the other silica catalysts. When silica gel is ap-
plied to the reaction, the selectivity for the oxidation is as low as 61.3%,
which is the lower compared with the other mesoporous silica catalysts
(N93%). This great difference between the catalytic activities of SBA-15
and the other silica catalysts is very interesting considering that the var-
ious walls of mesoporous silica and silica gel are all made of amorphous
silica. What is the cause of this great difference? First, we compare the
specific surface area, pore volume size and pore size distribution of var-
(
determined as sum of molar weights and fractions of the different
silicon species). Fourier transformation infrared (FT-IR) spectra
were obtained on an AVATAR 370 Thermo Nicolet spectrophotome-
ter with a resolution of 4 cm . Samples were dehydrated at
2
1
were performed using a Carlo Erba CE Instruments EA 1110.
In order to determine the nature of the carbon species, ca. 15 mg of
the spent SBA-15 was dissolved in 1 cm of a concentrated HF aqueous
−
1
00 °C for 6 h under nitrogen and ground with KBr in the ratio
:150 and pressed into thin wafers. Elemental analyses (C, H, N)
3
3
solution (40%, Sinophar) at room temperature. Subsequently, 4 cm of
CH
its separation from the aqueous phase, was analyzed by HPLC–MS
Agilent 1260/6120).
2 2
Cl was added to extract the soluble carbon material which, after
(
2
ious silica catalysts obtained by using N -physisorption. As shown in
Table 1, the commercial silica gel with the lower specific surface area
has higher catalytic activity than those of mesoporous silica (MCM-41,
HMS, SBA-3). This indicates that the specific surface area is not the
most important factor which determines the oxidation activity of silica.
On the other hand, both SBA-15 and silica gel have relatively high pore
volume with a wide pore size distribution centered above 6 nm and the
higher conversions are achieved, indicating that pore volume size is
more responsible for the formation of oxime. Next, we studied the de-
pendence of catalytic activity on the pore size of the SBA-15 samples,
as shown in Fig. 1. Surprisingly, catalytic activity is strongly dependent
on the pore diameter of the catalyst and is maximized at around
6.1 nm. Smaller or larger pores are not suitable for the catalytic oxida-
tion of cyclohexylamine, which can not be only associated that the
shape selective catalysis may be involved in this process. In the present
reaction, the diameter of cyclohexylamine is 0.79 nm (the distance be-
tween hydrogen and the most distant hydrogen is 0.59 nm; the van
der Waals radius of hydrogen is 0.10 nm) and that of the product should
be 0.86 nm, while the most appropriate pore diameter for the catalyst is
approximately 6.1 nm. The phenomenon may be accounted for by struc-
tural characteristics of SBA-15. First, some synergistic effect may be in-
volved at larger pores, but for pores less than 4 nm in size, diffusion
2
.3. Catalyst testing
The vapor phase oxidation of cyclohexylamine was carried out in a
fixed bed vertical downward flow glass reactor of internal diameter
cm. About 1.2 g of a catalyst was placed at the center of the reactor
2
supported on either side with a thin layer of quartz wool and ceramic
Table 1
a
Physicochemical properties and catalytic performances of various silicas.
Db
S
b
V
b
Conversion
(%)
Selectivity
(%)
Sample
BET
p
2
3
(
nm)
(m /g)
(cm /g)
Silica gel
SBA-15
MCM-41
SBA-3
HMS
Null
9.25
6.13
3.32
2.86
3.01
–
314
783
736
594
785
–
0.86
1.33
0.69
0.33
0.45
–
3.7
11.2
1.6
0.15
0.24
–
61.3
96.6
93.4
98.1
96.4
–
a
Reaction conditions: space velocity 43.2 h−1; air, 70 cm−3/min; temperature, 190 °C;
time, 11 h.
b
p
D: pore size; SBET: surface area calculated by BET method; V : pore volume.