Welcome to LookChem.com Sign In|Join Free

CAS

  • or

530-54-1

Post Buying Request

530-54-1 Suppliers

Recommended suppliersmore

This product is a nationally controlled contraband, and the Lookchem platform doesn't provide relevant sales information.

530-54-1 Usage

Check Digit Verification of cas no

The CAS Registry Mumber 530-54-1 includes 6 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 3 digits, 5,3 and 0 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 5 and 4 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 530-54:
(5*5)+(4*3)+(3*0)+(2*5)+(1*4)=51
51 % 10 = 1
So 530-54-1 is a valid CAS Registry Number.
InChI:InChI=1/C11H15NO2/c1-8(12-2)11(13)9-4-6-10(14-3)7-5-9/h4-8,12H,1-3H3

530-54-1SDS

SAFETY DATA SHEETS

According to Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) - Sixth revised edition

Version: 1.0

Creation Date: Aug 19, 2017

Revision Date: Aug 19, 2017

1.Identification

1.1 GHS Product identifier

Product name 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-(methylamino)propan-1-one

1.2 Other means of identification

Product number -
Other names Methoxifedrina

1.3 Recommended use of the chemical and restrictions on use

Identified uses For industry use only.
Uses advised against no data available

1.4 Supplier's details

1.5 Emergency phone number

Emergency phone number -
Service hours Monday to Friday, 9am-5pm (Standard time zone: UTC/GMT +8 hours).

More Details:530-54-1 SDS

530-54-1Relevant articles and documents

Novel benzene-based carbamates for ache/bche inhibition: Synthesis and ligand/structure-oriented sar study

Bak, Andrzej,Kozik, Violetta,Kozakiewicz, Dariusz,Gajcy, Kamila,Strub, Daniel Jan,Swietlicka, Aleksandra,Stepankova, Sarka,Imramovsky, Ales,Polanski, Jaroslaw,Smolinski, Adam,Jampilek, Josef

, (2019/05/10)

A series of new benzene-based derivatives was designed, synthesized and comprehensively characterized. All of the tested compounds were evaluated for their in vitro ability to potentially inhibit the acetyl-and butyrylcholinesterase enzymes. The selectivity index of individual molecules to cholinesterases was also determined. Generally, the inhibitory potency was stronger against butyryl-compared to acetylcholinesterase; however, some of the compounds showed a promising inhibition of both enzymes. In fact, two compounds (23, benzyl ethyl(1-oxo-1-phenylpropan-2-yl)carbamate and 28, benzyl (1-(3-chlorophenyl)-1-oxopropan-2-yl) (methyl)carbamate) had a very high selectivity index, while the second one (28) reached the lowest inhibitory concentration IC50 value, which corresponds quite well with galanthamine. Moreover, comparative receptor-independent and receptor-dependent structure–activity studies were conducted to explain the observed variations in inhibiting the potential of the investigated carbamate series. The principal objective of the ligand-based study was to comparatively analyze the molecular surface to gain insight into the electronic and/or steric factors that govern the ability to inhibit enzyme activities. The spatial distribution of potentially important steric and electrostatic factors was determined using the probability-guided pharmacophore mapping procedure, which is based on the iterative variable elimination method. Additionally, planar and spatial maps of the host–target interactions were created for all of the active compounds and compared with the drug molecules using the docking methodology.