Zhu et al.
157
Fig. 1. The effect of reaction time on % conversion of H2O2 to
peroxodiphosphate in a strong acid solution such as HClO4
(eq. [3]) (13).
H3PO5 (P2O5:H2O2 = 0.5:1, 70 wt % H2O2, 2°C).
HCIO4
4–
100
[3]
P2O8 + H2O → H3PO5 + H3PO4
80
60
40
20
0
Unfortunately, the extreme reagents, combined with the
high costs and the low peroxy acid yields have hindered its
utilization in large-scale commercial applications. Several
other methods for preparing H3PO5 have been utilized and
include electrolysis of solutions of phosphates (14), as well
as the reaction of H4P2O7 with hydrogen peroxide (15).
However, none of these methods gave reasonable yields of
H3PO5. In this study we report a novel method for the prepa-
ration of H3PO5 in high yields.
0
30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
Reaction time (min)
Experimental
trated with sodium thiosulfate (0.1 N) to a starch end point.
The amount (%) of peroxy acid and hydrogen peroxide was
calculated according to eqs. [4] and [5], respectively.
Materials
Phosphorous pentoxide (ACS reagent grade), carbon tetra-
chloride (ACS reagent grade), ceric sulfate (0.25 N), sodium
thiosulfate (0.1 N), potassium iodide (1.0 N), Ferroin (1,10-
phenanthroline ferrous sulfate), sulfuric acid (ACS reagent
grade), and glacial acetic acid were purchased from Aldrich
Chemicals and used as received. Hydrogen peroxide (70%
and 90%) was obtained from FMC Corporation (Tonamanda,
N.Y.). DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid) and DTMPA
(diethylenetriaminepentamethylene phosphonic acid) were
gifts from Buchman Chemicals Inc. All solutions were pre-
pared in deionized water.
[4]
% peroxy acid =
mL Na2S2O3 × 0.1N × 0.038 ×100
sample weight
[5]
% hydrogen peroxide =
mL Ce(SO4)2 × 0.1N × 0.017 ×100
sample weight
Results and discussion
H3PO5 synthesis
Analogous to the work of Toennies (10), we have focused
on moderating the reaction between H2O2 and P2O5
(eq. [1]). To avoid some of the problems associated with
acetonitrile, we have chosen an inert solvent, CCl4, which
unlike acetonitrile is inert to most oxidants, and neither P2O5
nor H2O2 are soluble in it.
In a typical preparation, the reaction mixture was mixed
for no longer than 3 h to maximize peroxy acid yield
(Fig. 1). Careful control of the reaction system is required,
as longer reaction times result in lower yields of H3PO5 be-
cause of the slow reaction between H3PO5 and H2O2
(eq. [6]).
In the preparation of H3PO5, P2O5 (17.0 g, 0.061 mole)
was suspended in CCl4 (10 mL), and the suspension was
cooled in an ice bath to a temperature of ~2°C while being
vigorously stirred. Aqueous hydrogen peroxide (0.121 mole,
5 mL of 70 wt %) was then added dropwise to the suspen-
sion, while the reaction temperature was carefully moni-
tored. CAUTION: the addition rate of H2O2 must be
carefully controlled to maintain the reaction temperature be-
low 5°C. If the addition of H2O2 is too fast, the reaction is
too vigorous and a violent exotherm can occur. However, if
the addition of H2O2 is too slow, the P2O5 powder will tend
to form larger aggregate particles, which are slow to react
with the H2O2 and result in the accumulation of H2O2, and a
potentially violent reaction can occur. Therefore, careful
monitoring of the temperature while adding H2O2 at a suffi-
cient rate to minimize P2O5 aggregation is required. Upon
complete addition of H2O2 the biphasic reaction system was
further stirred, for up to 3 h, to maximize peroxy acid yield
(Fig. 1); prolonged mixing can lead to decreased H3PO5
yields. The aqueous phase was separated and the CCl4 layer
was extracted 2–3 times with deionized water (5 mL) to ex-
tract the H3PO5 along with phosphoric acid and hydrogen
peroxide. The aqueous solutions were combined and the
concentration of H3PO5 and H2O2 were determined by
chemical methods. Accordingly, a sample of the reaction
mixture (0.2 mL) was acidified with H2SO4 (200 mL, 1 N
H2SO4) and cooled in an ice bath to permit titration within a
temperature range of 0–10°C. Three drops of Ferroin solu-
tion was added, and the mixture was titrated with 0.1 N ceric
sulfate until the disappearance of the salmon color. KI
(5 mL, 1.0 N KI) was added, and the iodine liberated was ti-
[6]
H3PO5 + H2O2 → H3PO4 + H2O + O2
By controlling the volume of CCl4, the stirring speed, and
the rate of the addition of hydrogen peroxide, approximately
70% of H2O2 was converted to H3PO5 at a mole ratio
P2O5:H2O2 = 0.5:1. To the best of our knowledge such a
high conversion ratio has never been reported.
Effect of P2O5:H2O2 on the preparation of H3PO5
The conversion ratio of H3PO5 based on H2O2 can be in-
creased by increasing the mole ratio of P2O5:H2O2 (Fig. 2).
When the mole ratio of P2O5:H2O2 is greater than 0.9, 100%
conversion was achieved.
Effect of H2O2 concentration
The effect of H2O2 concentration on the preparation of
H3PO5 is shown in Fig. 3. As expected, the concentration of
H2O2 had a dramatic influence on the generation of H3PO5.
Increasing the peroxide concentration decreases the amount
© 2003 NRC Canada