Table 1 Products obtained under irradiation at 420 nm for 16 hours
of gaseous DBS in the presence of POMTF or grafted silica powder
(DBSO: di-n-butyl sulfoxide, DBSO2: di-n-butyl sulfone
of the excited PS because of the presence of large amounts of
pre-adsorbed DMS. Thus only sulfide is activated, most
probably by electron transfer,11 yielding disulfide as the main
initial product.
[PS]/
mol Lꢁ1
DBS
l/nm (%)
DBSO DBSO2
(%)
(%)
rb
In summary, mesoporous organised thin films containing
two different sensitisers have been prepared. Hybrid POMTFs
are efficient in both static and dynamic mode under visible
light. The photo-oxidative properties of these highly trans-
parent films at the gas–solid interface over sulfide pollutants
were shown to be enhanced compared to more light-scattering
silica powders. Mesoporosity is not only responsible for the
high transparency of the films, but also for different selectivity,
probably arising from the different environments of sulfides
inside the pores.
Blank film
POMTF-1
POMTF-1
POMTF-2
0
420
420
—
420
420
100
5
75
74
11
0
0
51
0
Traces
22
0
0.14
0.14
0.45
44
25
26
67
3000
3000
850
a
Si-powder-1 0.8
100
a
b
Laboratory daylight. Molar ratio between DBS and sensitiser.
were also obtained, but in lower yield due to shorter
irradiation time under visible (natural/artificial) light and
lower light power.
Notes and references
z Irradiation at 420 nm of an acetonitrile solution of DBS (2.5 ꢂ 10ꢁ2 M)
The oxidation of another well-known volatile pollutant,
DMS, was carried out in a one-pass gas-phase reactor. Six
POMTF-2 (2 ꢂ 1 cm) samples were placed in a thermo-
regulated reactor (scheme in ESIw). Dry air containing DMS
at a defined concentration (about 110 ppmv) was flowed over
the films at a 20 mL minꢁ1 flow rate. The reactor was
irradiated with 16 lamps at 420 nm and the gas at the
outlet of the reactor was analysed by GC-FID. A typical
concentration curve with POMTF-2 is given in Fig. 4.
After an equilibrium adsorption step in the dark, lamps
were switched on. The DMS concentration sharply dropped,
while disulfide concentration first increased and then smoothly
dropped. After 5 hours irradiation, a photostationary state
was reached: dimethyl sulfone (DMSO2) and dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO) appeared in the gas flow, while DMDS
concentration decreased. 76 hours of irradiation were needed
to recover the initial DMS concentration. In this case, the
molar ratio between total introduced DMS and the sensitiser
was about 1 : 1800.
containing
distribution, sulfoxide : sulfone : disulfide 65 : 19 : 10.
1
(8.2
ꢂ
10ꢁ5 M) leads to the following product
1 M. Oelgemoller, C. Jung and J. Mattay, Pure Appl. Chem., 2006,
79, 1939–1947.
2 M. I. Burguete, F. Galindo, R. Gavara, S. V. Luis, M. Moreno,
P. Thomas and D. A. Russell, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2009, 8,
37–44; S. H. Cheng, C. H. Lee, C. S. Yang, F. G. Tseng, C. Y. Mou
and L. W. Lo, J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 1252–1257.
3 E. E. Coyle and M. Oelgemoller, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2008,
7, 1313–1322.
4 N. A. Kuznetsova, D. A. Makarov, O. L. Kaliya and
G. N. Vorozhtsov, J. Hazard. Mater., 2006, 146, 487–491.
5 C. Sanchez, B. Lebeau, F. Chaput and J. P. Boilot, Adv. Mater.,
2003, 15, 1969–1994.
6 F. Mammeri, E. Le Bourhis, L. Rozes and C. Sanchez, J. Mater.
Chem., 2005, 15, 3787–3811.
7 C. Cantau, T. Pigot, R. Brown, P. Mocho, M. T. Maurette,
E. Benoit-Marque and S. Lacombe, Appl. Catal., B, 2006, 65, 77–85.
8 C. Cantau, T. Pigot, N. Manoi, E. Oliveros and S. Lacombe,
ChemPhysChem, 2007, 8, 2344–2353.
9 D. Chandra, S. Mridha, D. Basak and A. Bhaumik, Chem.
Commun., 2009, 2384–2386; K. A. Killian, T. Bocking and
¨
This latter one-pass experiment allows to monitor the
oxidation reaction in situ under continuous sulfide flow. It
emphasises a favoured initial formation of disulfide inside the
mesoporous films where sulfide was previously adsorbed. Once
adsorbed sulfide first reacts to yield mainly disulfide, singlet
oxygen addition to sulfide preferentially yields sulfoxide and
sulfone along with disulfide. This result implies that at the
beginning of the reaction oxygen slowly diffuses to the vicinity
J. J. Gooding, Chem. Commun., 2009, 630–640.
10 C. J. Brinker, Y. Lu, A. Sellinger and H. Fan, Adv. Mater., 1999,
11, 579–585.
11 H. Y. Fan, Y. F. Lu, A. Stump, S. T. Reed, T. Baer, R. Schunk,
L. V. Perez, G. P. Lopez and C. J. Brinker, Nature, 2000, 405,
56–60; P. Innocenzi, T. Kidchob, P. Falcaro and M. Takahashi,
Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 607–614; Y. Lu, H. Fan, A. Stump,
T. L. Ward, T. Rieker and C. J. Brinker, Nature, 1999, 398,
223–226; J. B. Pang, J. N. Stuecker, Y. B. Jiang, A. J. Bhakta,
E. D. Branson, P. Li, J. Cesarano, D. Sutton, P. Calvert and
C. J. Brinker, Small, 2008, 4, 982–989.
12 V. Latour, T. Pigot, M. Simon, H. Cardy and S. Lacombe,
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2005, 4, 221–229.
13 C. Sanchez, C. Boissiere, D. Grosso, C. Laberty and L. Nicole,
Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 682–737.
14 F. Cagnol, D. Grosso, G. J. A. A. Soler-Illia, E. L. Crepaldi,
F. Babonneau, H. Amenitsch and C. Sanchez, J. Mater. Chem.,
2003, 13, 61–66.
15 T. Berthelot, J. C. Talbot, G. Lain, G. Deleris and L. Latxague,
J. Pept. Sci., 2005, 11, 153–160.
16 M. Etienne, A. Quach, D. Grosso, L. Nicole, C. Sanchez and
A. Walcarius, Chem. Mater., 2007, 19, 844–856.
17 D. Y. Zhao, P. D. Yang, D. I. Margolese, B. F. Chmelka and
G. D. Stucky, Chem. Commun., 1998, 2499–2500.
18 C. Boissiere, D. Grosso, S. Lepoutre, L. Nicole, A. Brunet-
Bruneau and C. Sanchez, Langmuir, 2005, 21, 12362–12371.
19 E. L. Clennan, W. Zhou and J. Chan, J. Org. Chem., 2002, 67,
9368–9378.
Fig. 4 DMS oxidation products detected during irradiation of
POMTF-2 at 420 nm (DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO2: dimethyl
sulfone, DMDS: dimethyl disulfide Me–S–S–Me).
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
Chem. Commun., 2009, 5281–5283 | 5283