assume that its equatorial position and the axial position for the hydroxyl in relation to the piperidine ring will
be more favorable. During heterocyclization this will lead to preferential formation of the products with the
axial orientation of the C–O bond in relation to the piperidine ring. The mixture of isomers contains twice as
much of the isomer 7 as of 8, which can be explained by the stronger donating effect of the cyclohexyl
substituent.
EXPERIMENTAL
The IR spectra of the compounds were recorded on a Specord M-80 spectrometer in thin layers (for the
1
13
liquids) and in tablets with potassium bromide (for the crystalline samples). The H and C NMR spectra were
recorded in deuterochloroform on a Mercury-300 spectrometer (300 and 75 MHz respectively) with HMDS as
internal and external standard (δ 0.05 ppm). Thin-layer chromatography was conducted on Silufol UV-254 plates
with a mixture of 2-propanol and 20% ammonia solution (9.9:0.7) as eluant and with development in iodine
vapor. The mass spectra were recorded on a Hewlett Packard gas chromatograph with an MSD HP-5972 mass-
selective detector at 70 eV ionization energy.*
1-(2-Ethoxyethyl)-4-hydroxy-4-[2-(1-hydroxycyclohexyl)ethynyl]piperidine (3). To
a
flask
containing powdered potassium hydroxide (12.09 g, 0.216 mol) and anhydrous ether (50 ml) with cooling to
-4°C and vigorous stirring we added dropwise a mixture of 1-(2-ethoxyethyl)piperidin-4-one (1) (13.30 g,
0.07 mol) and ethynylcyclohexanol (2) (8.94 g, 0.07 mol). The mixture was stirred with cooling in iced water,
left overnight, and stirred the next day at room temperature for a further 7 h. The reaction was monitored by
TLC. At the end of the reaction the mixture was cooled to -4°C and decomposed with water. The ether layer was
separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate. The extracts were dried with anhydrous
magnesium sulfate. After distillation of the greater part of the solvent the precipitate that separated was removed
and washed with petroleum ether. We obtained 13.0 g (53%) of the glycol 3; mp 109-111°C. Found %: C 69.01;
H 9.90; N 4.98. C17H29NO3. Calculated %: C 69.11; H 9.89; N 4.73.
Hydrochloride 3a. Compound 3a (mp 130-132°C, ethanol–ether) was obtained by treating a solution of
the base 3 in ether with a solution of HCl in propanol. IR spectrum (in potassium bromide), ν, cm-1: 3336 (OH),
2700-2580 (NH+), 2144 (C≡C), 1120 (C–O–C), 1072 (C–O). Found %: C 66.66; H 9.36; Cl 10.72; N 3.43.
C17H29ClNO3. Calculated %: C 61.52; H 9.11; Cl 10.68; N 3.21.
After evaporation of the mother solutions and washing (the acidic solutions were first neutralized) and
distillation of the unreacted ketone 1 3.5 g of the glycol 4 was isolated. It did not differ in melting point
(106-107°C) and spectral data from an authentic sample [5].
3-(2'-Ethoxyethyl)-14(15)-oxo-7-oxa-3-azadispiro[5,1,5,2]pentadecane (7) and (8). A mixture of the
glycol 3 (4.95 g, 0.016 mol) and HgSO4 (1.0 g) in 10% sulfuric acid (50 ml) was stirred at 90°C for 10 h. At the
end of the reaction the precipitate was filtered off, and the solution was neutralized with potassium carbonate and
extracted with ethyl acetate. The extract was dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate. The ethyl acetate was
distilled, the residue was distilled under vacuum, the fraction boiling at 164-172°C (1 mm Hg) was collected,
and 3 g (65.7%) of an oily substance was obtained. After redistillation it boiled at 170°C (1 mm Hg).
IR spectrum (in potassium bromide), ν, cm-1: 3336 (OH), 1720 (C=O), 1120 (C–O–C). Found %: C 69.20;
H 9.90; N 7.41. C17H29NO3. Calculated %: C 69.11; H 9.89; N 4.73.
_______
* The authors express their gratitude to A. E. Lyuts for recording the mass spectra.
1388