Welcome to LookChem.com Sign In|Join Free

CAS

  • or

107-21-1

Post Buying Request

107-21-1 Suppliers

Recommended suppliersmore

  • Product
  • FOB Price
  • Min.Order
  • Supply Ability
  • Supplier
  • Contact Supplier

107-21-1 Usage

Chemical Description

Different sources of media describe the Chemical Description of 107-21-1 differently. You can refer to the following data:
1. Ethylene glycol is a diol that is commonly used as a coolant in automotive and industrial applications.
2. Ethylene glycol is a colorless, odorless, and sweet-tasting liquid that is commonly used as a solvent and antifreeze.

Dihydric alcohol

Ethylene glycol is the simplest aliphatic dihydric alcohol with chemical properties of alcohols such as being capable of generating ether, ester, or being oxidized into acid or aldehyde as well as being condensed to form ether or being substituted by halogen. Its reaction with acyl chloride or acid anhydride generally forms di-esters. Under heating in the presence of catalyst (manganese dioxide, aluminum oxide, zinc oxide or sulfuric acid), it can be subject to intermolecular or intramolecular dehydration to form the cyclic ethylene acetals, which can react with nitric acid to generate glycol dinitrate (an explosive). Ethylene glycol is the raw material for production of polyester resins, alkyd resins and polyester fiber. It can also be used as the refrigerant agent for automobile and aircraft engines refrigerant. In 1980, the glycol amount used as refrigerant agent is equal to the amount consumption for producing polyester. In addition, it can also be used for synthesizing polymers such as polyester fibers. Ethylene glycol dinitrate, when used in combination with nitroglycerine can reduce the freezing point of explosives. Ethylene glycol can also be used as the raw material of pharmaceuticals and plastics and high-boiling solvents. Industry applied ethylene as a raw material with first converting it to ethylene oxide and then hydrolyzing to produce ethylene glycol. This product is of fire and explosion hazards. It is irritating to skin and mucous membrane with inhalation of vapors or skin absorption producing a narcotic effect on the central nervous as well as causing kidney damage. Rat, through oral administration, has a LD50 of 8540 mg/kg. The maximal allowable concentration in the workplace is 5 × 10-6. This information is edited by Xiongfeng Dai from lookchem.

Poisoning and first aid

This product is of low toxicity. Rat LD50: 5.5ml/kg~8.54ml/kg. People who is subject to oral administration by once has a LD50 of 80g~100g. The plasma concentration of ethylene glycol is 2.4g/L and can cause acute renal failure. It can be absorbed through the digestive tract, respiratory tract and skin. It can be discharged from the kidney in the form of prototype or ethanedioic acid (oxalate) from through oxidation. Glycol, after being oxidized into carbon dioxide, can be discharged from the respiratory tract. Although ethylene glycol has a high toxicity but its volatility is small. Therefore, it is unlikely that the inhalation of it during production can cause severe poisoning. Inhalation poisoning is manifested as blurred consciousness, nystagmus and urine containing protein, calcium oxalate crystals and red blood cells. Oral toxicity in clinical practice can be divided into three stages: the first stage is mainly the central nervous system symptoms, such as the performance of ethanol poisoning; the second phase of the main symptoms mainly include shortness of breath, cyanosis, and various manifestations of pulmonary edema or bronchopneumonia; at the third stage, there may be significant renal disease, low back pain, kidney area percussion pain, renal dysfunction, proteinuria, hematuria, urine containing calcium oxalate crystals, as well as oliguria, anuria and even acute renal failure. Patients mistakenly take it should be subject to the treatment based on the general principles of first aid for oral poisoning and can be given 600 mL of 1/6 mol of sodium lactate solution and 10 mL of 10% calcium gluconate through intravenous infusion. Patients of severe poisoning can subject to treatment of artificial kidney dialysis. Container of ethylene glycol should have "toxic agents" mark. The product, upon heating, should be sealed, vented to prevent inhalation of the vapor or aerosol. Avoid long-term direct skin contact with the product.

Chemical Properties

Different sources of media describe the Chemical Properties of 107-21-1 differently. You can refer to the following data:
1. It is colorless transparent viscous liquid with sweet taste and moisture absorption capability. It is also miscible with water, low-grade aliphatic alcohols, glycerol, acetic acid, acetone, ketones, aldehydes, pyridine and similar coal tar bases. It is slightly soluble in ether but almost insoluble in benzene and its homologues, chlorinated hydrocarbons, petroleum ether and oils.
2. Ethylene glycol,CH20HCH20H, also known as glycol,ethylene alcohol, glycol alcohol, and dihydric alcohol, is a colorless liquid. It is soluble in water and in alcohol. Ethyleneglycol has a low freezing point,-25°C (-13 OF), and is widely used as an antifreeze in automobiles and in hydraulic fluids. It is used as a solvent for nitrocellulose and in the manufacture of acrylonitrile, dynamites, and resins.
3. Ethylene glycol is a colorless, viscous, hydroscopic liquid with a sweetish taste. Often colored fluorescent yellow-green when used in automotive antifreeze. Ethylene glycol is odorless and does not provide any warning of inhalation exposure to hazardous concentrations. The Odor Threshold in air is 25 ppm.

Uses

Different sources of media describe the Uses of 107-21-1 differently. You can refer to the following data:
1. Glycol is mainly used as the antifreeze agent for preparation of the automobile cooling systems and the raw material for the production of polyethylene terephthalate (the raw material of polyester fibers and plastics material). It can also be used for the production of synthetic resins, solvents, lubricants, surfactants, emollients, moisturizers, explosives and so on. Glycol can often used as alternative of glycerol and can often be used as hydration agent and solvent in the tanning industry and pharmaceutical industry. Glycol has a strong dissolving capability but it is easily to be oxidized to toxic metabolic oxalic acid and therefore can’t be widely used as a solvent. The ethylene glycol can be supplemented to the hydraulic fluid and can be used for preventing the erosion of oil-based hydraulic fluid on the rubber of the system; the water-based hydraulic fluid with ethylene glycol as a main component is an inflammable hydraumatic fluid and can be applied to the molding machine in aircraft, automobiles and high-temperature operation. There are many important derivatives of ethylene glycol. Low molecular weight polyethylene glycol (mono-uret ethylene glycol, bi-uret ethylene glycol, tri-uret ethylene glycol or respectively called as diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, tetraethylene glycol) is actually the byproduct during the hydration of ethylene oxide B for preparation of ethylene glycol.
2. Ethylene glycol is used as an antifreeze inheating and cooling systems (e.g., automobileradiators and coolant for airplane motors).It is also used in the hydraulic brake fluids;as a solvent for paints, plastics, and inks; as a softening agent for cellophane; and in themanufacture of plasticizers, elastomers, alkydresins, and synthetic fibers and waxes.
3. Reagent typically used in cyclocondensation reactions with aldehydes1 and ketones1,2 to form 1,3-dioxolanes.
4. Antifreeze in cooling and heating systems. In hydraulic brake fluids and de-icing solutions. Industrial humectant. Ingredient of electrolytic condensers (where it serves as solvent for boric acid and borates). Solvent in the paint and plastics industries. In the formulation of printers' inks, stamp pad inks, ball-point pen ink. Softening agent for cellophane. Stabilizer for soybean foam used to extinguish oil and gasoline fires. In the synthesis of safety explosives, glyoxal, unsatd ester type alkyd resins, plasticizers, elastomers, synthetic fibers (Terylene, Dacron), and synthetic waxes. To create artificial smoke and mist for theatrical uses.

Production method

1. Direct hydration of ethylene oxide is currently the only way for industrial-scale production of ethylene glycol. Ethylene oxide and water, under pressure (2.23MPa) and 190-200 ℃ conditions, and can directly have liquid-phase hydration reaction in a tubular reactor to generate ethylene glycol while being with byproducts diethylene glycol, tripropylene ethylene gl]ycol and multi-uret poly ethylene glycol. The dilute ethylene glycol solution obtained from the reaction further undergoes thin film evaporator condensation, and then dehydration, refinement to obtain qualified products and by-products. 2. sulfuric acid catalyzed hydration of ethylene oxide; ethylene oxide can react with water, in the presence of sulfuric acid as the catalyst, at 60-80 ℃ and pressure of 9.806-19.61kPa for hydration to generate ethylene glycol. The reaction mixture can be neutralized by liquid alkaline and evaporated of the water to obtain 80% ethylene glycol, and then distilled and concentrated in distillation column to obtain over 98% of the finished product. This method is developed in early time. Owing to the presence of corrosion, pollution and product quality problems, together with complex refining process, countries have gradually discontinued and instead change to direct hydration. 3. Direct ethylene hydration; directly synthesize ethylene glycol from ethylene instead of being via ethylene oxide. 4. dichloroethane hydrolysis. 5. Formaldehyde method. Industrial preparation of ethylene glycol adopts chlorine ethanol method, ethylene oxide hydration and direct ethylene hydration with various methods having their characteristics, as described below. Chlorohydrin method Take chloroethanol as raw materials for hydrolysis in alkaline medium to obtain it. The reaction is carried out at 100 ℃. First generate ethylene oxide. Then pressurize at 1.01 MPa pressure to obtain ethylene glycol. Ethylene oxide hydration Hydration of ethylene oxide contains catalytic hydration and direct hydration. The hydration process can be carried out under either normal pressure or under compression. Normal pressure method generally take a small amount of inorganic acid as catalyst for reaction at 50~70 ℃. Pressurized hydration had a high demand for the molar ratio of ethylene oxide over water which is higher than 1:6, to reduce the side reaction of producing the ether with the reaction temperature being at 150 °C and the pressure being 147kPa with hydration generating ethylene glycol. There are currently gas phase catalytic hydration with silver oxide being the catalyst and the alumina oxide being the carrier for reaction at 150~240 ℃ to generate ethylene glycol. Direct hydration of ethylene Ethylene, in the presence of catalyst (e.g., antimony oxide TeO2 with palladium catalyst) can be oxidized in acetic acid solution to generate monoacetate ester or diacetate ester with further hydrolysis obtaining the ethylene glycol. The above several methods takes ethylene oxide hydration as good with simple process and is suitable for industrialization.

Category

Flammable liquid.

Toxicity grading

Poisoning.

Acute toxicity

Oral-rat LD50: 4700 mg/kg; Oral-Mouse LD50: 5500 mg/kg.

