247129-98-2Relevant academic research and scientific papers
14-Electron four-coordinate Ru(II) carbyl complexes and their five-coordinate precursors: Synthesis, double agostic interactions, and reactivity
Huang, Dejian,Streib, William E.,Bollinger, John C.,Caulton, Kenneth G.,Winter, Rainer F.,Scheiring, Thomas
, p. 8087 - 8097 (2007/10/03)
The structure of five-coordinate Ru(II) complexes RuHCl(CO)(PiPr3)2,1, RuCl2(CO)(PiPr3)2, 2, and Ru(Ph)Cl(CO)(PtBu2Me)2, 12, are reported. All three of these complexes have square-based pyramid geometry with the strongest σ-donor ligand trans to the vacant site. These 16-electron complexes do not show bona fide agostic interactions. This is attributed to the strong trans influence ligand (H, CO, and Ph) and π-donation of the Cl, which is further supported by the fact that two agostic interactions are present in the Cl- removal product of 12, i.e., the four-coordinate [RuPh(CO)L2]BAr′4 (L = PtBu2Me, Ar′ = 3,5-C6H3(CF3)2), 16. Structural comparison of 16 and 12 reveals that removal of Cl- does not change the remaining ligand arrangements but creates two low-lying LUMOs for agostic interactions, which persist in solution as evidenced by IR spectroscopy. Reactions of 16 with E-H (E = B, C(sp)) bonds cleave the Ru-Ph bond and form Ru-E/H bonds by different mechanisms. The reaction with catecholborane gives [RuH(CO)L2]BAr′4, which further reacts with catecholborane to give [Ru(BR2)(CO)L2]BAr′4. However, the reaction with Me3SiCCH undergoes a multistep transformation to give a PhCCSiMe3- and Me3SiCCH-coupled product, the mechanism of which is discussed. Reaction of RuCl2(CO)L2 with 1 equiv MeLi affords RuMeCl(CO)L2, 5, which further reacts with MeLi forming RuMe2(CO)L2, 7. Variable-temperature 13C{1H} NMR spectra reveal the two methyls in 7 are inequivalent and exchange by overcoming an energy barrier of 6.8 kcal/mol at -30 °C. The chloride of 5 can be removed to give [RuMe(CO)L2]BAr′4.
[Ru(Ph)(CO)(PtBu2Me)2]+: A unique 14-electron Ru(II) complex with two agostic interactions
Huang,Streib,Eisenstein,Caulton
, p. 2004 - 2006 (2007/10/03)
A nonplanar arrangement of four ligands is intrinsic to the title compound in solution and in the crystal. There is no interaction between the Ru center and the counterion [3,5-(CF3)2C6H3]4B-. Density functional theory calculations of the model complex [Ru(Ph)(CO)(PH3)2]+ provided the structure shown on the right, which shows no ortho-CH···Ru interaction.
