626229-89-8

Relevant academic research and scientific papers

The use of turbulent flow chromatography for rapid, on-line analysis of tryptic digests

Rationale Following digestion of proteins with trypsin, digests are typically subjected to further 'clean-up' prior to liquid chromatography/mass spectometry (LC/MS) analysis, in order to reduce the complexity of the digested matrix, as well as helping to remove residual denaturants and reduction/alkylation reagents prior to injection onto the analytical HPLC column. Often, this is carried out using off-line techniques, and is not ideally suited to high-throughput workloads, for example in clinical laboratories. Methods Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as a model protein. Following denaturation with urea, reduction/alkylation, and digestion with trypsin, the analytical recovery of a selection of proteotypic BSA peptides was assessed using a two-dimensional, turbulent flow chromatography method. Peptides were identified using a Q Exactive mass spectometer operating in full-scan mode. Results Total analysis time (including the on-line sample clean-up) was 15 min per injection. Aside from the most hydrophilic peptide selected, ATEEQLK, recovery using the turbulent flow chromatography systems was greater than 30% for all remaining peptides (N=17), and exceeded 50% for 12 of the 18 peptides studied. There was a broad correlation between the hydrophobicity factor and the observed recovery. Conclusions This study suggests that turbulent flow chromatography offers a rapid, on-line alternative to solid-phase extraction for the analysis of peptide digests by LC/MS. A wide range of column chemistries are available, and the technique can be further optimised for analyses which are targetted to specific peptides. As with turbulent flow chromatography for small-molecule workflows, this approach may be ideally suited to high-throughput applications, such as those which are emerging from within clinical laboratories.

Guanidinated protein internal standard for immunoaffinity-liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry quantitation of protein therapeutics

RATIONALEA protein internal standard (IS) is essential and superior to a peptide IS to achieve reproducible results in the quantitation of protein therapeutics using immunoaffinity-liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Guanidination has been used as a protein post-modification technique for more than half a century. A decade ago, the modification was applied to lysine-ending peptides to enhance their MALDI responses and peptide sequencing coverage. However, rarely has tryptic digestion of guanidinated proteins been investigated, likely due to the early conclusion that trypsin did not hydrolyze peptide bonds involving homoarginine in guanidinated proteins. In this study, the opposite was observed. Guanidinated lysine residues of proteins did not hinder the access of trypsin allowing for proteolytic digestion. Based on this observation, a new concept of internal standard, named Guanidinated Protein Internal Standard (GP-IS), was proposed for LC/MS/MS quantitation of protein therapeutics. METHODSThe GP-IS is prepared by treating a portion of the therapeutic protein (analyte) with guanidine to convert arginine residues in the protein into homoarginine residues. After tryptic digestion, the GP-IS produces a series of homoarginine-ending peptides plus another series of arginine-ending peptides. One of the homoarginine-ending peptides, which corresponds to the analyte surrogate (lysine-ending) peptide, was chosen as a peptide internal standard (GP-PIS) for LC/MS/MS quantitation. RESULTSUsing this GP-IS approach, a sensitive and robust immunoaffinity-LC/MS/MS assay was developed and fully validated with a linearity range from 10 to 1000 ng/mL using 200 μL of human serum for the quantitation of an Astellas protein drug in clinical development. CONCLUSIONSThe proposed strategy allows LC/MS/MS to play an ever-increasing role in bioanalytical support for protein therapeutics development because of its capability of completely tracking all variations from the beginning to the end of sample analysis, easier preparation compared to isotope-labeled protein-IS, and greater flexibility for changing to alternate analyte surrogate peptides. Copyright