SANAPUREDDY AND PLASSERAUD
7 of 8
−
1
the balance flow rate was 40 ml min . Weight loss percent-
ages and onset temperatures were determined using the TA
Universal Analysis 2000 software dedicated to the instru-
ment. Elemental analyses and ICP‐AES measurements were
performed at the Plateforme d'Analyse Chimique et de
Synthèse Moléculaire de l'Université de Bourgogne
Scientific FOCUS GC, TR‐Wax 30 m capillary column,
FID detector). The tin‐based residue was characterized using
IR spectroscopy and elemental analyses.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
(
PACSMUB) with a Fisons EA 1108 CHNS‐O apparatus
We gratefully acknowledge the Institut de Chimie of the
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS‐INC,
France) and the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR,
France, grant ANR‐08‐CP2D‐18) for support of this work
and a postdoctoral grant to S.R.S. We thank also Mr Marcel
Soustelle, Dr Myriam Heydel and Dr Lucie Chupin for
elemental analyses, ICP‐AES measurements and improve-
ment of the manuscript, respectively. We are also grateful to
the anonymous reviewers for their helpful and relevant
comments which have significantly contributed to enhance
the content of this paper.
and a Thermo Scientific iCAP 7400 Series analyser,
respectively.
4
.2 | Preparation of 1
A methanolic solution of di‐n‐butyltin dichloride (3.09 g,
.01 mol, 15 ml of CH OH) was mixed slowly with 15 ml
0
3
of an aqueous solution of sodium carbonate (1.06 g,
.01 mol). The white solid, which precipitated immediately,
0
was then transferred to a 125 ml stainless steel reactor and
the mixture was heated under CO atmosphere at 150 °C
2
for 24 h (Ptotal = 60 bar). After the reaction, the excess CO2
was removed slowly and the resultant solid was filtered and
washed several times with deionized water, then dried under
vacuum at 100 °C for 3 h. The dry material was finally stored
under argon atmosphere for future use.
REFERENCES
[
1] Non‐exhaustive list of review articles published since 2012: a) I.
Omae, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2012, 256, 1384. b) M. Holscher, C.
Gurtler, W. Keim, T. E. Muller, M. Peters, W. Leitner, Z.
Naturforsch. 2012, 67b, 961. c) M. Aresta, A. Dibenedetto, A.
Angelini, J. CO2 Util. 2013, 3–4, 65. d) M. Aresta, A. Dibenedetto,
A. Angelini, Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 1709. e) A. Dibenedetto, A.
Angelini, P. Stufano, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2014, 89,
1
3
H NMR (CD OD, 300 K, δ, ppm): 0.96 (t, JH–
3
1
3
1
=
6.7 Hz, 12H), 1.49 (m, 16H), 1.71 (m, 8H). C{ H}
H
NMR (CD OD, 300 K, δ, ppm): 14.02, 14.07, 24.03
3
1
(
JCSn = 600 Hz), 28.09, 28.29, 28.49, 28.58, 28.72,
3
34. f) G. Fiorani, W. Guo, A. W. Kleij, Green Chem. 2015, 17,
1
19
1
1
−
1
60.12.
173.5, −205.8. IR (cm ): 2956, 2924, 2871, 2857, 1507,
464, 1371, 1287, 1156, 1078, 869, 826, 675, 617. Anal.
Calcd for C H O Sn (541.88) (%): C, 37.68; H, 6.70.
Sn{ H} NMR (CD OD, 300 K, δ, ppm):
3
1375. g) A. Otto, T. Grube, S. Schiebahn, D. Stolten, Energy Envi-
ron. Sci. 2015, 8, 3283. h) S. Das, F. D. Felix, A. Gopakumar, P. J.
Dyson, Chimia 2015, 69, 765. i) Q. Liu, L. Wu, R. Jackstell, M.
Beller, Nature Commun. 2015, 6, 5933. j) H. Wang, P. Gao, T.
Zhao, W. Wei, Y. Sun, Sci. China Chem. 2015, 58, 79.
−1
17
36
4
2
Found (%): C, 37.69; H, 7.02.
[
[
2] Examples of events in 2016: ICCDU XIV – International Confer-
ence on carbon dioxide utilisation, Sheffield; 7th carbon dioxide
utilisation summit, Lyon; 5th Conference on carbon dioxide as
feedstock for fuels, chemistry and polymers, cologne; Closing the
carbon cycle: Fuels from air, Phoenix.
4
.3 | High‐pressure organic carbonate
synthesis
4
.3.1 | Safety warning
3] a) B. Schaffner, F. Schaffner, S. P. Verevkin, A. Borner, Chem. Rev.
2
010, 110, 4554. b) S. Huang, B. Yan, S. Wang, X. Ma, Chem. Soc.
Rev. 2015, 44, 3079.
[4] C. Martín, G. Fiorani, A. W. Kleij, ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 1353.
Experiments involving pressurized gases can be hazardous
and must only be conducted with suitable equipment and
following appropriate safety considerations.
[21]
[
5] a) J. Kizlink, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1993, 58, 1399. b) J.
Kizlink, I. Pastucha, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1995, 60,
The reaction was carried out in a 125 ml stainless steel
reactor equipped with a magnetic stirrer. The reactor was
purged with argon and a 20 ml suspension of 1 in the required
alcohols (methanol, ethanol, n‐butanol or isopropanol) was
6
87.
[
6] a) D. Ballivet‐Tkatchenko, O. Douteau, S. Stutzmann, Organome-
tallics 2000, 19, 4563. b) M. Aresta, A. Dibenedetto, C. Pastore,
Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 3256. c) K. Kohno, J.‐C. Choi, Y. Ohshima,
A. Yili, H. Yasuda, T. Sakakura, J. Organomet. Chem. 2008, 693,
introduced by syringe. Then, CO was admitted to the desired
2
amount (32 g). The reaction temperature was controlled by an
internal thermocouple. After a reaction time of 24 h, the reac-
tor was cooled to 0 °C, the pressure was gently released and
the liquid phase was transferred to a Schlenk tube. Trap‐to‐
trap distillation under vacuum at ambient temperature
allowed separation of volatile compounds that were quantita-
tively analysed using GC (DEC external standard, Thermo
1
389. d) Y. Masui, S. Haga, M. Onaka, Chem. Lett. 2011, 40,
1
408. e) S. Petr, R. Olejník, Z. Padelkova, A. Ruzicka, L.
Plasseraud, J. Organomet. Chem. 2012, 707–708, 82.
[
7] a) B. Fan, H. Li, W. Fan, Z. Qin, R. Li, Pure Appl. Chem. 2011, 84,
663. b) D. Ballivet‐Tkatchenko, F. Bernard, F. Demoisson, L.
Plasseraud, S. Reddy Sanapureddy, ChemSusChem 2011, 4,