B. Sathiamoorthy et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 239–242
Table 2. Antimicrobial activity of extract, fractions, and isolated compounds
241
Extract/fraction/pure compound
Minimum inhibitory concn (MIC) in lg/ml against
Fungi
Bacteria
3
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Ethanolic extract
n-Hexane fraction
125
>500
250
250
>50
25
250
—
250
500
500
250
50
500
>500
>500
500
50
250
>500
>500
125
25
>500
>500
>500
>500
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
0.5
62.5
125
>500
62.5
12.5
25
>500
>500
>500
>500
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
2.0
125
>500
>500
250
25
>500
>500
>500
>500
50
>500
>500
>500
>500
25
Chloroform fraction
n-Butanol fraction
1*
2*
3*
4*
5*
6*
500
250
25
25
50
50
25
25
50
>50
>50
>50
50
25
>50
>50
>50
25
>50
>50
25
>50
>50
25
>50
>50
50
12.5
6.25
6.25
25
12.5
6.25
6.25
12.5
2.0
>50
>50
>50
>50
1.0
>50
25
25
25
>50
ND
50.0
25
50
2.0
Flu
Amp
ND
0.02
ND
0.09
ND
0.02
ND
0.09
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1, Streptococcus faecalis; 2, Klebsiella pneumoniae; 3, Escherichia coli; 4, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; 5, Staphylococcus aureus; 6, Candida albicans; 7,
Cryptococcus neoformans; 8, Sporothrix schenckii; 9, Trichophyton mentagrophytes; 10, Aspergillus fumigatus; 11, Candida parapsilosis (ATCC-22019)
Flu, fluconazole; Amp, ampicillin; ND, not done; , pure compound.
*
of glucose indicated presence of carbonyl group at this
position. This observation was well supported with pres-
ence of carbonyl carbon at dC 170.0 in 13C NMR spec-
trum. The HMBC spectrum was utilized to identify
position of sugar, a long range correlation (Table 1) be-
tween H-100/C-30 confirmed the attachment of sugar at
C-30, other useful correlation between H-500/C-600,
-OCH3/C-600, H-20/C-30,40, and H-50/C-10,30 confirmed
the position of methoxyl and carbonyl group. Further
acid hydrolysis of 4 followed by co-TLC with authentic
samples glycone (methyl ester of glucuronic acid) and
aglycone (luteolin) was confirmed.26 Further D-configu-
In conclusion, we have isolated five known compounds
1–3, 5 and 6 and a new flavonoid glycoside 4 from V.
negundo through activity guided fractionation and dis-
covered the potent antifungal activity of isolated com-
pounds. The compounds 4 and 5 were found to be
most active at MIC 6.25 lg/ml among all the isolated
compounds. The further chemical transformation of
compounds 4 and 5 is under progress to improve their
biological profile.
Acknowledgments
ration of glycone was confirmed with optical rotation of
30
D
acetate derivative ½aꢁ +11.4ꢁ (CHCl3) with those
Authors are thankful to ICMR, New Delhi, for financial
assistance. We also thank Dr. Ashish Arora for the
HMBC spectral data and S. C. Tiwari for technical
assistance.
reported in the literature.27 Thus based on the foregoing
evidence, the structure of compound 4 was elucidated as
40, 5, 7-trihydroxy-30-O-b-D-glucuronic acid-600-methyl
ester, a new naturally occurring compound named vite-
gnoside. Other five known compounds, 50-hydroxy-30,
40, 3, 6, 7-pentamethoxyflavone (1)28, luteolin (2)24,
agnuside (3)17, negundoside (5)17,18, and iso-orientin
(6)29, were characterized by comparing their spectro-
scopic data with those reported in the literature.
References and notes
1. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Statement of the
IDSA concerning ‘Bioshield II: Responding to an ever-
changing threat’. Alexandria, VA: IDSA; 2004.
2. Adcock, H. Pharm. J. 2002, 269, 599.
All the isolated compounds 1–6 were evaluated for
antifungal activity (Table 2). The compounds 4 and
5 showed promising activity against T. mentagrophytes
and C. neoformans of MIC 6.25 lg/ml as compared to
standard antifungal drug fluconazole, having MIC of
2 lg/ml against T. mentagrophytes. Compounds 1
and 3 showed activity of MIC 12.5 lg/ml against C.
neoformans, whereas compounds 3 and 6 showed
activity against T. mentagrophytes. at similar concen-
3. Chopra, I.; Hodgson, J.; Metcalf, B.; Poste, G. J. Am.
Med. Assoc. 1996, 275, 401.
4. Cushnie, T. P. T.; Lamb, A. J. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents
2005, 26, 343.
5. Kirtikar, K. R.; Basu, B. D. Ind. Med. plants 1935, 3.
6. The wealth of India: Raw materials Publication &
Information Directorate, CSIR, New Delhi, 1976; Vol.
X, pp 520.
7. Dharmasiri, M. G.; Jayakody, J. R. D. C.; Galhena, G.;
Liyanage, S. S. P.; Ratnasooriya, W. D. J. Ethanophar-
macol. 2003, 87, 199.
8. Zheng, G. M.; Luo, Z. M.; Chen, D. M. Guangdong
Gongye Dexue Xuebao 1999, 16, 41.
9. Chawla, A. S.; Sharma, A. K.; Handa, S. S.; Dhar, K. L.
Indian J. Chem., Sect. B 1991, 30B, 773.
10. Balbao, J. G.;Lim-Sylianco, C. Y.Phillip. J. Sci. 1993, 122, 1.
11. Bhargava, S. K. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1989, 27, 327.
12. Gupta, M.; Mazumder, U. K.; Bhawal, S. R. Indian J.
Exp. Biol. 1999, 37, 143.
tration. Compound
2
showed moderate activity
(25 lg/ml) against each test organism. The minimum
inhibitory concentration (MIC) of standard drug
fluconazole and test compounds was determined
against test isolates by broth micro-dilution technique
as per guidelines of NCCLS using 96-well tissue cul-
ture plates using RPMI 1640 media buffered with
MOPS (3-[N-Morpholino] propanesulfonic acid) (Sig-
ma Chemical Co.).30–33