Welcome to LookChem.com Sign In|Join Free

CAS

  • or

1258700-43-4

Post Buying Request

1258700-43-4 Suppliers

Recommended suppliersmore

  • Product
  • FOB Price
  • Min.Order
  • Supply Ability
  • Supplier
  • Contact Supplier

1258700-43-4 Usage

Check Digit Verification of cas no

The CAS Registry Mumber 1258700-43-4 includes 10 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 7 digits, 1,2,5,8,7,0 and 0 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 4 and 3 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 1258700-43:
(9*1)+(8*2)+(7*5)+(6*8)+(5*7)+(4*0)+(3*0)+(2*4)+(1*3)=154
154 % 10 = 4
So 1258700-43-4 is a valid CAS Registry Number.

1258700-43-4Downstream Products

1258700-43-4Relevant articles and documents

Screening for in vitro antimycobacterial activity and three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) study of 4-(arylamino)coumarin derivatives

Virsdoia, Vijay,Shaikh, Mushtaque S.,Manvar, Atul,Desai, Bhavik,Parecha, Alpesh,Loriya, Raju,Dholariya, Kinnari,Patel, Gautam,Vora, Vipul,Upadhyay, Kuldip,Denish, Karia,Shah, Anamik,Coutinho, Evans C.

experimental part, p. 412 - 424 (2012/07/28)

The resurgence of tuberculosis and the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains of Mycobacteria necessitate the search for new classes of antimycobacterial agents. We have synthesized a small library of 50 analogues of 4-(arylamino)coumarins with various aromatic amines at the C4-position of the coumarin scaffold. The compounds were evaluated for antimycobacterial activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv with rifampicin as the standard. Of the molecules synthesized, compound 9 was found to be most potent with a minimum inhibitory concentration >6.25 lg/mL for 100% inhibition. In an effort to develop new and more effective molecules in this series, the relationship between structure and activity was investigated by comparative molecular field analysis. Various models were generated using comparative molecular field analysis alone and comparative molecular field analysis plus a hydropathy field (HINT). In all, eight models were generated with atom-fit and field-fit alignment strategies. The comparative molecular field analysis models (Models 3a and 4a) based on field-fit alignment were the best with statistically good correlation coefficients (r2) and cross-validated q2. The values of r2pred for the validation set were 0.469 and 0.516. Based on the comparative molecular field analysis contours, some insights into the structure-activity relationship of the compounds could be gained.

Post a RFQ

Enter 15 to 2000 letters.Word count: 0 letters

Attach files(File Format: Jpeg, Jpg, Gif, Png, PDF, PPT, Zip, Rar,Word or Excel Maximum File Size: 3MB)

1

What can I do for you?
Get Best Price

Get Best Price for 1258700-43-4