Communication
Green Chemistry
1 Biorefineries – Industrial processes and products. Status quo
and future directions, ed. B. Kamm, P. R. Gruber and M.
Kamm, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2010.
Conclusions
In summary, this communication reports successfully for the
first time the use of lyases as biocatalysts for the umpolung
carboligation to upgrade HMF to C12 platform chemicals.
Under non-optimized conditions initial rates of ∼7 g hydroxy-
ketone 2 L−1 h−1 have been observed, with accumulation of the
product up to 35 g L−1. Moreover, aqueous mixtures of furfural
and HMF can be valorized, leading to blended C10–C12 compo-
sition, promising for further hydrogenation to deliver tailored
blends. For these synthetic approaches, the further choice of a
better cosolvent – rather than challenging DMSO –, together
with biocatalyst design and process set-up (e.g. use of immobi-
lized BAL or immobilised whole-cells overexpressing BAL) may
certainly deliver robust reaction conditions for the valorization
of biogenic furans, furfural and HMF. The intrinsic reactivity
makes the biocatalytic approach highly appealing for further
research and development. Furthermore, the formation of
novel DES may lead to novel exciting applications of them as
biomaterials and/or solvents.
We would like to thank Dr Catherine Lyall (Bath, UK) for
her outstanding assistance in the NMR analysis, and grate-
fully acknowledge financial support from DFG training group
1166 “BioNoCo” (“Biocatalysis in Non-conventional Media”).
The authors would also like to extend their thanks to the
EPSRC for partially funding this work through the Doctoral
Training Centre in Sustainable Chemical Technologies (EP/
G03768X/1) and to Roger and Sue Whorrod for their kind
endowment to the University resulting in the Whorrod
Fellowship in Sustainable Chemical Technologies held by
Dr C. Chuck.
2 (a) R. J. van Putten, J. C. van der Waal, E. de Jong,
C. B. Rasrendra, H. J. Heeres and J. G. de Vries, Chem. Rev.,
2013, 113, 1499; (b) S. Lima, M. M. Antunes, M. Pillinger
and A. A. Valente, ChemCatChem, 2011, 3, 1686;
(c) A. A. Rosatella, S. P. Simeonov, R. F. M. Frade and
C. A. M. Afonso, Green Chem., 2011, 13, 754;
(d) M. E. Zakrzewska, E. Bogel-Lukasik and R. Bogel-
Lukasik, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 397.
3 Recent examples on HMF synthesis: (a) P. M. Grande,
C. Bergs and P. Domínguez de María, ChemSusChem, 2012,
5, 1203; (b) L. Lai and Y. Zhang, ChemSusChem, 2011, 4,
1745; (c) R. Huang, W. Qi, R. Su and Z. He, Chem.
Commun., 2010, 46, 1115; (d) B. Kim, J. Jeong, S. Shin,
D. Lee, S. Kim, H. J. Yoon and J. K. Cho, ChemSusChem,
2010, 3, 1273; (e) S. Hu, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhou, J. Song, H. Fan
and B. Han, Green Chem., 2009, 11, 873.
4 See, for instance: (a) M. Krystof, M. Pérez-Sánchez and
P. Domínguez de María, ChemSusChem, 2013, 6, 630;
(b) M. Krystof, M. Pérez-Sánchez and P. Domínguez de
María, ChemSusChem, 2013, 6, 826.
5 (a) B. L. Wegenhart, L. Yang, S. C. Kwan, R. Harris,
H. I. Kenttärmaa and M. M. Abu-Omar, ChemSusChem,
2014, 9, 2742; (b) E. Y.-X. Chen and D. Liu, US 20140007497
A1, 2014; (c) D. Liu and E. Y.-X. Chen, Green Chem., 2014,
16, 964; (d) D. Liu and E. Y.-X. Chen, ACS Catal., 2014, 4,
1302; (e) D. Liu and E. Y.-X. Chen, ChemSusChem, 2013, 6,
2236; (f) D. Liu, Y. Zhang and E. Y.-X. Chen, Green Chem.,
2012, 14, 2738.
