Welcome to LookChem.com Sign In|Join Free

CAS

  • or

167391-17-5

Post Buying Request

167391-17-5 Suppliers

Recommended suppliersmore

  • Product
  • FOB Price
  • Min.Order
  • Supply Ability
  • Supplier
  • Contact Supplier

167391-17-5 Usage

Check Digit Verification of cas no

The CAS Registry Mumber 167391-17-5 includes 9 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 6 digits, 1,6,7,3,9 and 1 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 1 and 7 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 167391-17:
(8*1)+(7*6)+(6*7)+(5*3)+(4*9)+(3*1)+(2*1)+(1*7)=155
155 % 10 = 5
So 167391-17-5 is a valid CAS Registry Number.

167391-17-5Downstream Products

167391-17-5Relevant articles and documents

Use of 1,3-dioxin-4-ones and related compounds in synthesis. 46. 2-(l-menthyloxycarbonyl)-2,6-dimethyl-1,3-dioxin-4-one and related compounds. Relationship between facial selectivity and pyramidalization

Sato, Masayuki,Murakami, Masayuki,Sunami, Satoshi,Kaneko, Chikara,Furuya, Toshio,Kurihara, Hiroyuki

, p. 4279 - 4287 (1995)

Preparation and ground-state reactions (conjugate addition and catalytic hydrogenation) of a 1,3-dioxin-4-one having an l-menthyloxycarbonyl group at the 2-position as the only substituent (7a) and its 6-methyl derivative (8a), as well as their 2-methyl derivatives (5a and 6a), are reported. The X-ray structure of the 2-(methoxycarbonyl)-2-phenyl derivative (4b) was also determined. The result, when combined with previously reported X-ray crystallographic analyses on related dioxinones, suggests that all of the dioxinones take a sofa conformation of the six-membered ring, whose top face is always on the same side as the pyramidalization of the enone function in the ring. Conjugate addition reaction of Sa leads to exclusive addition on the bottom face, while addition to 7a gives the product corresponding to the top face addition. Catalytic hydrogenation of 6a and 8a is also reported. Though the selectivity is much lowered as compared with the conjugate addition, the same facial selectivities are again observed. A comparison with the exclusive top face attack on 2-tert-butyl-1,3-dioxin-4-one (1) and its 2-methyl derivative 2 and bottom face attack on 2-(l-menthyloxycarbonyl)-2-phenyl-1,3-dioxin-4-one (3a) makes it clear that the prediction of facial selectivity in these ground-state reactions (conjugate addition and catalytic hydrogenation) based on pyramidalization is not always correct. A novel hypothesis which accounts for all of the above results (sofa conformation of the hetero ring, pyramidalization at the enone portion, and facial selectivity) is presented.

Post a RFQ

Enter 15 to 2000 letters.Word count: 0 letters

Attach files(File Format: Jpeg, Jpg, Gif, Png, PDF, PPT, Zip, Rar,Word or Excel Maximum File Size: 3MB)

1

What can I do for you?
Get Best Price

Get Best Price for 167391-17-5