W. Ren et al.
Dyes and Pigments 191 (2021) 109366
water, and further purified by column chromatography eluent with
CH
2 2
Cl : MeOH (25:1, v/v). Finally, the orange solid was obtained as the
1
final product, DMQ (0.19 g, yield 65%). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
3
) δ
.11 (dd, J = 9.0, 14.1 Hz, 4H), 8.01 (d, J = 16.6 Hz, 2H), 7.80 (dd, J =
.8, 15.7 Hz, 4H), 7.73–7.68 (m, 2H), 7.53–7.48 (m, 4H), 7.32 (s, 2H),
.97 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl
8
8
3
1
1
3
) δ 156.61, 151.99, 148.18,
36.42, 129.88, 129.79, 129.10, 128.92, 127.61, 127.41, 126.79,
26.30, 118.81, 109.37, 77.42, 77.11, 76.79, 56.31. HR-MS (m/z, ESI)
Calculated for C30
H
24
2
N O
2
[M+H] m/z = 445.1911. Found m/z =
4
45.1902.
Quantum yield measure. The fluorescence quantum yields (Φ) of
DMQ in different solvents were determined by using fluorescein (0.1 M
NaOH, Φ = 0.95) as the standard reference, according to the literature
method [28]. The quantum yields were corrected as follows:
Scheme 1. The chemical structure of DMQ and its properties.
LDs with mitochondria and ER under the condition of starvation.
A
A
r
s
D
D
s
Φ
s
= Φ
r
r
where the s and r indices refer to designate the sample and reference,
respectively, A is the absorbance at λ ex, and D is the integrated area
under the spectrum.
2
. Experimental section
Cell culture and MTT assay. All cells were cultured in culture flasks
Regents and instruments. Glycerol trioleate (TG), glyceryl dioleate
in DMEM (high glucose) supplemented with fetal bovine serum (10%),
(
DG), cholesterol (CE), cholesteryl ester (CH), oleic acid (OA), p-dia-
◦
penicillin (100 U/mL) and streptomycin (50 U/mL) at 37 C in a CO
2
nisole, para-formaldehyde, formaldehyde solution, triphenylphosphine
and so on were purchased from Sigma. 3-(4,5-dimethythiazol-2-yl)-2,5-
diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT), BODIPY 493/503, ER-tracker Red
and Mito-tracker DeepRed were purchased from Thermofisher. Other
chemical reagents were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent
Co., Ltd. Water was doubly distilled and purified via a Milli-Q water
system (Millipore, USA). NMR spectra in solution were performed on
Bruker 400 MHz Ultrashield Spectrometer. High-resolution mass spectra
2
incubator (95% relative humidity, 5% CO ). Cells were seeded into 20
mm glass-bottomed dishes, and cultured for 24 h for fluorescent
imaging.
The cytotoxicities of DMQ was studied by MTT assay. Hep G2 and
5
HeLa cells (10 cell/mL, 10 mL) were dispersed with 96-well microtiter
◦
plates to a total volume of 100
in 5% CO
μ
L/well. Plates were maintained at 37 C
2
/95% air incubator for 24 h. The cells were incubated for 18 h
with different concentrations of DMQ (1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10
μ
M) in the
(
HR-MS) were obtained by using an LTQ Orbitrap XL hybrid FTMS by
◦
medium at 37 C. Then, 10
μ
L MTT (5 mg/mL) solution was added into
Thermo Fisher Scientific. UV–visible absorption spectra were measured
with a HITACHI UH5300 spectrometer. Fluorescent spectra were
recorded on HITACHI F-7000 fluorescence spectrophotometer. Fluo-
rescent images were acquired on laser confocal microscope (Leica TCS
SP8X), and 50% of laser power was applied.
each well and incubated for additional 4 h. After removal of supernatant
and addition of 100 L of DMSO into each well, the cells were shaken for
0 min, and the absorbance in each well was measured at 492 nm use of
μ
1
a microplate reader (Biotek, USA). The cell viability (%) was calculated
according to the equation: cell viability % = A/B × 100%, where A
represents the absorbance of each well treated with DMQ, and B rep-
resents that of the control wells.
