Welcome to LookChem.com Sign In|Join Free
  • or
Ir(Me)(Ph)(κ3-C6H3-2,6-(CH2P(tert-butyl)2)2) is a chemical with a specific purpose. Lookchem provides you with multiple data and supplier information of this chemical.

1047682-79-0

Post Buying Request

1047682-79-0 Suppliers

Recommended suppliers

  • Product
  • FOB Price
  • Min.Order
  • Supply Ability
  • Supplier
  • Contact Supplier

1047682-79-0 Usage

Check Digit Verification of cas no

The CAS Registry Mumber 1047682-79-0 includes 10 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 7 digits, 1,0,4,7,6,8 and 2 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 7 and 9 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 1047682-79:
(9*1)+(8*0)+(7*4)+(6*7)+(5*6)+(4*8)+(3*2)+(2*7)+(1*9)=170
170 % 10 = 0
So 1047682-79-0 is a valid CAS Registry Number.

1047682-79-0Downstream Products

1047682-79-0Relevant academic research and scientific papers

Combined experimental and computational studies on carbon-carbon reductive elimination from bis(hydrocarbyl) complexes of (PCP)Ir

Ghosh, Rajshekhar,Emge, Thomas J.,Krogh-Jespersen, Karsten,Goldman, Alan S.

, p. 11317 - 11327 (2008)

The reductive elimination of carbon-carbon bonds is one of the most fundamentally and synthetically important reaction steps in organometallic chemistry, yet relatively little is understood about the factors that govern the kinetics of this reaction. C-C elimination from complexes with the common d6 six-coordinate configuration generally proceeds via prior ligand loss, which greatly complicates any attempt to directly measure the rates of the specific elimination step. We report the synthesis of a series of five-coordinate d6 iridium complexes, (tBuPCP)Ir(R) (Ra?2), where R and Ra?2 are Me, Ph, and (phenyl-substituted) vinyl and alkynyl groups. For several of these complexes (R/Ra?2 = Ph/Vi, Me/Me, Me/Vi, Me/CCPh, and Vi/CCPh, where Vi = trans-CH=CHPh) we have measured the absolute rate of C-C elimination. For R/Ra?2 = Ph/Ph, Ph/Me, and Ph/CCPh, we obtain upper limits to the elimination rate; and for R/Ra?2 = CCPh/CCPh, a lower limit. In general, the rates decrease (activation barriers increase) according to the following order: acetylide HPCP)Ir(R)(Ra?2). For example, the barrier to elimination from (HPCP)Ir(Me)2 is 20 kcal/mol, which is 2 kcal/mol greater than from the (tBuPCP)Ir analogue. In contrast, the activation enthalpies calculated for vinyl-vinyl and phenyl-phenyl elimination from (HPCP)Ir are remarkably low, only 2 and 9 kcal/mol, respectively; these values are 16 and 22 kcal/mol less than those of the corresponding (tBuPCP)Ir complexes. Moreover, since these eliminations are very nearly thermoneutral, the barriers are calculated to be equally low for the reverse reactions [C-C oxidative addition to ( HPCP)Ir]. The absence of differences in intraligand C=C bond lengths in the transition states relative to the ground states, combined with a comparison of calculated "face-on" and "planar" transition states for C-C coupling, suggests that the critical importance of the aryl/vinyl rotation is based on geometric or steric factors rather than electronic ones. Thus there is no evidence for participation of the ?? or ??* orbitale of the aryl or vinyl groups in the formation of the C-C bond, although a small ?? effect cannot be rigorously excluded. Likewise, the results do not support the hypothesis that the degree of directionality of the carbon-based orbital used for bonding to iridium (sp3 > sp2 > sp) plays an important role in this system in determining the barrier to reductive elimination. ? 2008 American Chemical Society.

Post a RFQ

Enter 15 to 2000 letters.Word count: 0 letters

Attach files(File Format: Jpeg, Jpg, Gif, Png, PDF, PPT, Zip, Rar,Word or Excel Maximum File Size: 3MB)

1 Customer Service

What can I do for you?
Get Best Price

Get Best Price for 1047682-79-0