Irritation data

Skin-rabbit 555 mg Mild; Eyes-rabbit 500 mg/24 hr mild.

Hazardous characteristics of explosive

Being mixed with air can be explosive.

Flammability and hazard characteristics

It is combustible in case of fire, high temperature and strong oxidant with burning releasing smoke irritation.

Storage characteristics

Treasury: ventilation, low-temperature and dry.

Extinguishing agents

Foam, carbon dioxide, water spray, sand.

Professional standards

TWA 60 mg/m3; STEL 120 mg/m3.

Description

Ethylene glycol was first synthesized in 1859; however, it did not become a public health concern until after World War II. In fact, the first published series of deaths from ethylene glycol consumption involved 18 soldiers who drank antifreeze as a substitute for ethanol. Despite the early recognition that patients who drank ethanol in addition to ethylene glycol had prolonged survival when compared to those drinking ethylene glycol alone, antidotal treatment of ethylene glycol toxicity with ethanol was not evaluated until the 1960s. Today, ethylene glycol poisoning continues to be a public health problem, particularly in the southeastern United States. In 2009, US poison control centers received 5282 calls about possible ethylene glycol exposures, and the toxicology community believes these exposures are underreported.

Definition

ChEBI: A 1,2-glycol compound produced via reaction of ethylene oxide with water.

Production Methods

Historically, ethylene glycol has been manufactured by hydrolyzing ethylene oxide. Presently, it is also produced commercially by oxidizing ethylene in the presence of acetic acid to form ethylene diacetate, which is hydrolyzed to the glycol, and acetic acid is recycled in the process .

Preparation

Ethylene glycol is prepared by the hydration of ethylene oxide: This reaction is carried out in a manner comparable to that described for the preparation of propylene glycol from propylene oxide . Ethylene glycol is a colourless liquid, b.p. 197°C.

Reactions

Glycol reacts (1) with sodium to form sodium glycol, CH2OH · CH2ONa, and disodium glycol, CH2ONa·CH2ONa; (2) with phosphorus pentachloride to form ethylene dichloride, CH2Cl·CH2Cl (3) with carboxy acids to form mono- and disubstituted esters, e.g., glycol monoacetate, CH2OH·CH2OOCCH3, glycol diacetate, CH3COOCH2 · CH2OOCCH3; (4) with nitric acid (with sulfuric acid), to form glycol mononitrate, CH2OH·CH2ONO2, glycol dinitrate, CH2ONO2 · CH2ONO2; (5) with hydrogen chloride, heated, to form glycol chlorohydrin (ethylene chlorohydrin, CH2OH·CHCl); (6) upon regulated oxidation to form glycollic aldehyde, CH2OH·CHO, glyoxal, CHO · CHO, glycollic acid, CH2OH·COOH, glyoxalic acid, CHO·COOH, oxalic acid, COOH·COOH.

General Description

Ethylene glycol is a clear, colorless syrupy liquid. The primary hazard is the threat to the environment. Immediate steps should be taken to limit its spread to the environment. Since Ethylene glycol is a liquid Ethylene glycol can easily penetrate the soil and contaminate groundwater and nearby streams.

Reactivity Profile

Mixing Ethylene glycol in equal molar portions with any of the following substances in a closed container caused the temperature and pressure to increase: chlorosulfonic acid, oleum, sulfuric acid, [NFPA 1991].

Hazard

Questionable carcinogen. Toxic by ingestion and inhalation. Lethal dose reported to be 100 cc.

Health Hazard

Different sources of media describe the Health Hazard of 107-21-1 differently. You can refer to the following data:
1. Inhalation of vapor is not hazardous. Ingestion causes stupor or coma, sometimes leading to fatal kidney injury.
2. The acute inhalation toxicity of 1,2-ethanediolis low. This is due to its low vaporpressure, 0.06 torr at 20°C (68°F). Its saturationconcentration in air at 20°C (68°F)is 79 ppm and at 25°C (77°F) is 131 ppm(ACGIH 1986). Both concentrations exceedthe ACGIH ceiling limit in air, which is50 ppm. In humans, exposure to its mist orvapor may cause lacrimation, irritation ofthroat, and upper respiratory tract, headache,and a burning cough. These symptoms maybe manifested from chronic exposure toabout 100 ppm for 8 hours per day for severalweeks.The acute oral toxicity of 1,2-ethanediol islow to moderate. The poisoning effect, however,is much more severe from ingestionthan from inhalation. Accidental ingestion of80–120 mL of this sweet-tasting liquid canbe fatal to humans. The toxic symptoms inhumans may be excitement or stimulation,followed by depression of the central nervoussystem, nausea, vomiting, and drowsiness,which may, in the case of severe poisoning,progress to coma, respiratory failure, anddeath. When rats were administered sublethaldoses over a long period, there was depositionof calcium oxalate in tubules, causinguremic poisoning.LD50 value, oral (rats): 4700 mg/kgIngestion of 1,2-ethanediol produced reproductiveeffects in animals, causing fetotoxicity, postimplantation mortality, andspecific developmental abnormalities. Mutagenictests proved negative. It tested negativeto the histidine reversion–Ames test.

Fire Hazard

Ethylene glycol is combustible.

Flammability and Explosibility

Notclassified

Biochem/physiol Actions

Ethylene glycol is a low toxicity molecule and is used for embryo cryopreservation in many domestic animals.Ethylene glycol 5M solution is an additive screening solution of Additive Screening Kit. Additive Screen kit is designed to allow rapid and convenient evaluation of additives and their ability to influence the crystallization of the sample. The Additive Kit provides a tool for refining crystallization conditions.

Safety Profile

Human poison by ingestion. (Lethal dose for humans reported to be 100 mL.) Moderately toxic to humans by an unspecified route. Moderately toxic experimentally by ingestion, subcutaneous, intravenous, and intramuscular routes. Human systemic effects by ingestion and inhalation: eye lachrymation, general anesthesia, headache, cough, respiratory stimulation, nausea or vomiting, pulmonary, kidney, and liver changes. If ingested it causes initial central nervous system stimulation followed by depression. Later, it causes potentially lethal kidney damage. Very toxic in particulate form upon inhalation. An experimental teratogen. Other experimental reproductive effects. Human mutation data reported. A skin, eye, and mucous membrane irritant. Combustible when exposed to heat or flame; can react vigorously with oxidants. Moderate explosion hazard when exposed to flame. Iptes on contact with chromium trioxide, potassium permanganate, and sodium peroxide. Mixtures with ammonium dichromate, silver chlorate, sodium chlorite, and uranyl nitrate ipte when heated to 100°C. Can react violently with chlorosulfonic acid, oleum, H2SO4, HClO4, and Pass. Aqueous solutions may ignite silvered copper wires that have an applied D.C. voltage. To fight fire, use alcohol foam, water, foam, CO2, dry chemical. When heated to decomposition it emits acrid smoke and irritating fumes.

Potential Exposure

Ethylene glycol is used in antifreeze (especially as car radiator antifreeze) and in production of polyethylene terephthalate fibers and films; in hydraulic fluids; antifreeze and coolant mixtures for motor vehicles; electrolytic condensers; and heat exchangers. It is also used as a solvent and as a chemical intermediate for ethylene glycol dinitrate, glycol esters; resins, and for pharmaceuticals.

Environmental Fate

Ethylene glycol is considered an inert ingredient in pesticides. It typically enters the environment through waste streams after use of deicing products, where it is highly mobile in soil and contaminates groundwater. Ethylene glycol is considered ‘readily biodegradable.’ It biodegrades relatively quickly; its half-life (t1/2) is 2–12 days in soil. Ethylene glycol is biodegraded in water under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions within a day to a few weeks. In the atmosphere, ethylene glycol photochemically degrades with a t1/2 of approximately 2 days.

Shipping

UN3082 Environmentally hazardous substances, liquid, n.o.s., Hazard class: 9; Labels: 9-Miscellaneous hazardous material, Technical Name Required

Purification Methods

It is very hygroscopic, and also likely to contain higher diols. Dry it with CaO, CaSO4, MgSO4 or NaOH and distil it under vacuum. Dry further by reaction with sodium under nitrogen, reflux for several hours and distil. The distillate is then passed through a column of Linde type 4A molecular sieves and finally distil under nitrogen, from more molecular sieves. Then fractionally distil it. [Beilstein 1 IV 2369.]

Toxicity evaluation

Ethylene glycol has low toxicity but it is metabolized to a variety of toxic metabolites. Ethylene glycol and glycolaldehyde have an intoxicating effect on the central nervous system that can lead to ataxia, sedation, coma, and respiratory arrest similar to ethanol intoxication. However, the profound metabolic acidosis reported in toxicity is secondary to accumulation of acid metabolites, especially glycolic acid. The oxalic acid metabolite complexes with calcium and precipitates as calcium oxalate crystals in the renal tubules, leading to acute renal injury. Further, oxalate’s ability to chelate calcium may cause clinically relevant serum hypocalcemia.

