1
330
S. Chandra et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 79 (2011) 1326–1330
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the UGC (New Delhi) for financial
support, SAIF, IIT (Bombay) for recording ESR spectra, the Head,
App Sci. and Dean FET for recording molecular modeling data.
References
[
[
1] E.V. Rybak-Akimova, A.Y. Nazarenko, S.S. Silchenco, Inorg. Chem. 38 (1999)
974–2980.
2] A.J. Blake, J. Casebo, F.A. Devillanova, L. Escriche, A. Garau, F. Isaia, V. Lippolis,
R. Kivekas, V. Muns, M. Schroder, R. Sillanpaa, G. Verani, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. (1999) 1085–1200.
2
[
3] M.D. Satana, A.A. Lozano, G. Garcia, G. Lopez, J. Perez, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
(
2005) 104–109.
4] R.M. Izatt, J.S. Bradshaeo, S.A. Nielon, J.D. Lamb, J.J. Christensen, Chem. Rev. 85
1985) 271–339.
[
(
[
[
5] R. Izatt, K. Pawlak, J.S. Bradshaw, Chem. Rev. 91 (1991) 1721–2085.
6] H. Khanmohammodi, S. Amani, H. Lanng, T. Riieffer, Inorg. Chim. Acta 360
(
2007) 579–587.
Fig. 5. Geometry Optimized structure of ligand–Cu(II) complex.
[
[
7] D.S. Kumar, V. Alexander, Polyhedron 18 (1999) 1561–1568.
8] J.C.G. Bunzil, G.R. Choppin, Lanthanide Probes in Life, Chemical and Earth Sci-
ences, Elsevier, Amesterdem, 1989.
[
9] S. IIhan, H. Temel, J. Mol. Struct. 89 (2008) 157–162.
plane (0.06 A˚ above) of the equatorial NNOO donor system. The
[10] S. Chandra, A.K. Sharma, Spectrochim. Acta A 72 (2009) 851–857.
[11] A. Choudhary, S. Dave, R. Swaroop, R.V. Singh, J. Ind. Chem. Soc. 79 (2002)
71–373.
12] S. Chandra, L.K. Gupta, Spectochim. Acta A 62 (2005) 307–312.
[13] E. Tas, A. Kilic, M. Durgun, L. Kupecik, I. Yilmaz, S. Arslan, Spectochim. Acta A
5 (2010) 811–818.
◦
mean planes of the two flanking phenyl groups are at angle of 73.40
3
◦
with each other and at 38.3 and 47.9 with the central phenyl group.
[
The N–N and O–O bite distances are 2.77 and 3.22 A˚ respectively.
The equatorial Ni(II)–O distances are 2.12 and 1.95 A˚ respectively
and the Ni(II)–N distances being 1.88 and 1.97 A˚ . The axial positions
7
[
[
14] K.S. Suslick, T.J. Reinert, J. Chem. Educ. 62 (1988) 974–983.
15] L. Mishra, K. Bindu, S. Bhattacharya, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 7 (2004) 777–780.
are occupied by one oxygen atom of the ligand and a chloride ion.
[16] M.D. Cohen, G.M.J. Schmidt, J. Phys. Chem. 66 (1962) 2442–2445.
[17] S.Y. Yu, S.X. Wang, Q.H. Luo, L.F. Wang, Polyhedron 12 (1993) 1093–1096.
◦
The Cl49–Ni1–O27 bond angle is near to perpendicular (98.93 ).
[
[
18] S. Rekha, K.R. Nagasundara, Indian J. Chem. A 45 (2006) 2421–2425.
19] A.A. Jarrahpour, M. Motamedifar, K. Pakshir, N. Hadi, M. Zarei, Molecules 9
(2004) 815–824.
The axial Ni(II)–O distance being 1.83 A˚ and the Ni(II)–Cl distance
is 2.15 A˚ . The Cl149–Ni1–O27 bond angle is near to perpendicular
◦
[20] P.G. Ramappa, K.B. Somasekharappa, Indian J. Chem. A 33 (1994) 66–68.
(
98.93 ).
[21] H. Ünver, Z. Hayvali, Spectrochim. Acta A 75 (2010) 782–788.