Synthesis of compound DMQ. The compound a and b were synthe-
sized according to the reported method [26,27].
Synthesis of compound a. The p-dianisole (5.55 g, 40.2 mmol) and
para-formaldehyde (1.52 g) were added into a 500 mL round bottom
flask, followed by adding aqueous formaldehyde solution (30%, 12.5
mL), concentrated hydrochloric acid (140 mL) and 1,4-dioxane (32.0
mL). After refluxing for 6 h, the mixture was cooled and filtered to
obtain the white precipitation as the crude product. The obtained
3
. Results and discussion
′
Firstly, we designed a highly hydrophobic probe, 2,2’-((1E,1 E)-(2,5-
dimethoxy-1,4-phenylene)bis(ethene-2,1-diyl))diquinoline (DMQ). The
synthetic route was shown in Scheme 2, and the structure of the target
powder was dissolved into CH
2 2
Cl , and then MeOH (600 mL) was added,
probe DMQ with a large
π
-conjugation was fully confirmed by HR-MS,
H and C NMR (Fig. S1-S3). In the structure of DMQ, there was no
strong hydrophilic moiety such as hydroxyl and amino groups (Scheme
). We further measured the oil-water separation coefficient (log P) of
the white precipitation which was collected by filtration and air dried to
1
13
1
afford compound a (7.18 g, yield 76%). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
.93 (s, 2H), 4.64 (s, 4H), 3.86 (s, 6H). HR-MS (m/z, ESI) Calculated for
12Cl
[M+H] m/z = 235.0287. Found m/z = 235.0276.
Synthesis of compound b. Compound a (2.6 g, 11.1 mmol), triphe-
3
) δ
6
1
C
10
H
2 2
O
DMQ as 3.034 (Fig. S4), suggesting our probe DMQ with high hydro-
phobicity. Then, the optical properties of DMQ in different solvents were
tested (Fig. 1). In the absorption spectra, DMQ in PBS buffer (pH 7.2)
showed a red-shifted peak and a broader band (Fig. 1a), likely because of
the aggregation formation of DMQ in aqueous solution (Fig. S9).
Meanwhile, DMQ had obvious fluorescence in different organic solvents
but no emission in PBS buffer (Fig. 1b and Table 1), indicating that the
aggregation of DMQ caused fluorescence quenching as a consequence of
the formation of an exciplex (Fig. S9) [29,30]. Notably, DMQ had strong
emission in TG, the major component of LDs core (Fig. 2a), which was
the basis of label intracellular LDs. To ensure the low noise in the next
imaging experiments, we further examined the DMQ fluorescent spectra
in liposomes, similar to the membrane structures in live cells. The results
indicated that no fluorescent signal was detected, which was like in PBS
buffer. These results imply that our probe DMQ is a candidate for label
LDs with high signal/noise ratio.
nylphosphine (8.8 g, 33.4 mmol) and methanol (70 mL) were added into
a 250 mL round bottom flask, and then the mixture was refluxed for 8 h.
After cooling down and removing the solvent in vacuum, a yellow oil
was obtained. Toluene (200 mL) was added to the foregoing mixture and
the generated white precipitation was filtered as the compound b (6.1 g,
1
yield 72%). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
3
) δ 7.79–7.61 (m, 30H), 6.92 (s,
2
H), 5.25 (d, J = 12.9 Hz, 4H), 2.96 (s, 6H). HR-MS (m/z, ESI) Calcu-
2
+
lated for C46
H
42
O
2
P
2
[M] m/z = 344.1325. Found m/z = 344.1318.
Synthesis of compound DMQ. Firstly, Na (0.12 g, 5.22 mmol) was
added to EtOH (14 mL) and stirred thoroughly until it was completely
dissolved to obtain a solution of sodium ethoxide. Quinoline-2-
formaldehyde (0.23 g, 1.46 mmol) and compound b (0.50 g, 0.66
mmol) were added into the above ethanolic solution of sodium ethoxide.
After refluxed for 4 h, the solvent was removed by rotary distillation
under vacuum. The solid was sequentially washed with n-hexane and
2