Incompatibilities

Reacts with sulfuric acid, oleum, chlorosulfonic acid; strong oxidizing agents; strong bases; chromium trioxide; potassium permanganate; sodium peroxide. Hygroscopic (i.e., absorbs moisture from the air)

Waste Disposal

Dissolve or mix the material with a combustible solvent and burn in a chemical incinerator equipped with an afterburner and scrubber. All federal, state, and local environmental regulations must be observed. Alternatively, ethylene glycol can be recovered from polyester plant wastes

Check Digit Verification of cas no

The CAS Registry Mumber 107-21-1 includes 6 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 3 digits, 1,0 and 7 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 2 and 1 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 107-21:
(5*1)+(4*0)+(3*7)+(2*2)+(1*1)=31
31 % 10 = 1
So 107-21-1 is a valid CAS Registry Number.
InChI:InChI=1/C2H4.2H2O/c1-2;;/h1-2H2;2*1H2

107-21-1 Well-known Company Product Price

  • Brand
  • (Code)Product description
  • CAS number
  • Packaging
  • Price
  • Detail
  • TCI America

  • (E0105)  Ethylene Glycol  >99.5%(GC)

  • 107-21-1

  • 25g

  • 93.00CNY

  • Detail
  • TCI America

  • (E0105)  Ethylene Glycol  >99.5%(GC)

  • 107-21-1

  • 500g

  • 320.00CNY

  • Detail
  • Alfa Aesar

  • (44529)  Ethylene glycol, Spectrophotometric grade, 99+%   

  • 107-21-1

  • 1L

  • 666.0CNY

  • Detail
  • Alfa Aesar

  • (44529)  Ethylene glycol, Spectrophotometric grade, 99+%   

  • 107-21-1

  • *4x1L

  • 2376.0CNY

  • Detail
  • Alfa Aesar

  • (A11591)  Ethylene glycol, 99%   

  • 107-21-1

  • 250g

  • 189.0CNY

  • Detail
  • Alfa Aesar

  • (A11591)  Ethylene glycol, 99%   

  • 107-21-1

  • 500g

  • 237.0CNY

  • Detail
  • Alfa Aesar

  • (A11591)  Ethylene glycol, 99%   

  • 107-21-1

  • 2500g

  • 754.0CNY

  • Detail
  • Alfa Aesar

  • (A11591)  Ethylene glycol, 99%   

  • 107-21-1

  • 10000g

  • 1446.0CNY

  • Detail
  • Sigma-Aldrich

  • (324558)  Ethyleneglycol  anhydrous, 99.8%

  • 107-21-1

  • 324558-100ML

  • 493.74CNY

  • Detail
  • Sigma-Aldrich

  • (324558)  Ethyleneglycol  anhydrous, 99.8%

  • 107-21-1

  • 324558-1L

  • 1,000.35CNY

  • Detail
  • Sigma-Aldrich

  • (324558)  Ethyleneglycol  anhydrous, 99.8%

  • 107-21-1

  • 324558-12X100ML

  • 4,930.38CNY

  • Detail
  • Sigma-Aldrich

  • (324558)  Ethyleneglycol  anhydrous, 99.8%

  • 107-21-1

  • 324558-2L

  • 1,482.39CNY

  • Detail

107-21-1SDS

SAFETY DATA SHEETS

According to Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) - Sixth revised edition

Version: 1.0

Creation Date: Aug 10, 2017

Revision Date: Aug 10, 2017

1.Identification

1.1 GHS Product identifier

Product name Ethylene glycol

1.2 Other means of identification

Product number -
Other names 1,2-dihydroxy ethane

1.3 Recommended use of the chemical and restrictions on use

Identified uses For industry use only. Ethylene glycol is used as antifreeze in cooling and heating systems, in hydraulic brake fluids, as an industrial humectant, as an ingredient of electrolytic condensers, as a solvent in the paint and plastics industries, in the formulations of printers' inks, stamp pad inks, and inks for ballpoint pens, as a softening agent for cellophane, and in the synthesis of safety explosives, plasticizers, synthetic fibers (Terylene, Dacron), and synthetic waxes. Ethylene glycol is also used to de-ice airport runways and aircraft. (2)
Uses advised against no data available

1.4 Supplier's details

1.5 Emergency phone number

Emergency phone number -
Service hours Monday to Friday, 9am-5pm (Standard time zone: UTC/GMT +8 hours).

More Details:107-21-1 SDS

107-21-1Synthetic route

[1,3]-dioxolan-2-one
96-49-1

[1,3]-dioxolan-2-one

A

methanol
67-56-1

methanol

B

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With 1,1′-(pyridine-2,6-diylbis(methylene))bis(3-butylimidazolium) dibromide; carbonylchlorohydridobis(tricyclohexylphosphine)ruthenium(II); potassium tert-butylate; hydrogen In 1,4-dioxane at 130℃; under 37503.8 Torr; for 12h; Catalytic behavior; Reagent/catalyst; Temperature; Pressure; Autoclave;A 39%
B 100%
With hydrogen In 1,4-dioxane at 250℃; under 30003 Torr; for 4h; Temperature; Solvent; Reagent/catalyst; Flow reactor;A 93%
B 99%
With C24H38Cl2N3PRu; hydrogen; sodium methylate In tetrahydrofuran at 25℃; under 38002.6 Torr; for 16h; Autoclave;A 99 %Chromat.
B 95%
[1,3]-dioxolan-2-one
96-49-1

[1,3]-dioxolan-2-one

methanol
67-56-1

methanol

A

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

B

carbonic acid dimethyl ester
616-38-6

carbonic acid dimethyl ester

Conditions
ConditionsYield
anion exchanging resin at 80.4 - 98℃; for 6h; Product distribution / selectivity;A 99%
B 99.7%
potassium hydroxide In water at 98℃; under 838.584 Torr; for 500 - 6000h; Product distribution / selectivity; Heating / reflux;A n/a
B 99.88%
potassium hydroxide at 98 - 130℃; under 784.578 - 838.584 Torr; for 500 - 6000h; Product distribution / selectivity; Heating / reflux;A n/a
B 99.99%
[1,3]-dioxolan-2-one
96-49-1

[1,3]-dioxolan-2-one

methanol
67-56-1

methanol

A

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

B

carbonic acid dimethyl ester
616-38-6

carbonic acid dimethyl ester

C

diethylene glycol
111-46-6

diethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
potassium hydroxide at 63.8 - 98℃; for 6.7h; Product distribution / selectivity;A 99.1%
B 99.8%
C n/a
sodium hydroxide at 49.8 - 56.2℃; under 342.034 Torr; Product distribution / selectivity; Industry scale;A 91.3%
B 91.3%
C n/a
potassium hydroxide at 47 - 56℃; under 228.023 - 342.034 Torr; Product distribution / selectivity; Industry scale;A 90.5%
B 90.5%
C n/a
at 55.9 - 56℃; under 342.034 Torr; Product distribution / selectivity; Industry scale;A 38.9%
B 38.9%
C n/a
ETOFIBRATE
31637-97-5

ETOFIBRATE

A

nicotinic acid
59-67-6

nicotinic acid

B

Clofibric acid
882-09-7

Clofibric acid

C

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With hydrogenchloride; [RuCl2(CO)2(Ph2P-3-C6H4COOH)2] In methanol; water at 75℃; for 0.333333h;A 99.1%
B n/a
C n/a
oxirane
75-21-8

oxirane

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With C19H21N2(1+)*CHO2(1-); water at 110℃; under 15001.5 Torr; for 0.5h; Reagent/catalyst; Temperature; Autoclave; Inert atmosphere;99%
With water at 98℃; under 9000.9 Torr; Reagent/catalyst;95%
With water at 94℃; Kinetics; Concentration; Temperature; Autoclave;87.2%
[1,3]-dioxolan-2-one
96-49-1

[1,3]-dioxolan-2-one

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With [carbonylchlorohydrido{bis[2-(diphenylphosphinomethyl)ethyl]amino}ethylamino] ruthenium(II); potassium tert-butylate; hydrogen In tetrahydrofuran at 140℃; under 38002.6 Torr; for 0.5h; Time; Pressure; Autoclave;99%
In water at 250℃; for 2h; Temperature; Sealed tube; Inert atmosphere;99%
With potassium tert-butylate; hydrogen; C16H18BrCoINO2 In dibutyl ether at 160℃; under 45004.5 Torr; for 20h; Sealed tube; Autoclave;92%
C34H42O2Si2

C34H42O2Si2

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With methanol; bromine for 0.5h; Heating;99%
2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane
497-26-7

2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With water under 76.0051 - 760.051 Torr; Reflux;99%
With water; silica gel In neat (no solvent) at 150℃; under 1147.61 Torr; for 24h; Autoclave;10%
2-hydroxymethyl-1,3-dioxolane
5694-68-8

2-hydroxymethyl-1,3-dioxolane

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With hydrogen; palladium on activated charcoal In water at 160℃; under 103430 Torr; for 4h;98.3%
1,2-bis-tosyloxyethane
6315-52-2

1,2-bis-tosyloxyethane

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With cerium(III) chloride; sodium iodide In acetonitrile for 2h; tosylate cleavage; Heating;98%
Dimethyl oxalate
553-90-2

Dimethyl oxalate

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With hydrogen In methanol at 179.84℃; under 18751.9 Torr;98%
With C24H38Cl2N3PRu; hydrogen; sodium methylate In isopropyl alcohol at 100℃; under 38002.6 Torr; for 2h; Autoclave;97%
With C24H38Cl2N3PRu; hydrogen; sodium methylate In isopropyl alcohol at 100℃; under 37503.8 Torr; for 2h;97%
polyethylene terephthalate

polyethylene terephthalate

A

disodium terephthalate
10028-70-3

disodium terephthalate

B

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With sodium hydroxide In octanol at 183℃; for 0.0833333h; Product distribution / selectivity;A 98%
B n/a
With sodium hydroxide In hexan-1-ol at 147℃; for 0.25h; Product distribution / selectivity;
ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With 5% active carbon-supported ruthenium; water; hydrogen at 60℃; under 22502.3 Torr; for 3h; Autoclave;98%
With 5% active carbon-supported ruthenium; hydrogen In water at 80℃; under 67506.8 Torr; for 3h; Temperature; Pressure; Autoclave;98%
Glycolaldehyde
141-46-8

Glycolaldehyde

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With tributylphosphine; carbon monoxide; hydrogen; acetylacetonatodicarbonylrhodium(l) In various solvent(s) at 80℃; under 73505.8 Torr; for 1h; Product distribution; other solvent (DMI); other reactn. time; other catalysts;97%
With hydrogen; nickel In water at 40℃; under 37503.8 Torr; for 15h;90%
durch Einw.gaerender Hefe;
glycolic acid methyl ester
96-35-5

glycolic acid methyl ester

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With C24H38Cl2N3PRu; hydrogen; sodium methylate In isopropyl alcohol at 100℃; under 38002.6 Torr; for 2h; Autoclave;97%
With C24H38Cl2N3PRu; hydrogen; sodium methylate In isopropyl alcohol at 100℃; under 37503.8 Torr; for 2h;97%
With sodium tetrahydroborate In diethylene glycol dimethyl ether at 32 - 35℃; for 2h;89%
polyethylene terephthalate

polyethylene terephthalate

A

terephthalic acid
100-21-0

terephthalic acid

B

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
Stage #1: polyethylene terephthalate With sodium hydroxide In propan-1-ol at 89℃; for 0.25h;
Stage #2: With hydrogenchloride In propan-1-ol; water Product distribution / selectivity;
A 96%
B n/a
methanol
67-56-1

methanol

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
mercury Irradiation;95%
In water for 200h; Solvent; Reagent/catalyst; Wavelength; Inert atmosphere; Irradiation; Green chemistry;55%
With mercury Heating; Irradiation;97 % Chromat.
2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1,3-dioxolane
2403-50-1