[22] A.A. Khander, S.A. Hosseini-Yazdi, Polyhedron 22 (2003) 1481–1487.
[23] L.F. Lindoy, L.F. Armstrong, Inorg. Chem. 14 (1975) 1322–1326.
The ligand–Cu(II) complex has tetragonal geometry with the
equatorial positions being occupied by the two O and two N donor
atom (Fig. 5). The Cu(II) ion lies on the mean plane of the equa-
torial NNOO donor system. The mean planes of the two flanking
[24] W.J. Geary, Coord. Chem. Rev. 7 (1971) 81–122.
[25] S. Chandra, L.K. Gupta, Spectrochim. Acta A 60 (2004) 2767–2774.
[26] S. Chandra, L.K. Gupta, Spectrochim. Acta A 60 (2004) 3079–3085.
[27] K. Nakamoto, Infrared Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds,
Wiley Interscience, New York, 1970.
◦
phenyl groups are at an angle of 60.87 with each other and
◦
at 36.1 and 39.9 with the central phenyl group. The N–N and
[
[
28] S. Chandra, L.K. Gupta, Spectrochim. Acta A 60 (2004) 2411–2417.
29] (a) M. Shakir, A.K. Mohamed, O.S.M. Nasman, Polyhedron 15 (1996) 3490–3497;
O–O bond distances are 2.74 and 3.20 A˚ respectively. The equa-
torial Cu(II)–O distances are 2.00 and 1.99 A˚ respectively and the
Cu(II)–N distances being 2.04 and 1.93 A˚ . The axial positions are
(
b) S. Chandra, K. Gupta, Trans. Met. Chem. 27 (2002) 329–332;
(c) V.V. Pavlishchuk, S.P. Kulotilov, A.W. Addison, R.J. Butcher, E. Sinn, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans. (2000) 335–341.
occupied by one oxygen atom of the ligand and a chloride ion. The
[
[
30] K.G. Kocwin, W. Wojciechowski, Trans. Met. Chem. 21 (1996) 312–316.
31] J.W. Searl, R.C. Smith, S.J. Wayard, Proc. Phys. Soc. 74 (1959) 491–502.
◦
O27–Cu1–Cl49 bond angle is nearly perpendicular (91.1 ), while
◦
O27–Cu1–O43 angle is 78.6 . The axial Cu(II)–O distance is 1.84 A˚
[32] B.J. Trzebiatowska, J. Lisowski, A. Vogt, P. Chmielewskti, Polyhedron 7 (1988)
37–380.
and the Cu(II)–Cl distance is 2.24 A˚ [35–39].
3
[
33] B.J. Hathaway, D.E. Billing, Coord. Chem. Rev. 5 (1970) 143–207.
[
34] J.J.P. Stewart, Stewart Computational, Chemistry, Version: 7.334W, MOPAC,
2
007.
4
. Conclusion
[35] J.J.P. Stewart, Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods V: mod-
ification of NDDO approximations and application to 70 elements, J. Mol. Mod.
1
3 (2007) 1213–1219.
Ni(II) and Cu(II) complexes with a pentadentate macrocyclic lig-
[
36] M.X. Li, M. Shao, H. Dai, B.L. An, W.C. Lu, Y. Zhu, C.X. Du, Chin. Chem. Lett. 16
(2005) 1405–1407.
and have been prepared and characterized. On the basis of above
spectral studies and molecular modeling a distorted octahedral
geometry has been assigned for Ni(II) and tetragonal geometry for
Cu(II) complexes. Various ligand field and bonding parameters have
been calculated and discussed.
[37] S.K. Deya, B. Bag, D.K. Dey, V. Gramlich, Y. Li, S. Mitra, Z. Naturforsch. 58 (2003)
009–1014.
1
[
[
38] A. Datta, N.K. Karan, S. Mitra, G. Rosair, Z. Naturforsch. 57 (2002) 999–1002.
39] K.Y. Choi, Y.S. Kim, H. Ryu, I.H. Suh, G.H. Choo, J.G. Kim, M.J. Kim, Kor. J. Crys-
tallogr. 11 (2000) 147–150.