6 See, for instance, (a) U. T. Bornscheuer, G. Huisman,
R. J. Kazlauskas, S. Lutz, J. Moore and K. Robins, Nature,
2012, 485, 185; (b) A. Liese, K. Seelbach and C. Wandrey,
Industrial Biotransformations, Wiley-VCH, 2nd edn,
2006.
7 (a) A. Jakoblinnert, R. Mladenov, A. Paul, F. Sibilla,
U. Schwaneberg, M. B. Ansorge-Schumacher and
P. Domínguez de María, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 12230;
(b) R. L. Hanson, B. L. Davis, Y. Chen, S. L. Goldberg,
W. L. Parker, T. P. Tully, M. A. Montana and R. N. Patel,
Adv. Synth. Catal., 2008, 350, 1367; (c) A. Panova,
L. Mersinger, Q. Liu, T. Foo, D. Roe, W. Spillan,
A. Sigmund, A. Ben-Bassat, L. Wagner, D. O’Keefe, S. Wu,
K. Petrillo, M. Payne, S. Breske, F. Gallagher and
R. DiCossimo, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2007, 349, 1462.
8 (a) M. Brovetto, D. Gamenara, P. Saenz Méndez and
G. A. Seoane, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 4346; (b) P. Hoyos,
J. V. Sinisterra, F. Molinari, A. R. Alcántara and
P. Domínguez de María, Acc. Chem. Res., 2010, 43,
288.
9 (a) C. R. Müller, M. Pérez-Sánchez and P. Domínguez de
María, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 2000; (b) P. Ayhan and
A. S. Demir, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2011, 353, 624;
(c) S. Shanmuganathan, D. Natalia, A. Van den Wittenboer,
C. Kohlmann, L. Greiner and P. Domínguez de María,
Notes and references
§Benzaldehyde lyase from Pseudomonas fluorescens was cloned and overex-
pressed in E. coli cells, and produced by fermentation.9 After fermentation,
BAL was lyophilized and stored at −20 °C until use. BAL characterization was
performed using benzaldehyde as substrate, and benzoin formation as reaction
test, as reported elsewhere.9 Standard reaction with BAL for HMF carboligation.
To a mixture of 40 mL potassium phosphate buffer (pH 8) with DMSO (20 vol%)
was added ThDP (2 mg, 4.03
×
10−3 mmol) and BAL (40 mg). HMF
(100.89 mg, 0.8 mmol) was then added to the reaction and the vessel stop-
pered. The reaction was allowed to stir for 18 h at room temperature. The reac-
tion was quenched by addition of 80 mL EtOAc and the product extracted into
the same. EtOAc was removed under reduced pressure and the product dried
under high vacuum. Characterisation was effected through NMR spectroscopy.
Standard reaction with BAL with aqueous mixtures of furfural and HMF. To mix-
tures of 20 mL potassium phosphate buffer (pH 8) with DMSO (20 vol%) was
added ThDP (1 mg, 2.02 × 10−3 mmol) and BAL (20 mg). HMF and furfural
were then added in varying molar proportions (75/25, 50/50, 25/75) to make up
0.4 mmol total substrate and the reaction vessels stoppered. The reactions were
allowed to stir for 18 h at room temperature. The reactions were quenched by
addition of 40 mL EtOAc and the products extracted into the same. EtOAc was
removed under reduced pressure and the products dried under high vacuum.
Characterisation was effected through NMR spectroscopy and mass spec-
trometry. DES formation. 100 mg (0.41 mmol) HMF hydroxyl-ketone 2 and
59.0 mg choline chloride (0.41 mmol) (both solids) were stirred in a GC vial in
a molar ratio of 1 : 1 at 60–70 °C for ∼1 hour. When cooled down, the viscous
liquid remained.
Green Chem.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015