the sp2-sp2 rotation in these biaryl ligands causes only small
energy change within a wide range of dihedral angle. We
screen the reaction conditions. The anionic dinuclear ruthe-
nium (II) complexes of [NH Me ][{RuCl((S)-Cn-TunaPhos)}
(µ-Cl) ] (n ) 1-6) were prepared according to the literature
method and used as the catalysts. The reactions were carried
out in ethanol at room temperature under 3 atm of hydrogen
pressure with a substrate/Ru ratio of 100:1. As shown in
Table 1, the Ru-TunaPhos catalysts are generally active and
2
2
2
-
have recently developed a novel class of diphosphine ligands
3
6
11
(
Cn-TunaPhos, n ) 1-6) (Figure 1) with tunable dihedral
Table 1. Ligand Screening for Ru-Catalyzed Hydrogenation of
Enol Acetate
Figure 1. Cn-TunaPhos, n ) 1-6.
angles by introducing a bridge with variable length to link
the chiral atropisomeric biaryl groups. Thus, the sp2-sp2
rotation in these biaryl ligands is restricted. The interesting
point is that each of the ligands adopts a small change of
dihedral angle of the chiral backbone. These ligands allow
us to systematically study the influence of dihedral angle of
atropisomeric biaryl diphosphines on the reactivity and
selectivity of asymmetric reactions. As a result, excellent
ligands with high reactivity and enantioselectivity for
particular substrates could be found. We have previously
demonstrated that TunaPhos are excellent ligands for some
asymmetric reactions.6 For example, in Ru-catalyzed asym-
metric hydrogenation of â-keto esters, C4-TunaPhos has
shown the best enantioselectivity (up to 99% ee) among the
TunaPhos ligands. To further expand the applications of the
TunaPhos ligands in asymmetric catalysis, we herein report
our recent studies on asymmetric hydrogenation of enol
acetates catalyzed by Ru-TunaPhos complexes.
entrya
ligand
dihedral angleb (deg)
eec (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
60
74
77
88
94
95.9
95.9
92.1
88.9
91.9
92.3
106
a
[
NH2Me2][{RuCl[(S)-Cn-TunaPhos]}2(µ-Cl)3] were used as catalysts;
substrate/Ru ) 100:1; all reactions were complete in >99% conversion.
Calculated dihedral angles of Cn-TunaPhos from CAChe MM2 program.
Enantiomeric excesses were determined by chiral GC using a Supelco
b
c
6
chiral select 1000 (0.25 mm × 30 m) column; the configuration of the
,7
product is S.
the reactions were complete in all cases. The obtained
enantioselectivities are particularly interesting. C1- and C2-
TunaPhos possessing smaller dihedral angles gaVe high
enantiomeric excesses (both 95.9%). The enantioselectivity
dropped to 92.1% ee with C3-TunaPhos and reached the
lowest (88.9% ee) with C4-TunaPhos. Further increase of
the dihedral angles led to the increase of enantioselectivities
to 91.6% ee with C5-TunaPhos and 92.3% ee with C6-
TunaPhos. This trend is in contrast to our previous observa-
tions on hydrogenation of â-ketoesters, where C4-TunaPhos
Asymmetric hydrogenation of readily accessible enol
acetates is an attractive alternative to direct hydrogenation
of unfunctionalized ketones. An advantage of enol acetate
substrates is their chelation through secondary donor
group.This chelation is important to achieve high enantiose-
lectivity in hydrogenation. Good to excellent enantioselec-
tivites have been achieved upon asymmetric hydrogenation
of some cyclic and acyclic enol esters with Rh-phosphine
6
showed the best ee. Although it is still unclear why the
TunaPhos ligands provide different trends of ees in the two
types of reactions, the phenomenon indicates that different
reactions may require diphosphines with different dihedral
angles. These results, on the other hand, also reflect the
important design of our TunaPhos ligands.
Further experiments with C1 and C2-TunaPhos ligands
revealed a strong solvent effect in hydrogenation of 1-(2-
naphthyl)-1-(acetyloxy)ethylene (Table 2). The best ee
(97.7%) was achieved when a mixture of ethanol/CH
4:1) was used as the solvent and the Ru-C2-TunaPhos
complex was employed as the catalyst (entry 2). This result
is higher than those obtained with the Rh-PennPhos system
8
complexes. In contrast, hydrogenation of enol acetates
employing Ru-chiral phosphine system is rarely mentioned
9
in the literature. We initiated this study by choosing 1-(2-
naphthyl)-1-(acetyloxy)ethylene10 as the model substrate to
(
6) Zhang, Z.; Qian, H.; Longmire, J.; Zhang, X. J. Org. Chem. 2000,
6
4
5, 6223.
(
1, 3457.
7) Lei, A.; He, M.; Wu, S.; Zhang, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002,
2 2
Cl
(
(
8) For selected examples of asymmetric hydrogenations of simple enol
acetates, see: (a) Li, W.; Zhang, Z.; Xiao, D.; Zhang, X. J. Org. Chem.
000, 65, 3489. (b) Jiang, Q.; Xiao, D.; Zhang, Z.; Cao, P.; Zhang, X.
2
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 516 and the references cited. (c) Boaz,
N. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5505. (d) Burk, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1
991, 113, 8518. (e) Koenig, K. E.; Bachman, G. L.; Vineyard, B. D. J.
Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 2362.
9) For asymmetric hydrogenation of 1-phenyl-1-(acetyloxy)ethylene with
(10) For the synthesis of enol acetates, see: Larock, R. C. ComprehensiVe
Organic Transformations; VCH: New York, 1989; p 743.
(11) (a) Mashima, K.; Nakanura, T.; Matsuo, Y.; Tani, K. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2000, 607, 51. (b) Ohta, T.; Tonomura, Y.; Nazaki, K.; Takaya, H.;
Mashima, K. Organometallics 1996, 19, 1521. (c) Ikariya, T.; Ishii, Y.;
Kawano, H.; Arai, T.; Saburi, M.; Yoshikawa, S.; Akutagawa, S. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985, 922.
(
Ru-BINAP complex, see: Ohta, T.; Miyake, T.; Seido, N.; Kumobayashi,
H.; Takaya, H. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 357. For asymmetric hydrogenation
of 1,1,1-trifluoroalkan-2-one enol acetates, see: Kuroki, Y.; Asada, D.;
Sakamaki, Y.; Iseki, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 4603.
4496
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 25, 2002