Welcome to LookChem.com Sign In|Join Free

CAS

  • or

92055-86-2

Post Buying Request

92055-86-2 Suppliers

Recommended suppliersmore

  • Product
  • FOB Price
  • Min.Order
  • Supply Ability
  • Supplier
  • Contact Supplier

92055-86-2 Usage

Check Digit Verification of cas no

The CAS Registry Mumber 92055-86-2 includes 8 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 5 digits, 9,2,0,5 and 5 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 8 and 6 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 92055-86:
(7*9)+(6*2)+(5*0)+(4*5)+(3*5)+(2*8)+(1*6)=132
132 % 10 = 2
So 92055-86-2 is a valid CAS Registry Number.

92055-86-2Downstream Products

92055-86-2Relevant articles and documents

Models of the Cytochromes b. 5. EPR Studies of Low-Spin Iron(III) Tetraphenylporphyrins

Walker, F. Ann,Reis, David,Balke, Virginia L.

, p. 6888 - 6898 (2007/10/02)

The EPR spectra of a wide range of tetraphenylporphyrin complexes of Fe(III) have been investigated as a function of solvent, ligand type, ligand basicity, porphyrin substituents, covalent attachment of axial ligands, and mixed axial ligand coordination.The results show the following: (1) EPR parameters of low-spin bis-axial ligand complexes of Fe(III) porphyrins depend not only on ligand basicity but also on ligand type.Of the three major classes studied, bis(imidazole) and -(aminopyridine) complexes all have similar values of gx, gy, and gz which are nearly independent of ligand basicity, while bis(pyrazole) (and bis(indazole)) complexes have gx, gy, and gz values which tend to converge as ligand basicity increases. (2) The effect of the electron-donating or -withdrawing nature of phenyl substituents on the EPR parameters of a large series of phenyl-substituted (TPP)Fe(N-MeIm)2+ derivatives is very small: The rhombicity V/Δ=0.64+/-0.01 for all complexes, while the tetragonality Δ/λ ranges from 2.97 for electron-donating substituents to 3.33 for electron-withdrawing substituents, the opposite trend from that expected for increasing axial ligand donor strength.No difference was observed in the EPR parameters of unsymmetrically as compared to symmetrically substituted TPP derivatives. (3) Covalent attachment of axial ligands or steric crowding of externally supplied axial ligands in the hope of seeing variation in the EPR parameters with relative axial ligand plane orientation (parallel vs. perpendicular) was not successful in producing pure isomers, and thus no effects on EPR parameters with axial ligand plane orientation were detected. (4) A covalently attached (N-alkylimidazole-TPP)Fe(III) derivative was utilized to allow formation of mixed-ligand low-spin Fe(III) complexes.The alkylimidazole-imidazolate ligand combination was only very slightly more tetragonal than its protonated imidazole counterpart, while the alkylimidazole-pyrazole, 3-aminopyrazole, 1,2,4-triazole, and 2-methylimidazole mixed ligand complexes all had EPR parameters uniquely different from those of the parent bis-ligand complexes.Discussion of these results in light of the g values of membrane-bound cytochromes b, c, and a3 bound to cyanide is also included.

Post a RFQ

Enter 15 to 2000 letters.Word count: 0 letters

Attach files(File Format: Jpeg, Jpg, Gif, Png, PDF, PPT, Zip, Rar,Word or Excel Maximum File Size: 3MB)

1

What can I do for you?
Get Best Price

Get Best Price for 92055-86-2