Welcome to LookChem.com Sign In|Join Free

CAS

  • or

1076225-05-2

Post Buying Request

1076225-05-2 Suppliers

Recommended suppliersmore

  • Product
  • FOB Price
  • Min.Order
  • Supply Ability
  • Supplier
  • Contact Supplier

1076225-05-2 Usage

Check Digit Verification of cas no

The CAS Registry Mumber 1076225-05-2 includes 10 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 7 digits, 1,0,7,6,2,2 and 5 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 0 and 5 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 1076225-05:
(9*1)+(8*0)+(7*7)+(6*6)+(5*2)+(4*2)+(3*5)+(2*0)+(1*5)=132
132 % 10 = 2
So 1076225-05-2 is a valid CAS Registry Number.

1076225-05-2Downstream Products

1076225-05-2Relevant articles and documents

Synthetic, X-ray diffraction, electrochemical, and density functional theoretical studies of (indenyl)ruthenium complexes containing dithiolate ligands

Sin, Yee Ng,Tan, Jialin,Wai, Yip Fan,Weng, Kee Leong,Lai, Yoong Goh,Webster, Richard D.

, p. 3827 - 3840 (2008/03/14)

Halide substitution of the complexes [(Ind)Ru(L2)X] {Ind = η5-C9H7. 1: (L2) = dppf [1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphanyl)ferrocene], X = Cl; 2: (L2) = dppm [1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphanyl)methane], X = Cl; and 18: (L2) = (CO)2, X = I} with the 1,1-dithiolates -S 2CNR2 (dialkyl dithiocarbamates for R = Me, Et, and C 5H10), S2COR (alkyl xanthates for R = Et and iPr), and -S2PR2 (dithiophosphinates for R = Et and Ph) showed that the lability of the indenyl ligand is influenced by the nature of both the coligand and the incoming dithiolate, as well as the solvent. In addition to dithiolate derivatives, the reactions also produced the hydride species [(Ind)Ru(diphos)H] in solvent- and stoichiometry-dependent yields. The observed dependence of lability of Ind on (L2) follows the order, dppf 2, in agreement with the electron-donor capability of L2, as well as the estimation of lowest activation energy for the η5 → η3 ring slippage process in the series of complexes [(Ind)Ru(L)2(S2COMe)] (L = PMeH2, PH3, CO) for L = CO. The computational study also indicated an indenyl lability order for dithiolate substitution (dithiocarbamate > xanthate), in agreement with experimental findings. The dissociation of the indenyl ligand in chloro substitution of 1 by -S 2CNEt2 was found to be exhaustive in a polar solvent like MeOH, but only partial in CH2Cl2. Cyclic voltammetry experiments indicated that [(Ind)Ru(dppf)(η1-S2COiPr)] (10) and [(Ind)Ru(dppf)(η1-S2PPh2)] (13) can be oxidized in one-electron chemical irreversible or chemical reversible processes, respectively (at a scan rate of 100 mV/s), at about 0 V versus Fc/Fc+. Complex 13 underwent additional one-electron oxidation processes at +0.5 and +0.8 V versus Fc/Fc+. The new complexes have all been characterized spectroscopically, and some (four containing the indenyl ligand and three of the non-indenyl type) by X-ray diffraction as well. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2007.

Post a RFQ

Enter 15 to 2000 letters.Word count: 0 letters

Attach files(File Format: Jpeg, Jpg, Gif, Png, PDF, PPT, Zip, Rar,Word or Excel Maximum File Size: 3MB)

1

What can I do for you?
Get Best Price

Get Best Price for 1076225-05-2