75032-29-0Relevant academic research and scientific papers
Synthesis of thioether andrographolide derivatives and their inhibitory effect against cancer cells
Liu, Yi,Liang, Ren-Ming,Ma, Qing-Ping,Xu, Kai,Liang, Xin-Yong,Huang, Wei,Sutton, Robert,Ding, Jie,O'Neil, Paul M.,Cheng, Chun-Ru
, p. 1268 - 1274 (2017/07/07)
A series of novel thioether andrographolide derivatives were synthesized by incorporating various aromatic (or heteroaromatic) substituents into C-12 or 14-OH. A total of 38 andrographolide derivatives were prepared and evaluated for their in vitro inhibi
6-AMINO-PYRIMIDINE-4-CARBOXAMIDE DERIVATIVES AND RELATED COMPOUNDS WHICH BIND TO THE SPHINGOSINE 1-PHOSPHATE (S1P) RECEPTOR FOR THE TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
-
Page/Page column 130-131, (2009/04/25)
The invention relates to compounds of formula (I): wherein X, W, Q, R, R1 and R2 have the meanings given in claim 1. The compounds are useful e.g. in the treatment of autoimmune disorders, such as multiple sclerosis.
Neighboring-Group Participation by Hydroxyl Oxygen in Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution. Smiles Rearrangements of (ω-Hydroxyalkyl)methyl(p-nitrophenyl)sulfonium Perchlorates in Aqueous Alkali
Irie, Tadashi,Tanida, Hiroshi
, p. 4961 - 4965 (2007/10/02)
(2-Hydroxyethyl)- (1), (3-hydroxy-n-propyl)- (2), and (4-hydroxy-n-butyl)methyl(p-nitrophenyl)sulfonium perchlorates (3) were prepared.Products by Smiles rearrangements (intramolecular SNAr reactions) were obtained from 1 as β-(methylthio)ethyl p-nitrophenyl ether (9) in 37-42percent yield and from 2 as γ-(methylthio)propyl p-nitrophenyl ether (8) in quantitative yields, and none were obtained from 3.The rearrangement rates and yields were compared with an intermolecular SN2 reaction of dimethyl(p-nitrophenyl)sulfonium perchlorate (4) (displacement of the sulfonium group by a n-propoxy group) to estimate participation by the ω-hydroxyl oxygen.The rate ratios between the rearrangements (first order) and the SN2 n-propoxy attack (second order), effective molarities, were obtained as 6.02 * 103 M for 1 vs. 4 and 4.64 * 103 M for 2 vs. 4.
