Welcome to LookChem.com Sign In|Join Free

CAS

  • or
(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)dihydro(η2-dihydrogen)(tricyclohexylphosphine)osmium(IV) tetrafluoroborate is a chemical with a specific purpose. Lookchem provides you with multiple data and supplier information of this chemical.

869881-69-6

Post Buying Request

869881-69-6 Suppliers

Recommended suppliersmore

  • Product
  • FOB Price
  • Min.Order
  • Supply Ability
  • Supplier
  • Contact Supplier

869881-69-6 Usage

Check Digit Verification of cas no

The CAS Registry Mumber 869881-69-6 includes 9 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 6 digits, 8,6,9,8,8 and 1 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 6 and 9 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 869881-69:
(8*8)+(7*6)+(6*9)+(5*8)+(4*8)+(3*1)+(2*6)+(1*9)=256
256 % 10 = 6
So 869881-69-6 is a valid CAS Registry Number.

869881-69-6Downstream Products

869881-69-6Relevant articles and documents

Synthesis and NMR studies of [(C5Me5)Os(L)H 2(H2)+] complexes. Evidence of the adoption of different structures by a dihydrogen complex in solution and the solid state

Gross, Christopher L.,Girolami, Gregory S.

, p. 1658 - 1664 (2007)

Protonation of the osmium(IV) trihydrides (C5Me 5)OsH3(L) with HBF4 in diethyl ether affords the molecular dihydrogen complexes [(C5Me5)Os(H 2)H2(L)][BF4], where L is PPh3 (1), AsPh3 (2), or PCy3 (3). Ruthenium analogues of these species are not stable and instead lose H2 readily. These compounds adopt four-legged piano-stool geometries in which the phosphine ligand is trans to an elongated dihydrogen ligand. For 1 and 2, the coordinated H2 ligand is oriented with its H-H vector nearly parallel with the Os-Ct vector, where Ct is the centroid of the C5Me 5 ring; in contrast, in 3 the H2 ligand is oriented with its H-H vector perpendicular to the Os-Ct vector. In the 1H NMR spectra, exchange between the Os-H and Os-H2 environments can be slowed at low temperatures for the arsine complex 2 (but not for 1 or 3), and separate resonances could be observed for the hydride and dihydrogen sites; the barrier for exchange is approximately 6.0 kcal/mol. Partially deuterated samples were prepared, and H-H distances within the bound H2 ligands were deduced from the observed 1JHD(av) coupling constants. In addition, H-H distances were deduced from the T1(min) values for the osmium-bound hydrogen atoms, after correction for exchange and ligand-induced dipolar relaxation effects. In all cases, the two solution measurements were in agreement but differed from that deduced from neutron diffraction data. Specifically, for 1 the solution data gave a distance of ca. 1.07 vs 1.01 A in the solid state; similarly, for 2 the solution value of ca. 1.15 A was longer than the 1.08 A value seen in the solid state. In both cases, the ~0.06 A lengthening in solution, if real, is the result most likely of one or both of two factors: the effect of removing the BF 4 counterion from the vicinity of the cation and the effect of librational motion that tends to shorten artificially H-H distances deduced from neutron diffraction data. In contrast, for 3 the solution H-H distance of ca. 1.12 A is significantly shorter than the 1.31 A distance determined from the neutron diffraction data. DFT calculations support the hypothesis that different structures are adopted by 3 in solution and in the solid state and that in solution an equilibrium is established between two dihydrogen-dihydride structures, one with a considerably shorter H-H bond than is seen in the solid state.

Post a RFQ

Enter 15 to 2000 letters.Word count: 0 letters

Attach files(File Format: Jpeg, Jpg, Gif, Png, PDF, PPT, Zip, Rar,Word or Excel Maximum File Size: 3MB)

1

What can I do for you?
Get Best Price

Get Best Price for 869881-69-6