2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1,3-dioxolane

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With sodium hydrogen sulfate; silica gel In dichloromethane; isopropyl alcohol at 20℃; for 2h;95%
glycerol
56-81-5

glycerol

A

propylene glycol
57-55-6

propylene glycol

B

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
In isopropyl alcohol at 180℃; under 3750.38 Torr; for 24h; Inert atmosphere; Autoclave;A 94%
B 6%
With water; hydrogen; alumina, 27%; copper, 5%; copper oxide, 64%; lanthanum oxide, 5%; mixture of In methanol at 297℃; under 37503.8 Torr; Product distribution / selectivity;A 86.2%
B 8.8%
With Ru-Cu/TMG-BEN at 230℃; under 60006 Torr; for 18h; Autoclave;A 85%
B n/a
glycolide
502-97-6

glycolide

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With water; copper(II) oxide; zinc at 250℃; for 2.5h; Reagent/catalyst; Inert atmosphere; Autoclave;94%
With [RuH(CO)(BPy-tPNN*)]; hydrogen In tetrahydrofuran at 110℃; under 7600.51 Torr; for 48h; Inert atmosphere;93 %Chromat.
methanol
67-56-1

methanol

(2-hydroxyethyl) methyl carbonate
106729-72-0

(2-hydroxyethyl) methyl carbonate

A

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

B

carbonic acid dimethyl ester
616-38-6

carbonic acid dimethyl ester

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With film supported Penicillium expansum at 60℃; for 48h; Reagent/catalyst; Concentration; Temperature; Time; Enzymatic reaction;A 93%
B 93%
4-butanolide
96-48-0

4-butanolide

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With C24H38Cl2N3PRu; hydrogen; sodium methylate In tetrahydrofuran at 25℃; under 37503.8 Torr; for 16h;93%
glycolic Acid
79-14-1

glycolic Acid

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With hydrogen In water at 119.84℃; under 7500.75 - 60006 Torr; for 2h; Catalytic behavior; Reagent/catalyst; Autoclave; Sealed tube;92%
With ruthenium(IV) oxide; water at 150℃; under 478080 - 570018 Torr; Hydrogenation;
With water; pyrographite; ruthenium at 150℃; under 478080 - 570018 Torr; Hydrogenation;
With hydrogen; toluene-4-sulfonic acid; tris(2,4-pentanedionato)ruthenium(III); [2-((diphenylphospino)methyl)-2-methyl-1,3-propanediyl]bis[diphenylphosphine] In methanol at 200℃; under 12751.3 - 103510 Torr; for 3h; Product distribution / selectivity;
With hydrogen; toluene-4-sulfonic acid; tris(2,4-pentanedionato)ruthenium(III); [2-((diphenylphospino)methyl)-2-methyl-1,3-propanediyl]bis[diphenylphosphine] In ethylene glycol at 200℃; under 12751.3 - 103510 Torr; for 3h; Product distribution / selectivity;
Dimethyl oxalate
553-90-2

Dimethyl oxalate

methanol
67-56-1

methanol

A

glycolic acid methyl ester
96-35-5

glycolic acid methyl ester

B

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With hydrogen at 199.84℃; under 22502.3 Torr; Reagent/catalyst;A 90.6%
B n/a
oxirane
75-21-8

oxirane

[1,3]-dioxolan-2-one
96-49-1

[1,3]-dioxolan-2-one

aniline
62-53-3

aniline

A

N-phenyl-2-oxazolidinone
703-56-0

N-phenyl-2-oxazolidinone

B

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolim bromide; 3-butyl-1-methylimidazolium acetate at 140℃; for 9h;A 90%
B 90%
alpha-D-glucopyranose
492-62-6

alpha-D-glucopyranose

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
Stage #1: alpha-D-glucopyranose In water Pyrolysis;
Stage #2: With 5% active carbon-supported ruthenium; hydrogen at 80℃; under 67506.8 Torr; for 6h; Pressure; Autoclave;
88.8%
With 1% Ru/SiO2; hydrogen In water at 195℃; under 22502.3 - 63756.4 Torr; Inert atmosphere;
methanol
67-56-1

methanol

methylbutane
78-78-4

methylbutane

A

3,3,4,4-Tetramethylhexan
5171-84-6

3,3,4,4-Tetramethylhexan

B

2,3-dimethylbutanol
19550-30-2, 20281-85-0

2,3-dimethylbutanol

C

2,2-Dimethyl-1-butanol
1185-33-7

2,2-Dimethyl-1-butanol

D

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With mercury for 17h; Product distribution; Mechanism; Heating; Irradiation; other alkanes; selectivity of cross-dimerization, relative reactivities in cross-dimerizations;A n/a
B 11%
C 88%
D n/a
With mercury for 17h; Heating; Irradiation;A n/a
B 11%
C 88%
D n/a
Dimethyl oxalate
553-90-2

Dimethyl oxalate

A

glycolic acid methyl ester
96-35-5

glycolic acid methyl ester

B

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With C32H32Cl2N2P2Ru; hydrogen; sodium methylate In para-xylene; toluene at 5 - 100℃; under 37503.8 Torr; for 4h; Reagent/catalyst; Glovebox;A 86%
B 13%
With hydrogen In methanol at 219.84℃; under 18751.9 Torr; Autoclave;A 76%
B n/a
With hydrogen In methanol at 219.84℃; under 18751.9 Torr; Autoclave;A 31%
B n/a
[1,3]-dioxolan-2-one
96-49-1

[1,3]-dioxolan-2-one

A

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

B

carbonic acid dimethyl ester
616-38-6

carbonic acid dimethyl ester

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With potassium carbonate In methanol at 169.84℃; for 1h; Temperature; Reagent/catalyst; Autoclave;A n/a
B 86%
With polystyrene resin bound methylimidazole hydroxyl ionic liquid catalyst In methanol at 80℃; for 8h; Catalytic behavior; Temperature; Ionic liquid;
With 2,6-di(isopropyl)pyridine In methanol at 90℃; under 760.051 Torr; for 10h; Temperature; Reagent/catalyst; Solvent; Inert atmosphere;
piperonal
120-57-0

piperonal

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

5-[1,3]dioxolan-2-yl-benzo[1,3]dioxole
4405-18-9

5-[1,3]dioxolan-2-yl-benzo[1,3]dioxole

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In benzene for 3h; Heating;100%
With sodium hydrogen sulfate; silica gel for 0.1h; Etherification; Acetalization; microwave irradiation;84%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid at 120℃; for 0.5h;59%
cyclohexanone
108-94-1

cyclohexanone

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

1,3-dioxolane-2-spirocyclohexane
177-10-6

1,3-dioxolane-2-spirocyclohexane

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With zeolite HSZ-360 In toluene for 3h; Heating;100%
With [Al(H2O)6][MS]3 In cyclohexane for 0.833333h; Reagent/catalyst; Dean-Stark; Reflux;100%
With AgOTf and (3-(3,5-bis(diphenylphosphino)phenyl)-pyridine) In toluene for 12h; Reflux;99%
acetic anhydride
108-24-7

acetic anhydride

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

ethylene glycol diacetate
111-55-7

ethylene glycol diacetate

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With H-Y zeolite at 60℃; for 2h;100%
With sodium hydroxide for 0.0194444h; microwave irradiation;99%
With SiO2-supported Co(II) Salen complex catalyst at 50℃; for 0.833333h;99%
para-bromoacetophenone
99-90-1

para-bromoacetophenone

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

2-(4-bromophenyl)-2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane
4360-68-3

2-(4-bromophenyl)-2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In benzene for 39h; Heating;100%
With p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate In benzene for 50h; Inert atmosphere; Reflux; Dean-Stark;100%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In toluene at 160℃; for 16h; Dean-Stark; Inert atmosphere;99%
4-nitrobenzaldehdye
555-16-8

4-nitrobenzaldehdye

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

2-(4-nitrophenyl)-1,3-dioxolane
2403-53-4

2-(4-nitrophenyl)-1,3-dioxolane

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In toluene at 143℃; for 2h; Dean-Stark;100%
With cyclohexane at 105℃; for 1h; Dean-Stark;100%
With p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate In toluene for 4h; Reflux;100%
benzaldehyde
100-52-7

benzaldehyde

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

2-phenyl-1,3-dioxolane
936-51-6

2-phenyl-1,3-dioxolane

Conditions
ConditionsYield
aluminum oxide In tetrachloromethane for 24h; Heating; other catalyst: SiO2;100%
With monoaluminum phosphate In acetonitrile for 1.7h; Heating;100%
With monoaluminum phosphate In acetonitrile for 1.7h; Product distribution; Heating; reaction rate; other aldehydes, other heterogeneous catalysts system, var. reaction time, solvent and amount of reagents;100%
4-oxopimelate
6317-49-3

4-oxopimelate

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

ethyl 3-<2-<2-(ethoxycarbonyl)ethyl><1,3>dioxolan-2-yl>propionate
19719-88-1

ethyl 3-<2-<2-(ethoxycarbonyl)ethyl><1,3>dioxolan-2-yl>propionate

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With pyridinium p-toluenesulfonate In toluene for 2h; Reflux;100%
With pyridinium p-toluenesulfonate In toluene for 15h; Inert atmosphere; Reflux;99%
With pyridinium p-toluenesulfonate In toluene for 22h; Reflux; Dean-Stark;90%
4-heptanone
123-19-3

4-heptanone

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

2,2-dipropyl-1,3-dioxolane
41329-93-5

2,2-dipropyl-1,3-dioxolane

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In benzene for 24h; Reflux;100%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In toluene Reflux; Dean-Stark;47%
With sulfuric acid; sodium sulfate
bromo-5-pentanone-2
3884-71-7

bromo-5-pentanone-2

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

ethylene-cetal de la bromo-5 pentanone-2
24400-75-7

ethylene-cetal de la bromo-5 pentanone-2

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid; orthoformic acid triethyl ester at 20℃; for 25h;100%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid; orthoformic acid triethyl ester98%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In benzene for 5h; Heating;96%
(E)-3-phenylacrylic acid
140-10-3

