Welcome to LookChem.com Sign In|Join Free
  • or
bis(N,N-di-n-butyldithiocarbamato)mercury(II) is a chemical with a specific purpose. Lookchem provides you with multiple data and supplier information of this chemical.

21439-58-7

Post Buying Request

21439-58-7 Suppliers

Recommended suppliers

  • Product
  • FOB Price
  • Min.Order
  • Supply Ability
  • Supplier
  • Contact Supplier

21439-58-7 Usage

Check Digit Verification of cas no

The CAS Registry Mumber 21439-58-7 includes 8 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 5 digits, 2,1,4,3 and 9 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 5 and 8 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 21439-58:
(7*2)+(6*1)+(5*4)+(4*3)+(3*9)+(2*5)+(1*8)=97
97 % 10 = 7
So 21439-58-7 is a valid CAS Registry Number.

21439-58-7Downstream Products

21439-58-7Relevant academic research and scientific papers

Syntheses, crystal and molecular structures, and properties of some new phenylmercury(ii) dithiolate complexes

Singh, Nanhai,Kumar, Abhinav,Molloy, Kieran C.,Mahon, Mary F.

, p. 4999 - 5007 (2009/02/05)

A series of new phenylmercury(ii) dithio complexes [PhHg(Bu n2dtc)] (1; Bun2dtc- = di-n-butyldithiocarbamate), [PhHg(morphdtc)] (2; morphdtc- = morpholinedithiocarbamate), [PhHg(Bz2dtc)] (3; Bz2dtc - = dibenzyldithiocarbamate), [PhHg(methoxethxant)] (4; methoxethxant- = 2-methoxyethylxanthate) [(PhHg)2NED] (5; NED2- = 1-nitroethylene-2,2-dithiolate) and [(PhHg)2CDC] (6; CDC2- = cyanodithioimidocarbonate) have been prepared and characterized by elemental analysis, UV-Vis, IR, 1H and 13C NMR spectra and mass spectrometry. The crystal structures of 1, 2 and 3 showed a linear Hg(ii) core at the center of the molecules. The weak intra- and intermolecular Hg-S interactions provide a molecular chain framework. The reaction of PhHgO2CCH3 with Bu n2dtcH gave the known dimeric complex Hg(Bu n2dtc)2 while the Ni(O2CCH 3)2 mediated reaction gave 1 instead of the expected heterobimetallic complex [PhHgNi(Bun2CS2) 2]O2CCH3 which has been corroborated by natural charges at each atom obtained at the density functional level (DFT) of theory. Upon excitation at 358 nm 3 exhibited a medium strong photoluminescence emission at 420 nm as a consequence of intraligand π → π* transitions. The electronic absorption bands of 3 were assigned from time dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) calculations. Geometrical configurations of 4, 5 and 6 have been optimized using the DFT method. All of the complexes are weakly conducting (σrt ~ 10-12 S cm-1). However 2 and 6 exhibited semiconductivity with band gaps of 0.39 and 0.94 eV respectively. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008.

Electrochemical reduction and oxidation of cobalt(III) dithiocarbamates

Bond,Hendrickson,Martin,Moir,Page

, p. 3440 - 3446 (2008/10/08)

The literature describing the oxidation and reduction of cobalt(III) dithiocarbamate complexes, Co(R2dtc)3, and the chemistry of formally cobalt(II) and cobalt(IV) dithiocarbamate complexes contains substantially conflicting data. An extensive investigation of the electrochemical reduction and oxidation of Co(R2dtc)3 leads to the following conclusions: (i) In CH2Cl2 and for R = cyclohexyl, controlled-potential oxidative electrolysis at platinum electrodes produces a complex that appears to be the elusive cobalt(IV) complex [Co(R2dtc)3]+ (or possibly [Co2(R2dtc)6]2+ or related species). In acetone, electrolysis of the cyclohexyl derivative at platinum electrodes produces the cobalt(III) dimer [Co2(R2dtc)5]+. At mercury electrodes, the oxidation process proceeds via a pathway different from that at platinum electrodes and [Co2(R2dtc)5]+ and mercury dithiocarbamate complexes are obtained as products. (ii) On the electrochemical time scale, oxidation of most Co(R2dtc)3 complexes is chemically reversible in CH2Cl2 but not always in acetone or acetonitrile, implying that [Co(R2dtc)3]+ has a finite stability for many complexes, at least in CH2Cl2. However, with the exception of R = cyclohexyl, noted above, this complex is not obtained from electrolysis experiments. While [Co2(R2dtc)5]+ rather than [Co(R2dtc)3]+ may be isolated from the oxidized solution in CH2Cl2, it is not formed at the electrode surface and results from a series of chemical reactions subsequent to electron transfer. (iii) Electrochemical reduction of Co(R2dtc)3 is extremely complex and depends markedly on the nature of the R group, solvent, and electrode. Formation of [Co(R2dtc)3]- is favored by solvents such as acetone or acetonitrile and is stabilized by adsorption on mercury electrodes. Thus, chemically reversible one-electron reduction steps are observed in some circumstances. By contrast, Co(R2dtc)2 appears to be significantly more stable in CH2Cl2 than [Co(R2dtc)3]-, and chemically irreversible reduction is generally associated with this solvent at platinum electrodes. The nature of further electrochemical reduction steps, which ultimately produce cobalt metal and dissociated ligands, also depends on numerous variables.

Post a RFQ

Enter 15 to 2000 letters.Word count: 0 letters

Attach files(File Format: Jpeg, Jpg, Gif, Png, PDF, PPT, Zip, Rar,Word or Excel Maximum File Size: 3MB)

1 Customer Service

What can I do for you?
Get Best Price

Get Best Price for 21439-58-7