Article
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 49, No. 12, 2010 5621
50 kV and 30 mA. The structures were solved by direct methods
and expanded routinely. The models were refined by full-matrix
least-squares analysis of F2 against all reflections. All non-
hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic thermal dis-
placement parameters. Thermal parameters for the hydrogen
atoms were tied to the isotropic thermal parameter of the
atom to which they are bonded. Programs used were APEX-II
v2.1.4,20 SHELXTL v6.14,21 and Diamond v3.1e.22 Crystal-
lographic data collection and refinement parameters are listed in
Table 1.
Catalytic Studies. In a typical reaction, 0.05 g (25 μmol) of
SLUG-9 was placed in a 100 mL round-bottom flask along with
15.0 mL (168 mmol) of 2-butanone (methylethyl ketone, MEK,
Acros 99þ %, extra pure) and 9.35 mL (168 mmol) of ethylene
glycol (Acros, 99þ %). Other carbonyl substrates used were
acetone (Fisher, ACS reagent grade, 99.7%), benzaldehyde
(Aldrich,g99%), 2-pentanone (TCI America, min. 97%), and
acetaldehyde (Acros, 99%). This mixture was refluxed under
Dean-Stark conditions to remove water product. After a speci-
fied amount of reflux time, the reaction mixture was allowed to
cool to room temperature, and the catalyst was removed by
suction filtration. PXRD patterns of the solid were collected as
well as NMR spectra of the filtrate to determine the robustness
of the catalyst and percent yield of the reaction, respectively. 1H
NMR peaks used to calculate the percent yields were those of
ethylene glycol (δ 3.726, d or t, 4H) and the corresponding peaks
in the product: 2-ethyl-2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane (δ 3.88-3.97,
m, 4H), 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolane (δ 3.912, s, 4H), 2-methyl-
1,3-dioxolane (δ 3.83-3.92, m, 4H), 2-phenyl-1,3-dioxolane
(δ 4.00-4.20, m, 4H) and 2-methyl-2-propyl-1,3-dioxolane
(δ 3.89-3.98, m, 4H).
Figure 1. ORTEP diagrams of SLUG-9 (a) and SLUG-16 (b; triflate
anions omitted for clarity). Thermal ellipsoids are calculated at 50%
probability.
Four of the cluster capping oxygen atoms are likely
protonated. The distances of these oxygen atoms from
the plane of the three Bi atoms which they bridge are
˚
˚
as follows: O(1) = 1.101(7) A, O(3) = 1.106(7) A, O(4) =
Results and Discussion
˚
˚
1.108(7) A, and O(6) = 1.127(6) A. The rest of the cluster
oxygens are likely unprotonated as their distances from
the planes of the metals that they bridge are much smaller
SLUG-9. The synthesis of [Bi6O4(OH)4(H2O)2][(CH2)2-
(SO3)2]3 is straightforward and results in a pure phase of
the structure with high yield (90%). The Bi2O3 reagent
does not dissolve in the water before the autoclave is
heated, but the reaction conditions are sufficient to dis-
solve the reagent. The resulting colorless crystals are
large in size (average ca. 400 ꢀ 400 ꢀ 200 μm3) and block
shaped. The complex consists of an octahedral core of Bi
atoms. Each face of the octahedron is bridged by one
oxygen atom (μ3-oxo). These bridging oxygens have short-
er than usual bond distances to the Bi atoms [ranging from
˚
than the four hydroxyl groups: O(2)=0.319(6) A, O(5)=
˚
˚
˚
0.386(7) A, O(7) = 0.356(7) A, and O(8) = 0.465(6) A.
For charge balance, four cluster hydroxyls would give the
entire cluster a net charge of þ6. The three disulfonate
groups balance this charge and link the clusters with
Bi-O-S covalent bonds as well as two long electrostatic
contacts [Bi(3)-O(12) = 2.712(7) and Bi(1)-O(26)A =
˚
2.751(7) A] (Figure 1a). The bismuth cluster is coordi-
nated by two oxygen atoms on each end of the ethanedi-
sulfonate molecules. The third ethanedisulfonate coordi-
nates by only one oxygen atom, Bi(2) to O(11). The
organosulfonate groups cross-link to adjacent Bi octahe-
dra resulting in a 3D metal-organic network. The clus-
ters are discrete from each other and arranged in an
alternating manner, nearly resembling cubic close packed
(Figure 2a,b). The experimental powder pattern of
SLUG-9 matches closely to the theoretical pattern gen-
erated by the structure solution (Figure 3).
SLUG-16. The entire product after recovery was a crop
of colorless plates (average size ca. 450 ꢀ 400 ꢀ 20 μm3).
The product was synthesized in nearly 90% yield, a
significant improvement over the 70% yield reported
for the first nonabismuth cluster compound.10 After the
product had dried, a small amount of sample was used for
PXRD analysis. The resultant PXRD pattern (Figure 3)
could not be matched to any known phase. A suitable
single crystal was selected for SCXRD, and the structure
solution confirmed that the product is a new crystal
structure. The close agreement between the experimental
PXRD pattern and the pattern projected from single
˚
2.119(6) to 2.505(6) A, (Supporting Information, Table
S1); mean Bi-O distance = 2.424 ( 0.245 A: CSD].23 Two
˚
of the bismuth atoms have a terminal oxygen [O(9) and
O(10)], which are most likely water molecules. Hydrogen
atoms could not be observed, however, in the Fourier
difference electron density maps because of the high elec-
tron density of the six bismuth atoms. The bond distances
˚
are 2.618(7) and 2.671(7) A for Bi(2)-O(9) and Bi(5)-
O(10), respectively (Supporting Information, Table S1).
These distances are longer than the average Bi-O bond
˚
(∼ 2.5 A: CSD), indicating that they may be coordinated
water molecules. Further evidence for water molecules is
,
corroborated by the FTIR spectrum (3300 to 3500 cm-1
Supporting Information, Figure S1). Bound hydroxyl is
also evident in the infrared spectrum.
(20) APEX-II, 2.1.4; Bruker-AXS: Madison, WI, 2007.
(21) SHELXTL, Crystal Structure Determination Package; Bruker Analy-
tical X-ray Systems Inc.: Madison, WI, 1995-99.
(22) Brandenburg, K.; Putz, H. Diamond, 3.1; Crystal Iimpact: Bonn,
Germany, 2007.
(23) Allen, F. H. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 2002, No. 58, 380–388.