(E)-3-phenylacrylic acid

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

2-hydroxyethyl 3-(phenyl)-2-propenoate
146604-63-9

2-hydroxyethyl 3-(phenyl)-2-propenoate

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With sulfuric acid In toluene Heating;100%
at 210℃;
dehydroepiandrosterone
53-43-0

dehydroepiandrosterone

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

3β-hydroxy-17,17-ethylenedioxo-5-androstene
7745-40-6, 14456-21-4

3β-hydroxy-17,17-ethylenedioxo-5-androstene

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With camphor-10-sulfonic acid In toluene at 111℃;100%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In benzene for 4.5h; Heating;99%
With camphor-10-sulfonic acid In cyclohexane for 20h; Reflux;99%
isopregnanolone
516-55-2

isopregnanolone

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

(3β,5α)-3-hydroxypregnan-20-one 1,2-ethanediyl acetal
2124-26-7, 14615-04-4, 14957-69-8, 18000-89-0, 18125-29-6, 95670-99-8, 126451-96-5

(3β,5α)-3-hydroxypregnan-20-one 1,2-ethanediyl acetal

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid; trimethyl orthoformate In dichloromethane at 20℃;100%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid; trimethyl orthoformate In dichloromethane at 20℃;95%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In toluene for 12h; Reflux; Dean-Stark;74%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid; benzene
ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

acetic acid
64-19-7

acetic acid

ethylene glycol diacetate
111-55-7

ethylene glycol diacetate

Conditions
ConditionsYield
zirconium(IV) oxide at 180℃; for 2h; in autoclave;100%
With 1-(3-sulfonic acid)propylimidazole bisulfate ([Ps-im]HSO4) supported silica In cyclohexane at 150℃; under 760.051 Torr; for 5h; Pressure; Temperature; Time;99.61%
With sulfonated charcoal In benzene for 5h; Heating;95%
ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

hexanal
66-25-1

hexanal

2-pentyl-1,3-dioxolane
3515-94-4

2-pentyl-1,3-dioxolane

Conditions
ConditionsYield
distannoxane 1a In benzene for 0.5h; Mechanism; Product distribution; Heating; other distannoxane catalysts, other aldehydes, other alcohol, other solvents, other reaction times;100%
With 9.0 wt% H4[SiW12O40] on SiO2 In neat (no solvent) at 60℃; for 6h; Reagent/catalyst; chemoselective reaction;99%
With Kaolinitic clay In benzene for 2h; Heating;90%
ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

4-bromo-benzaldehyde
1122-91-4

4-bromo-benzaldehyde

p-bromobenzaldehyde 1,3-dioxolane
10602-01-4

p-bromobenzaldehyde 1,3-dioxolane

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In toluene at 100 - 110℃; for 5h;100%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In toluene at 110℃; for 12h;100%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In toluene Reflux;98%
ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

2-chloro-[1,3,2]dioxarsolane
3741-33-1

2-chloro-[1,3,2]dioxarsolane

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With dichloro(2-chlorovinyl)arsine100%
With arsenic trichloride In tetrachloromethane at 15 - 20℃; for 1h;57%
With pyridine; diethyl ether; arsenic trichloride
ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

1,2-bis(1,3,2-dioxaarsolan-2-yloxy)ethane
14849-23-1

1,2-bis(1,3,2-dioxaarsolan-2-yloxy)ethane

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With arsenous acid triisobutyl ester100%
With arsenic trichloride at 40 - 70℃;66%
With arsenic(III) trioxide at 140℃;
morpholine
110-91-8

morpholine

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

2-(morpholin-4-yl)ethanol
622-40-2

2-(morpholin-4-yl)ethanol

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With triphenylphosphine; ruthenium trichloride at 120℃; for 2h;100%
5-bromo-2-thiophencarboxaldehyde
4701-17-1

5-bromo-2-thiophencarboxaldehyde

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

2-(5-bromothiophen-2-yl)-1,3-dioxolane
52157-62-7

2-(5-bromothiophen-2-yl)-1,3-dioxolane

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In toluene for 2h; Heating;100%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In toluene for 0.15h; Reflux; Dean-Stark;98%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In toluene for 15h; Reflux; Dean-Stark;98%
2-(4-bromo-3-oxobutyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione
51132-00-4

2-(4-bromo-3-oxobutyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

2-[2-(2-Bromomethyl-[1,3]dioxolan-2-yl)-ethyl]-isoindole-1,3-dione
63200-66-8

2-[2-(2-Bromomethyl-[1,3]dioxolan-2-yl)-ethyl]-isoindole-1,3-dione

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With sulfuric acid In benzene for 5h; Heating;100%
6-bromo-3,4-methylenedioxybenzaldehyde
15930-53-7

6-bromo-3,4-methylenedioxybenzaldehyde

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

5-bromo-6-(1,3-dioxolan-2-yl)benzo[d][1,3]dioxolane
2139-43-7

5-bromo-6-(1,3-dioxolan-2-yl)benzo[d][1,3]dioxolane

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In toluene Heating;100%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In benzene at 0 - 90℃; for 5h; Dean-Stark;98%
Stage #1: 6-bromo-3,4-methylenedioxybenzaldehyde; ethylene glycol With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In toluene for 24h; Inert atmosphere; Reflux;
Stage #2: With potassium carbonate In toluene for 0.5h; Inert atmosphere;
96%
benzoyl chloride
98-88-4

benzoyl chloride

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

C9H10O3
94-33-7

C9H10O3

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With dimethyltin dichloride; potassium carbonate In tetrahydrofuran for 12h; Ambient temperature;100%
With dimethyltin dichloride; potassium carbonate In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; Acylation;99%
With pyridine In dichloromethane at 0 - 20℃; for 25h; Inert atmosphere;86%
2-chloro-3-quinoline carboxaldehyde
73568-25-9

2-chloro-3-quinoline carboxaldehyde

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

2-chloro-3-[1,3-dioxolan-2-yl]-quinoline
128348-73-2

2-chloro-3-[1,3-dioxolan-2-yl]-quinoline

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In benzene for 4h; Heating;100%
With molecular sieve; toluene-4-sulfonic acid In toluene Heating;92%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In benzene at 120℃; for 4h;75%
1-methoxycarbonyl-4-(3-oxo-1-butyl)indole
73796-03-9

1-methoxycarbonyl-4-(3-oxo-1-butyl)indole

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

4-[2-(2-Methyl-[1,3]dioxolan-2-yl)-ethyl]-indole-1-carboxylic acid methyl ester
74069-06-0

4-[2-(2-Methyl-[1,3]dioxolan-2-yl)-ethyl]-indole-1-carboxylic acid methyl ester

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In benzene for 1h; Heating;100%
5-(2-formyl-6-methoxy-1,2,3,4,5,8-hexahydro-isoquinolin-1-ylmethyl)-2-methoxy-phenol
58780-17-9

5-(2-formyl-6-methoxy-1,2,3,4,5,8-hexahydro-isoquinolin-1-ylmethyl)-2-methoxy-phenol

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

C20H25NO5
74007-22-0

C20H25NO5

Conditions
ConditionsYield
methanesulfonic acid In tetrahydrofuran at 25℃; for 1h;100%
With methanesulfonic acid In chloroform; 1-Propyl acetate at 5 - 10℃; for 0.666667h;
Hexafluorobenzene
392-56-3

Hexafluorobenzene

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

ethyleneglycol bispentafluorophenyl ether
6719-70-6

ethyleneglycol bispentafluorophenyl ether

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With sodium amide In ammonia at -40 - -33℃; for 6h; Product distribution; Mechanism; var. ratio of regents; var. substituted benzenes and nucleophilic reagents;100%
With sodium amide 1.) liquid ammonia, 2.) from -40 to 33 deg C, 6 h; Yield given. Multistep reaction;
2,2-dimethyl-4-pentenal
5497-67-6

2,2-dimethyl-4-pentenal

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

4,4-dimethyl-5,5-(ethylenedioxy)-1-pentene
87802-43-5

4,4-dimethyl-5,5-(ethylenedioxy)-1-pentene

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In benzene Heating;100%
toluene-4-sulfonic acid In benzene for 0.666667h; Heating;95%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid95%
10-Undecenal
112-45-8

10-Undecenal

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

10-undecenal ethylene glycol acetal
6316-55-8

10-undecenal ethylene glycol acetal

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In benzene at 80℃; for 2h;100%
aluminum oxide In tetrachloromethane for 24h; Heating;97%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In water; benzene95%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In benzene Heating;90%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In water; benzene for 8h; Inert atmosphere; Reflux;90%
(E)-Ethyl 3-methyl-4-oxo-2-pentenoate
107368-26-3

(E)-Ethyl 3-methyl-4-oxo-2-pentenoate

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

(E)-ethyl 3-(2-methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl)-but-2-enoate
125318-05-0

(E)-ethyl 3-(2-methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl)-but-2-enoate

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With pyridinium p-toluenesulfonate In benzene for 60h; Heating;100%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid; trimethyl orthoformate In dichloromethane at 20℃; for 12h; Inert atmosphere;
(4-bromophenyl)(phenyl)methanone
90-90-4

(4-bromophenyl)(phenyl)methanone

ethylene glycol
107-21-1

ethylene glycol

2-(4-bromophenyl)-2-phenyl-1,3-dioxolane
59793-76-9

2-(4-bromophenyl)-2-phenyl-1,3-dioxolane

Conditions
ConditionsYield
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In benzene for 48h; acetalisation; Heating;100%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In benzene at 160℃; for 40h; Inert atmosphere;94%
With toluene-4-sulfonic acid In benzene for 44h; Heating;92%

107-21-1Related news

Comparative techno-economic analysis of oil-based and coal-based Ethylene glycol (cas 107-21-1) processes08/19/2019

Traditional ethylene glycol production is heavily dependent on oil. In the background of richness of coal and scarcity of oil, more and more coal to ethylene glycol (CTEG) plants have been successfully operated to relieve the shortage of ethylene glycol in China. Thus, it is an urgent work to an...detailed

Electro-oxidation of Ethylene glycol (cas 107-21-1) on PtCo metal synergy for direct Ethylene glycol (cas 107-21-1) fuel cells: Reduced graphene oxide imparting a notable surface of action08/18/2019

Slow electro-oxidation reaction and low power output are two major limiting factors in successful commercialization of fuel cell technology. An efficient and stable electro-catalyst with effectual metal combination supported on a durable matrix may provide a viable solution to overcome these iss...detailed

107-21-1Relevant articles and documents

Efficient conversion of microcrystalline cellulose to 1,2-alkanediols over supported Ni catalysts

Wang, Xicheng,Meng, Lingqian,Wu, Feng,Jiang, Yijun,Wang, Lei,Mu, Xindong

, p. 758 - 765 (2012)

Nickel supported on a variety of supports was evaluated in the batchwise hydrogenolysis of high-crystalline cellulose under hydrothermal conditions. The supports examined included Al2O3, kieselguhr, TiO 2, SiO2, activated carbon (AC), ZnO, ZrO2 and MgO. All tested catalysts can effectively convert cellulose while the choice of supports plays a critical role in the product distribution and selectivity. The Ni catalysts favour the formation of industrially attractive 1,2-alkanediols such as 1,2-propanediol, ethylene glycol, 1,2-butanediol and 1,2-hexanediol. It was found that the bifunctional ZnO-supported Ni catalysts displayed superior activities and the best result was obtained on 20% Ni/ZnO which exhibited complete conversion of cellulose with up to 70.4% total glycol yields. The mechanism of the reaction involved was tentatively proposed by identifying the products formed. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012.

