149609-33-6Relevant academic research and scientific papers
Rat hepatic microsomal aldehyde dehydrogenase. Identification of 3- and 4-substituted aromatic aldehydes as substrates of the enzyme
Martini, Robert,Murray, Michael
, p. 268 - 276 (1996)
The rat hepatic microsomal aldehyde dehydrogenase (mALDH) metabolizes aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes to the corresponding acids with NAD as the optimal cofactor. However, dehydrogenation of the aliphatic compounds is substantially more efficient. In the present study, a series of aromatic aldehydes was evaluated as substrates of the purified mALDH so that the physicochemical factors that contribute to substrate affinity could be evaluated. Substitution of the aromatic system in the 3- and 4-positions produced relatively good substrates, but 2-substituted congeners did not undergo dehydrogenation. However, aldehydes with hydrophilic substituents in the 3- or 4-positions and those with extremely bulky substituents at both positions (e.g., 3,4-dibenzyloxy) were also poor substrates for the enzyme and dehydrogenation was undetectable. A quantitative structure-activity relationship was determined that related the logarithm of the Michaelis constants for 27 substituted aromatic aldehydes with the zero-order connectivity function of the molecule (0χ), the shapes of the 3-and 4-substituents (κ), and the electronic nature of the 4-substituent (σ). In this equation, 81% of the data variance was explained. From a consideration of the dimensions of 3-phenoxybenzaldehyde, which was a relatively good substrate, the mALDH possesses a narrow cleft within the active site that is at least 7.5 A wide and extends at least 12 A from the the catalytic residue (probably cysteine). Previously established relationships between connectivity functions and molecular polarizability suggest that dipolar interactions within the active site, as well as dispersion forces, may play a role in substrate specificity. Although optimal shapes for carbocyclic substituents were not provided by the analysis, the unfavorable effect on dehydrogenation from hydrophilic and large substituents suggests that the active site of the mALDH is relatively rigid and that the orientation of the substrate in relation to the catalytic cysteine and the cofactor binding site is critical.
