Welcome to LookChem.com Sign In|Join Free
  • or
Rh(C30H36NP2Si2)(P(C4H4N)3) is a chemical with a specific purpose. Lookchem provides you with multiple data and supplier information of this chemical.

213326-92-2

Post Buying Request

213326-92-2 Suppliers

Recommended suppliers

  • Product
  • FOB Price
  • Min.Order
  • Supply Ability
  • Supplier
  • Contact Supplier

213326-92-2 Usage

Check Digit Verification of cas no

The CAS Registry Mumber 213326-92-2 includes 9 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 6 digits, 2,1,3,3,2 and 6 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 9 and 2 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 213326-92:
(8*2)+(7*1)+(6*3)+(5*3)+(4*2)+(3*6)+(2*9)+(1*2)=102
102 % 10 = 2
So 213326-92-2 is a valid CAS Registry Number.

213326-92-2Downstream Products

213326-92-2Relevant academic research and scientific papers

Thermodynamics of phosphine coordination to the [PNP]Rh(I) fragment: An example of the importance of reorganization energies in the assessment of metal-ligand 'bond strengths'

Huang, Jinkun,Haar, Christopher M.,Nolan, Steven P.,Marshall, William J.,Motoy, Kenneth G.

, p. 7806 - 7815 (2007/10/03)

Reaction enthalpies of the complexes [RPNP]Rh(COE) ([RPNP] = N(SiMe2CH2PPh2)2, N(SiMe2-CH2P(i)Pr2)2; COE = cyclooctene) with a series of phosphine ligands and CO have been measured by solution calorimetry. The measured enthalpies span a range of ca. 40 kcal/mol. These systems favor coordination of strong π-acceptor/weak σ-donor ligands as shown by the trend in ΔH(rxn): CO >> Ppyrl'3 > Ppyrl3 > PPhpyrl2 > PPh2pyrl > PPh3. This trend is exactly the opposite of that observed in another square planar rhodium(I) system, trans-RhCl(CO)(PZ3)2. With the exception of CO, the ligands investigated are isosteric, and so the observed trends are electronic in nature. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies on several of theses complexes ([RPNP]RhL where R, L = Ph, PPh3; Ph, Ppyrl3; Ph, CO; (i)Pr, PPh3; (i)Pr, Ppyrl3; (i)Pr, CO; (i)Pr, COE) have been performed. Although the structural trends are readily understood in terms of the electronic (donor/acceptor) nature of each ligand array, it is not obvious that the structural data predict the trends or, in particular, the trend reversal in ΔH(rxn) in the two Rh(I) systems. Rather, these results illustrate the importance of reorganization energies in thermodynamic analyses of metal-ligand bonding, especially in the presence of synergistic bonding involving σ-donor, π-donor, and π-acceptor ligands, interacting through shared metal orbitals (electron push-pull). In such cases the interpretation of a metal-ligand bond dissociation enthalpy (D) as an intrinsic, universal, and transferable property of that bond (e.g., a 'bond strength') is an invalid proposition.

Post a RFQ

Enter 15 to 2000 letters.Word count: 0 letters

Attach files(File Format: Jpeg, Jpg, Gif, Png, PDF, PPT, Zip, Rar,Word or Excel Maximum File Size: 3MB)

1 Customer Service

What can I do for you?
Get Best Price

Get Best Price for 213326-92-2