Hydrogenation of dimethyl oxalate to ethylene glycol over Cu/KIT-6 catalysts

Yu, Xinbin,Burkholder, Michael,Karakalos, Stavros G.,Tate, Gregory L.,Monnier, John R.,Gupton, B. Frank,Williams, Christopher T.

, p. 2403 - 2413 (2021)

Copper supported on KIT-6 mesoporous silica was preparedviaammonia evaporation (AE) method and applied for the catalytic hydrogenation of dimethyl oxalate (DMO) to ethylene glycol (EG). The high specific surface area and interconnected mesoporous channels of the support facilitated the dispersion of copper species. The effect of AE temperature and copper loading on the structure of catalysts and induced change in hydrogenation performance were studied in detail. The results showed that both parameters influenced the overall and/or intrinsic activity. The hydrogenation of DMO to EG was proposed to proceedviathe synergy between Cu0and Cu+sites and catalysts with high surface Cu0/Cu+ratio exhibited high intrinsic activity in the investigated range.

One-pot synthesized core/shell structured zeolite@copper catalysts for selective hydrogenation of ethylene carbonate to methanol and ethylene glycol

Ding, Yu,Tian, Jingxia,Chen, Wei,Guan, Yejun,Xu, Hao,Li, Xiaohong,Wu, Haihong,Wu, Peng

, p. 5414 - 5426 (2019)

Copper-based catalysts, with highly dispersed and stabilized Cu nanoparticles, intensified mass transfer and a well-balanced Cu0/Cu+ ratio at low Cu loadings, are highly desirable for the selective hydrogenation of ethylene carbonate to ethylene glycol and methanol, an efficient indirect route of CO2 utilization. A hierarchically core/shell-structured Silicalite-1@Cu composite was developed via a base-assisted chemoselective host-guest interaction between the silicon species of MFI-type Silicalite-1 and external Cu salt source. In situ generated mesoporosity and strong Cu-silicate interaction made the uniform Cu NPs firmly immobilized and highly dispersed outside the core S-1 crystals. The S-1@Cu hybrid possessed the co-existing Cu0/Cu+ active species with a suitable ratio, and served as a highly active, selective and robust catalyst for selective ethylene carbonate hydrogenation, providing a lifetime >350 h together with >99% ethylene carbonate conversion, >99% ethylene glycol yield, and more importantly 93% methanol yield at a relatively low Cu loading of 21.4 wt%.

Adams,Baxendale

, p. 4215 (1958)

Mechanistic aspects of the oxidative functionalization of ethane and ethanol by platinum(II) salts in aqueous medium. Role of platinum(II)-olefin and platinum(IV) - alkyl intermediates

Hutson, Alan C.,Lin, Minren,Basickes, Naomi,Sen, Ayusman

, p. 69 - 74 (1995)

The relative rate of C-H bond activation by the Pt(II) ion decreased in the order H-CH2CH3 > H-CH2CH2OH > H-CH(OH)CH3.The platinum(II)-ethylene complex, -, 1, was the key intermediate in the oxidation of ethane, ethanol, and diethyl ether to 1,2-ethanediol by platinum(II) in aqueous medium.In particular, the intermediacy of 1 in the oxidation of ethanol to 1,2-ethanediol and 2-chloroethanol was verified through labeling studies.In D2O, 1, upon oxidation with one of a number of oxidants, converted to 2-, 2. 2 in turn decomposed to a mixture of 1,2-ethanediol and 2-chloroethanol on heating.The rate conversion of 1 was a function of pH, the anions present, and the oxidant used.While the conversion of 1 to 2 involved a nucleophilic attack by water (or hydroxide ion), such a step was not observed in the absence of an oxidant.In basic D2O, the sequential replacement of Cl- by OD- in 1 occurred to successively form -, - and -.The process was reversed upon acidification.The species 2-, 3, appeared to be the source for the small quantities of hydroxy- and/or chloroacetaldehyde formed during the oxidation of 1. 3 was synthesized independently by the reaction of acetaldehyde with a mixture of PtCl42-, and PtCl62- in aqueous medium.When 1 was oxidized by Cl2 in CD3OD solution, the principal product was 2- 4, when a small amount of water was present, and CD3OCH2CH2OCD3 in the absence of water. Keywords: Platinum complex; C-H activation; Oxidation; Ethane; Ethylene; Ethanol

Hydrogenolysis of glycerol over supported bimetallic Ni/Cu catalysts with and without external hydrogen addition in a fixed-bed flow reactor

Cai, Fufeng,Pan, Donghui,Ibrahim, Jessica Juweriah,Zhang, Jun,Xiao, Guomin

, p. 172 - 182 (2018)

The role of high hydrogen pressure in the hydrogenolysis of glycerol to 1,2-propanediol has been studied extensively. Given the peculiar properties of hydrogen such as its inflammability and explosibility, the hydrogenolysis of glycerol without external hydrogen addition seems a more advantageous option. This study focuses on the conversion of glycerol to 1,2-propanediol over different supported bimetallic Ni/Cu catalysts in a fixed-bed flow reactor, using in situ hydrogen production and external hydrogen. Among the catalysts prepared, Ni/Cu/TiO2 catalyst was observed to efficiently catalyze the hydrogenolysis of glycerol to 1,2-propanediol under N2 pressure using 2-propanol as hydrogen source. This was due to the high Cu dispersion and Ni/Cu atomic ratio on the catalyst surface. However, the experimental results indicated that the effect of catalyst acid sites on glycerol hydrogenolysis was more noticeable when the reaction was performed under H2 pressure. The metal active sites of the catalyst played a significant role in the hydrogen production and also affected the glycerol hydrogenolysis with hydrogen produced from 2-propanol catalytic transfer hydrogenation (CTH) and glycerol aqueous phase reforming (APR). The stability study revealed that the Ni/Cu/TiO2 catalyst underwent serious deactivation during the hydrogenolysis of glycerol. The characterization results showed that the metal leaching and metal particles sintering were responsible for the catalyst deactivation when the glycerol hydrogenolysis was conducted using water as a solvent. However, the activity loss for reactions performed using 2-propanol as a solvent was mainly related to the metal particles sintering and the presence of adsorbed species on the catalyst surface.

Glycerol hydrogenolysis promoted by supported palladium catalysts

Musolino, Maria Grazia,Scarpino, Luciano Antonio,Mauriello, Francesco,Pietropaolo, Rosario

, p. 1143 - 1150 (2011)

Catalytic hydrogenolysis, with high conversion and selectivity, promoted by supported palladium substrates in isopropanol and dioxane at a low H 2 pressure (0.5MPa), is reported for the first time. The catalysts, characterized by using BET isotherms, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), temperature-programmed reduction (TPR), powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), were obtained by coprecipitation and impregnation techniques. The coprecipitation method allows catalysts with a metal-metal or a metal-support interaction to be obtained, which enhances the catalytic performance for both the conversion of glycerol and the selectivity to 1,2-propanediol. Analogous reactions carried out with catalysts prepared by using impregnation are less efficient. A study of the solvent and temperature effect is also presented. The obtained results allow the hydrogenolysis mechanism to be inferred; this involves both the direct replacement of the carbon-bonded OH group by an incoming hydrogen or the formation of hydroxyacetone as an intermediate, which subsequently undergoes a hydrogenation process to give 1,2-propanediol. Finally, catalytic tests on a large-scale reaction at a higher H2 pressure and recycling of the samples were carried out with the better performing catalysts (Pd/CoO and Pd/Fe 2O3 prepared by using coprecipitation) to verify possible industrial achievements.

Effect of Calcination Temperature on the Textural Properties and Catalytic Behavior of the Al2O3 Doped Mesoporous Monometallic Cu Catalysts in Dimethyl Oxalate Hydrogenation

Kong, Xiangpeng,Wu, Yuehuan,Yuan, Peihong,Wang, Man,Wu, Peng,Ding, Lifeng,Wang, Ruihong,Chen, Jiangang

, p. 2107 - 2115 (2021)

Abstract: Al2O3 doped mesoporous monometallic Cu catalysts were successfully synthesized though the self-assembly Cu species derived from the oxalate precursor undergoing thermal decomposing. The evolutions of microstructures, physicochemical and surface properties of the CuAl catalysts have been systematically characterized focusing on the effect of the calcination temperature during catalyst preparation. It is found that the textural and surface properties of the CuAl catalysts were profoundly affected by the calcination temperature, further determining the resultant catalytic behavior in dimethyl oxalate (DMO) hydrogenation. Particularly, the CuAl-500 possessing the maximum surface Cu+ sites and proper surface acid features exhibits?100.0% DMO conversion and 98.0% ethylene glycol (EG) selectivity in presence of the adequate active Cu0 sites, which is superior to that of the other catalysts under the identical reaction conditions. And no activity loss occurred for more than 200?h demonstrated of the outstanding stability of the CuAl-500 catalyst. Moreover, the synergistic effect between surface Cu+ and Cu0 sites should be responsible for DMO selective hydrogenation. Additionally, the strengthened chemical interaction between Cu and Al species endows the catalysts outstanding stability by suppressing the dispersive Cu NPs agglomeration during DMO hydrogenation. Graphic Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]

Design and preparation of hydrated MgAl supported Cu catalysts with high alkalinity by MOCVD for the hydrogenolysis of cellulose

Xiao, Zihui

, p. 343 - 349 (2017)

The unhydrated and hydrated MgAl supported Cu catalysts were successfully prepared by metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) method. The structure properties of metal-organic precursor, supports and catalysts were determined by 1H NMR, FTIR, XRD, N2 physisorption, TEM, N2O titration, and CO2-TPD. The hydration of support had a significant effect on the structure of the final catalysts. The hydrated Mg3Al1 support was benefited to the adsorption and deposition of CuII(hfac)2, resulting in the decrease of the reduction decomposition temperature. Due to the restoration of the layered structure, the 5%Cu/H-Mg3Al1 catalyst had a low BET surface area and pore volume. However, it exhibited higher base sites density and got better performance for cellulose hydrogenolysis compared to the 5%Cu/Mg3Al1 catalyst, which suggested that the hydration before reaction was superior to that during reaction for the catalytic performance, due to the competition between water and products (alcohols with strong adsorption) during reaction, resulting in a decrease in the concentration of in-situ formed surface OH? and the amount of base sites. It was noteworthy that unobvious change in phases of the 5%Cu/H-Mg3Al1 catalyst was observed before and after reaction, which provided a promising way to establish the relationship between structure and catalytic performance.

