155145-20-3Relevant articles and documents
Studies of iron(III) porphyrinates containing silanethiolate ligands
Meininger, Daniel J.,Caranto, Jonathan D.,Arman, Hadi D.,Tonzetich, Zachary J.
, p. 12468 - 12476 (2013)
The chemistry of several iron(III) porphyrinates containing silanethiolate ligands is described. The complexes are prepared by protonolysis reactions of silanethiols with the iron(III) precursors, [Fe(OMe)(TPP)] and [Fe(OH)(H 2O)(TMP)] (TPP = dianion of meso-tetraphenylporphine; TMP = dianion of meso-tetramesitylporphine). Each of the compounds has been fully characterized in solution and the solid state. The stability of the silanethiolate complexes versus other iron(III) porphyrinate complexes containing sulfur-based ligands allows for an examination of their reactivity with several biologically relevant small molecules including H2S, NO, and 1-methylimidazole. Electrochemically, the silanethiolate complexes display a quasi-reversible one-electron oxidation event at potentials higher than that observed for an analogous arenethiolate complex. The behavior of these complexes versus other sulfur-ligated iron(III) porphyrinates is discussed.
One-electron oxidized product of difluoroiron(iii) porphyrin: Is it iron(iv) porphyrin or iron(iii) porphyrin π-cation radical?
Ikezaki, Akira,Takahashi, Masashi,Nakamura, Mikio
body text, p. 9163 - 9168 (2011/10/17)
The electronic structure of [Fe(TMP)F2], which is formally a one-electron oxidation equivalent above [FeIII(TMP)F 2]-, has been examined in solution by 1H NMR, UV-Vis, and Moessbauer spectroscopy. In CD2Cl2-CD 3OD solution at 193 K, the pyrrole-H and m-H signals appeared at 128.2 and 116.7 ppm, respectively. The UV-Vis spectrum showed broad absorption bands at 560-680 nm. The Moessbauer spectrum taken in frozen toluene-methanol solution exhibited a very broad single line from which the IS and QS values were determined by computer simulation to be 0.50 and 0.14 mm s-1, respectively. On the basis of these results, it was concluded that the one-electron oxidized product of [Fe(TMP)F2]- should be formulated as the iron(iii) radical cation [FeIII(TMP) F2], not as iron(iv) porphyrin [FeIV(TMP)F2] as previously suggested.