Welcome to LookChem.com Sign In|Join Free
  • or
3,3-dimethyl-6-(1,1,2,2-tetracyanoethyl)-1,4-cyclohexadiene is a chemical with a specific purpose. Lookchem provides you with multiple data and supplier information of this chemical.

114693-82-2

Post Buying Request

114693-82-2 Suppliers

Recommended suppliers

  • Product
  • FOB Price
  • Min.Order
  • Supply Ability
  • Supplier
  • Contact Supplier

114693-82-2 Usage

Check Digit Verification of cas no

The CAS Registry Mumber 114693-82-2 includes 9 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 6 digits, 1,1,4,6,9 and 3 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 8 and 2 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 114693-82:
(8*1)+(7*1)+(6*4)+(5*6)+(4*9)+(3*3)+(2*8)+(1*2)=132
132 % 10 = 2
So 114693-82-2 is a valid CAS Registry Number.

114693-82-2Downstream Products

114693-82-2Relevant academic research and scientific papers

Aromatization of 1,4-Cyclohexadienes with Tetracyanoethylene: A Case of Varying Mechanisms

Jacobson, Barry M.,Soteropoulos, Patricia,Bahadori, Sheila

, p. 3247 - 3255 (1988)

The aromatization of 1,4-cyclohexadiene and four alkyl-substituted 1,4-cyclohexadienes with tetracyanoethylene was examined and found in four of five cases to involve two competing mechanisms.Most of each reaction proceeded by concerted ene addition followed by breakdown of the ene product, probably heterolytically.Rate constans for diene reaction were determined in acetonitrile-d3 and p-dioxane-d8.Adducts were isolated in three cases and rate constants for adduct breakdown determined for isolated compounds.Where the adduct could be observed but not isolated, a constant was calculated through computer simulation of the rate data.The minor mechanism competing with the ene addition displayed not detectable intermediates and seemed most consistent with electron-proton-electron-proton or electron-proton-hydrogen-atom transfer.Total reaction rate varied by a factor of over 4 * 105, yet with one exception, the ratio of the two pathways varied very little.One possible explaonation for this, the presence of a common rate determining step preceding any hydrogen transfer (such as SET) was ruled out by the finding of a large primary isotope effect for hexadeuterio-1,4-cyclohexadiene disappearance (kH/kD = 5.2).With one diene, 3,3-dimethyl-1,4-cyclohexadiene, the otherwise minor mechanism became the sole one, as the adduct formed was clearly not a concerted ene adduct.However, in this case aromatization also required a 1,2 methyl shift, and the fact that quantitative collapse to an adduct, without rearrangement, occured instead ruled out a simple cation intermediate from hydride transfer.A reversible electron transfer therefore seems the likeliest first step for the minor mechanism.

Post a RFQ

Enter 15 to 2000 letters.Word count: 0 letters

Attach files(File Format: Jpeg, Jpg, Gif, Png, PDF, PPT, Zip, Rar,Word or Excel Maximum File Size: 3MB)

1 Customer Service

What can I do for you?
Get Best Price

Get Best Price for 114693-82-2