1,3-Dimethylimidazolium-2-carboxylate: A zwitterionic salt for the efficient synthesis of vicinal diols from cyclic carbonates

Sun, Jian,Yao, Xiaoqian,Cheng, Weiguo,Zhang, Suojiang

, p. 3297 - 3304 (2014)

The development of efficient, cheap and recyclable catalysts for reactions under mild reaction conditions is a very attractive topic in green chemistry. Herein, a series of basic ionic liquids (ILs) were investigated as catalysts for the synthesis of vicinal diols via the hydrolysis of cyclic carbonates in order to improve this kind of synthetic process. The effects of the IL structure, the molar ratio of cyclic carbonate to water, and various reaction parameters on the catalytic performance were investigated in detail. It was found that 1,3-dimethylimidazolium-2-carboxylate, a simple halogen-free zwitterionic catalyst, showed high activity (a space-time yield of 1086 h-1) and excellent selectivity for the preparation of ethylene glycol via the hydrolysis of ethylene carbonate. The catalyst could be reused over six times without obvious loss of catalytic activity. Also, it was applicable to a variety of cyclic carbonates for the production of their corresponding vicinal diols with high yields and selectivities. A possible catalytic cycle for this kind of catalytic process was proposed based on the experimental results, NMR spectroscopy and theoretical calculations. This reaction protocol opens a new possibility for chemical synthesis as a substitution for traditional base or basic ILs. This journal is the Partner Organisations 2014.

Studies on mechanism for homogeneous catalytic hydration of ethylene oxide: Effects of pH window and esterification

Yang, Zhi-Jian,Ren, Nan,Zhang, Ya-Hong,Tang, Yi

, p. 447 - 450 (2010)

Selective hydration of ethylene oxide (EO) was investigated with several inorganic salt systems as homogeneous catalysts. By optimizing reaction conditions, the highest monoethylene glycol (MEG) selectivity of 98% was obtained with >99% EO conversion at a water/EO molar ratio = 10. The effects of pH value and anion addition-esterification on MEG selectivity were systematically studied, and a comprehensive mechanism was proposed based on the results. The conclusion should be useful in developing high performance catalysts for the manufacture of MEG by EO hydration at a low water/EO ratio. Crown Copyright

Efficient Photoelectrochemical Conversion of Methane into Ethylene Glycol by WO3 Nanobar Arrays

Ma, Jun,Mao, Keke,Low, Jingxiang,Wang, Zihao,Xi, Dawei,Zhang, Wenqing,Ju, Huanxin,Qi, Zeming,Long, Ran,Wu, Xiaojun,Song, Li,Xiong, Yujie

, p. 9357 - 9361 (2021)

Photoelectrochemical (PEC) conversion of methane (CH4) has been extensively explored for the production of value-added chemicals, yet remains a great challenge in high selectivity toward C2+ products. Herein, we report the optimization of the reactivity of hydroxyl radicals (.OH) on WO3 via facet tuning to achieve efficient ethylene glycol production from PEC CH4 conversion. A combination of materials simulation and radicals trapping test provides insight into the reactivity of .OH on different facets of WO3, showing the highest reactivity of surface-bound .OH on {010} facets. As such, the WO3 with the highest {010} facet ratio exhibits a superior PEC CH4 conversion efficiency, reaching an ethylene glycol production rate of 0.47 μmol cm?2 h?1. Based on in situ characterization, the methanol, which could be attacked by reactive .OH to form hydroxymethyl radicals, is confirmed to be the main intermediate for the production of ethylene glycol. Our finding is expected to provide new insight for the design of active and selective catalysts toward PEC CH4 conversion.

Physical and chemical studies of tungsten carbide catalysts: Effects of Ni promotion and sulphonated carbon

Rodella, Cristiane B.,Barrett, Dean H.,Moya, Silvia F.,Figueroa, Santiago J.A.,Pimenta, Maria T. B.,Curvelo, Antonio Aprígio S.,Teixeira Da Silva, Victor

, p. 23874 - 23885 (2015)

Ni promoted tungsten carbides have been shown to be an effective catalyst for cellulose conversion reaction. With the use of both in situ and ex situ techniques an investigation into the physical and chemical aspects of the Ni-promoted tungsten carbide catalyst supported on activated carbon either in pure form or functionalized with sulfuric acid was conducted. In situ XRD analysis performed during the carburization process showed that non-promoted samples formed a mixture of nanosized W2C, WC1-x and WC carbide phases. In the case of Ni promoted catalysts, in situ XRD, XANES, XPS and TEM analysis revealed that Ni aids in lowering the carburization temperature by 50 °C but also assisted in the deposition of polymeric carbon onto the catalyst surface which reduced cellulose conversion. However, the results indicate beneficial effects caused by the high carbon coverage by stopping the W2C to WC carbide phase transition. Thus, carburization of Ni promoted samples produced only W2C phase, which is stable up to 800°C. The functionalization of activated-carbon with -SO3H not only increases the hydrolysis of cellulose but also lead to a greater dispersion of Ni over the catalyst. The resulting improvement in the interaction between Ni/W/C increases the cellulose transformation in a one-pot synthesis towards the production of ethylene glycol.

Enhanced catalytic performance for SiO2-TiO2 binary oxide supported Cu-based catalyst in the hydrogenation of dimethyloxalate

Wen, Chao,Yin, Anyuan,Cui, Yuanyuan,Yang, Xinli,Dai, Wei-Lin,Fan, Kangnian

, p. 82 - 89 (2013)

Copper based catalyst with Si-Ti binary-oxide support is synthesized via a facile ammonia evaporation method for selective hydrogenation of dimethyloxalate (DMO) to ethylene glycol (EG). 100% conversion of DMO and 90% selectivity to EG could be obtained over the Cu/SiO2-TiO2 catalyst at high liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV). Catalytic stability is greatly enhanced when the Si-Ti binary oxide is used as support because of the intimate interaction between copper species and the support. The improved catalytic performance compared to the unitary oxide-supported catalysts SiO2 and TiO2 could be attributed to the highly dispersed copper species stabilized by the binary support. Also, the electron transfer from TiO 2 to Cu-species is found to play an important role in improving the surface charge density of the metallic copper, which is helpful to improve the catalytic activity.

A New Aspect of the Pressure Effect in Syngas Conversion to Ethylene Glycol

Masuda, Takashi,Murata, Kazuhisa,Matsuda, Akio

, p. 1287 - 1289 (1986)

Pressure effect in syngas conversion to ethylene glycol (EG) is understood in terms of respective partial pressures of hydrogen (PH2) and carbon monoxide (PCO).A new mechanism is proposed to explain an etraordinary effect of PH2 on the selectivity to EG.

Chiral Polyol Synthesis Catalyzed by a Thermostable Transketolase Immobilized on Layered Double Hydroxides in Ionic liquids

Ali, Ghina,Moreau, Thomas,Forano, Claude,Mousty, Christine,Prevot, Vanessa,Charmantray, Franck,Hecquet, Laurence

, p. 3163 - 3170 (2015)

In this work we set out to study the activity of a thermostable Transketolase (TK) from Geobacillus stearothermophilus (TKgst) in an ionic liquid as cosolvent, which has never been investigated before with this enzyme. 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([BMIm][Cl]) in the range 30-50% in water maintained the total activity of TKgst and increased the reaction rate in the presence of pentoses as acceptor substrates, particularly d-ribose. To improve the synthetic process, TKgst was immobilized on an inorganic support, layered double hydroxides (LDHs), with excellent immobilization yield and catalytic activity using a simple, eco-compatible, efficient coprecipitation procedure. The biohybrid MgAl@TKgst was tested in 30% [BMIm][Cl] for the synthesis of a rare, very costly commercially available sugar, d-sedoheptulose, which was obtained in one step from d-ribose with an isolated yield of 82%. This biohybrid was reusable over four cycles with no loss of enzymatic activity. The particular activity of free and immobilized TKgst in [BMIm][Cl] holds promise to extend the applications of TKgst in other ionic liquids and unusual media in biocatalysis.

Selective Hydrogenolysis of Glycerol to Propylene Glycol on Supported Pd Catalysts: Promoting Effects of ZnO and Mechanistic Assessment of Active PdZn Alloy Surfaces

Sun, Qianhui,Wang, Shuai,Liu, Haichao

, p. 4265 - 4275 (2017)

Pd catalysts have received increasing attention for selective hydrogenolysis of glycerol to propylene glycol because of their good hydrothermal stability and high selectivity for cleavage of C-O bonds over C-C bonds. Addition of Zn can facilitate glycerol hydrogenolysis to propylene glycol on Pd surface, but the promoting role of Zn, stability of the resulting active PdZn alloys and reaction mechanism remain largely unexplored. Here, we synthesized monoclinic zirconia-supported PdZn (PdZn/m-ZrO2) catalysts via an incipient wetness impregnation method. Glycerol hydrogenolysis turnover rates (normalized per surface Pd atom measured by H2 chemisorption) and propylene glycol selectivity on these PdZn/m-ZrO2 catalysts depended sensitively on their Zn/Pd molar ratios, and Zn leaching from the PdZn alloy phases led to deactivation of PdZn/m-ZrO2. Such deactivation was efficiently inhibited when physical mixtures of Pd/m-ZrO2 and ZnO were directly used in glycerol hydrogenolysis, leading to in situ formation of PdZn alloy layers on Pd surfaces with excellent stability and recyclability. Dependence of turnover rates on glycerol and H2 concentrations, combined with the primary kinetic isotope effects (kH/kD = 2.6 at 493 K), reveals the kinetically relevant step of glycerol hydrogenolysis involving the α-C-H cleavage in 2,3-dihydroxypropanoxide intermediate to glyceraldehyde on PdZn alloys and Pd. Measured rate constants show that the transition state of α-C-H cleavage is more stable because of the stronger oxophilicity of Zn on PdZn alloys than on Pd, which thus facilitates α-C-H cleavage of the Zn-bound intermediate by adjacent Pd on PdZn alloys. Such synergy between Zn and Pd sites accounts for the observed superiority of PdZn alloys to Pd in glycerol hydrogenolysis. (Chemical Equation Presented).

Vapour phase hydrogenolysis of glycerol over nano Ru/SBA-15 catalysts on the effect of preparatory routes and metal precursors

Pavankumar, Vanama,Srikanth, Chakravartula S.,Rao, Anipindi Nageswara,Chary, Komandur V. R.

, p. 3137 - 3146 (2014)

The effect of preparation method and metal precursor of ruthenium employed during the preparation of Ru/SBA-15 catalysts were investigated. The catalytic functionalities are evaluated during the vapour phase hydrogenolysis of glycerol to 1,2-propyleneglyc

-

Ciamician,Silber

, (1911)

-

Platinum on carbonaceous supports for glycerol hydrogenolysis: Support effect

Oberhauser, Werner,Evangelisti, Claudio,Jumde, Ravindra P.,Psaro, Rinaldo,Vizza, Francesco,Bevilacqua, Manuela,Filippi, Jonathan,Machado, Bruno F.,Serp, Philippe

, p. 111 - 117 (2015)

Metal vapor synthesis (MVS) technique was applied to generate Pt-nanoparticles of different size (1.3 nm and 2.5 nm) deposited onto carbonaceous supports, mainly characterized by a different surface area. The supported catalysts were employed in the glycerol hydrogenolysis reaction carried out under basic reaction conditions at 433 and 453 K to obtain 1,2-propanediol as the main liquid product. Comparison of the composition of the liquid- and gas-phase products obtained by the different catalysts showed a clear dependence of aqueous-phase reforming, water-gas shift reaction activity as well as 1,2-propanediol chemoselectivity on the degree of Pt-sintering occurring on different carbon supports. High-resolution transmission electron microscopic and X-ray powder diffraction studies carried out on as-synthesized and recovered heterogeneous catalysts provided clear evidences that a high surface area carbon support, such as Ketjen Black EC-600JD, notably retards nanoparticle aggregation.

-

Carnahan et al.

, p. 3766 (1955)

-

Effect of surface hydroxyl group of ultra-small silica on the chemical states of copper catalyst for dimethyl oxalate hydrogenation

Wang, Yue,Yang, Wenlong,Yao, Dawei,Wang, Shengping,Xu, Yan,Zhao, Yujun,Ma, Xinbin

, p. 127 - 135 (2020)

Cu/SiO2 catalyst prepared by ammonia evaporation method was reported to perform a great catalytic activity and selectivity in dimethyl oxalate (DMO) hydrogenation, which is one of the key steps in ethylene glycol (EG) synthesis from syngas. In recent years, significant advances have achieved on the nature of active sites and catalytic mechanism. However, the fabrication of Cu/SiO2 catalyst with controllable copper species remains challenging. Here, we reported a facile and effective approach to manipulate the surface hydroxyls of silica, which was revealed to be important factor for the formation of active species. An excellent linear correlation between surface hydroxyl groups of silica and the amount of Cu+ species was demonstrated, indicating that the formation of copper phyllosilicate can be kinetically favoured with increasing surface hydroxyls during preparation. Furthermore, as the copper phyllosilicate formation is enhanced, the specific surface area is significantly increased and the polymerization of copper hydroxide may be slow down, resulting in a highly improved dispersion of metallic copper as well. The enlarged surface areas of Cu0 and Cu+ species greatly enhanced the catalytic performance of Cu/SiO2 in DMO hydrogenation to EG. These understandings on the relationship between surface hydroxyl groups and chemical states of copper catalyst may lead to new possibilities in rational design of catalysts.

-

Milas,Sussman

, (1937)

-

Efficient hydrogenation of dimethyl oxalate to ethylene glycol: Via nickel stabilized copper catalysts

Zhu, Junhua,Ye, Yingchun,Tang, Yi,Chen, Liangfeng,Tang, Kangjian

, p. 111415 - 111420 (2016)

CuNi/SiO2 nanocatalysts with Ni-stabilized Cu nanoparticles of around 10 nm were synthesized. After H2 reduction, the catalysts with grain size of around 25 nm showed very high performance in the catalytic hydrogenation of dimethyl oxalate to ethylene glycol under mild reaction conditions. The composition and structure of these nanocatalysts were characterized. This study showed that Ni played a key role in stabilizing Cu against deactivation. To meet the requirements of industrial application, the optimal CuNi/SiO2 nanocatalyst was tested under continuous reaction for over 2000 hours. The conversion and product selectivity were maintained at 99% and above 95%, respectively.

Influence of Ni species on the structural evolution of Cu/SiO2 catalyst for the chemoselective hydrogenation of dimethyl oxalate

Yin, Anyuan,Wen, Chao,Guo, Xiaoyang,Dai, Wei-Lin,Fan, Kangnian

, p. 77 - 88 (2011)

A novel family of heterogeneous Cu-Ni/SiO2 catalysts with appropriate metal ratios displayed outstanding selectivity to methyl glycolate (96%) and to ethylene glycol (98%) in the chemoselective gas-phase hydrogenation of dimethyloxalate. The chemical states of nickel species were found to have a strong influence on the structural evolution of the catalysts and correspondent catalytic behaviors. The selectivity to the two products could be tuned by modulating the chemical states of nickel species. It is shown that oxidative nickel species are helpful in improving the dispersion of copper species because of the enrichment of copper on the surface of the nickel species, thus enhancing the catalytic activity and selectivity to ethylene glycol. The selectivity to methyl glycolate could be greatly improved by the Cu-Ni bimetallic catalyst. An 83% yield of methyl glycolate and a 98% yield of ethylene glycol could be obtained over the bimetallic Cu-Ni catalyst and the NiO-modified catalyst, respectively.

Utilizing in situ spectroscopic tools to monitor ketal deprotection processes

Ralbovsky, Nicole M.,Lomont, Justin P.,Ruccolo, Serge,Konietzko, Janelle,McHugh, Patrick M.,Wang, Sheng-Ching,Mangion, Ian,Smith, Joseph P.

, (2021/12/08)

The use of protection groups to shield a functional group during a synthesis is employed throughout many reactions and organic syntheses. The role of a protection group can be vital to the success of a reaction, as well as increase reaction yield and selectivity. Although much work has been done to investigate the addition of a protection group, the removal of the protection group is just as important – however, there is a lack of methods employed within the literature for monitoring the removal of a protection group in real time. In this work, the process of removing, or deprotecting, a ketal protecting group is investigated. Process analytical technology tools are incorporated for in situ analysis of the deprotection reaction of a small molecule model compound. Specifically, Raman spectroscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy show that characteristic bands can be used to track the decrease of the reactant and the increase of the expected products over time. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of process analytical technology being used to monitor a ketal deprotection reaction in real time. This information can be capitalized on in the future for understanding and optimizing pharmaceutically-relevant deprotection processes and downstream reactions.

Selectively chemo-catalytic hydrogenolysis of cellulose to EG and EtOH over porous SiO2 supported tungsten catalysts

Fan, Maohong,Mu, Shifang,Sun, Qi,Wang, Haiyong,Wang, Xiaolong,Wang, Yan,Weng, Yujing,Zhang, Mingwei,Zhang, Yulong

, (2022/03/15)

Cellulosic ethanol produced from lignocellulose biomass can alleviate the shortage of conventional fossil energy supply and reduce global CO2 emissions. Wherein, hydrogenolysis of cellulose to ethanol is a new method for the synthesis of fuel ethanol, which could theoretically utilizes all carbon atoms in glucose in the direct retro-aldol condensation (RAC) reaction to produce ethanol, and can potentially break through the technical bottleneck of biological methods. Herein, we show that the benefits of the mesoporous structure of tungsten-based catalysts can be leveraged to influence the selective hydrogenolysis of cellulose into C2 products. Comparing the performance of different pore size SiO2 supported tungsten catalysts and detailed characterizations revealed that the mesoporous structure of supports can affect the morphology, crystal sizes, and surface chemistry of the catalysts, which presented a combined effect on the hydrogenolysis reaction. Whereby, 51.5 wt% ethylene glycol (EG) was obtained from the direct hydrogenolysis of cellulose over Ru-WOx/SiO2 (500 ?) catalyst under 513 K, and 40.5 wt% ethanol (EtOH) was obtained from the direct hydrogenolysis of cellulose over Ir-WOx/SiO2 (500 ?) catalyst under 553 K, respectively.

Well-defined Cp*Co(III)-catalyzed Hydrogenation of Carbonates and Polycarbonates

Dahiya, Pardeep,Gangwar, Manoj Kumar,Sundararaju, Basker

, p. 934 - 939 (2020/12/15)

We herein report the catalytic hydrogenation of carbonates and polycarbonates into their corresponding diols/alcohols using well-defined, air-stable, high-valent cobalt complexes. Several novel Cp*Co(III) complexes bearing N,O-chelation were isolated for the first time and structurally characterized by various spectroscopic techniques including single crystal X-ray crystallography. These novel Co(III) complexes have shown excellent catalytic activity to produce value added diols/alcohols from carbonate and polycarbonates through hydrogenation using molecular hydrogen as sole reductant or iPrOH as transfer hydrogenation source. To demonstrate the developed methodology's practical applicability, we have recycled the bisphenol A monomer from compact disc (CD) through hydrogenation under the established reaction conditions using phosphine-free, earth-abundant, air- and moisture-stable high-valent cobalt catalysts.

Post a RFQ

Enter 15 to 2000 letters.Word count: 0 letters

Attach files(File Format: Jpeg, Jpg, Gif, Png, PDF, PPT, Zip, Rar,Word or Excel Maximum File Size: 3MB)

1

What can I do for you?
Get Best Price

Get Best Price for 107-21-1