It was conjectured that such receptors, if assembled, in a
continuous electronically coupled array, may allow the long-
range transport of a metal ion for the potentially interesting
applications in the emerging areas of molecular electronics
and nanotechnology.5
Unfortunately, neither 1 nor 2 is easily accessible nor
readily amenable to structural modifications for such appli-
cations.6 Therefore, we envisioned a structure with two
adjoined π-prismand-like (or ∆-shaped) cavities that can be
easily accessed using standard synthetic procedures (see
structure 3 in Scheme 1) and which would hold the potential
cavity, that it binds only a single silver cation which most
likely hops between the two adjoined cavities.8
The synthesis of 3 was accomplished in five steps (Scheme
1) using readily available starting materials in excellent
overall yield. Thus, following the procedure of Hart and co-
workers,9 a reaction of freshly prepared Grignard reagent
from protected 4-bromohexanophenone 5 (4 equiv) with 2,6-
dibromoiodobenzene9 in tetrahydrofuran at 22 °C for 24 h
followed by a quenching of the reaction mixture with iodine
at 0 °C afforded 2,6-diaryliodobenzene 6, in a one-pot
procedure, in 66% yield. The diaryliodobenzene 6 was
subjected to a Suzuki coupling reaction with 1,4-benzene-
diborate ester in refluxing dimethoxyethane in the presence
of aqueous sodium carbonate and a catalytic amount (2 mol
%) of Pd(PPh3)4 for 24 h.
Scheme 1. Synthetic Scheme for the Preparation of 3
The crude 7, from above, was hydrolyzed to the corre-
sponding tetraketone 8 in a 2:1 mixture of dichloromethane/
acetone containing 5% (v/v) conc. hydrochloric acid at 22
°C, and the resulting material was purified by column
chromatography to afford 8 in 68% overall yield in two steps.
The tetraketone 8, whose structure was confirmed by X-ray
crystallography, was then subjected to an intramolecular
(double) McMurry coupling under mild dilution to afford
the desired duplexiphane (3) in excellent yield (72%). The
1
molecular structure of 3 was easily established by H and
13C NMR spectroscopy and further confirmed by high-
resolution mass spectrometry (see the Supporting Informa-
tion).
The unequivocal structural confirmation of 3 was obtained
by X-ray crystallography as shown by an ORTEP diagram
and by a space-filling representation in Figure 2. A com-
to be readily tailored for incorporation into polymeric
structures or for the deposition onto various surfaces by
changing the “R” groups. Furthermore, the two electronically
coupled, ∆-shaped cavities in 3, which is referred to hereafter
as duplexiphane,7 will allow us to probe the fluxionality of
the silver cation in the [3, Ag+] complex.
Figure 2. Molecular structure of 3 shown as an ORTEP diagram
(left) and as a space-filling representation (right).
Thus, herein we will describe a versatile synthesis and
X-ray crystallographic structural characterization of duplex-
iphane (3) and delineate, with the aid of 1H NMR spectros-
copy and a model compound containing only one “∆”-shaped
parison of the geometrical parameters of 3 with 1 and 2
indicated that the size of the internal ∆-shaped cavity is
characteristically similar in all three compounds, i.e., an
average distance from its center to the centers of the three
benzene rings is ∼2.6 Å. Moreover, the two ∆-shaped
cavities in 3 are geometrically identical as the molecule
occupies a crystallographic center of symmetry. On the basis
of the structural similarity of the cavities in 3 with that of 1
and 2, one would advocate that it should bind Ag+ with more
or less similar efficiency as that of 1 and 2.
(4) (a) Pierre, J. L.; Baret, P.; Chautemps, P.; Armand, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1981, 103, 2986. (b) Kang, H. C.; Hanson, A. W.; Eaton, B.;
Boelelheide, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 1979. (c) Pierre, G.; Baret,
P.; Chautemps, P.; Pierre, J. L. Electrochim. Acta 1983, 28, 1269. (c)
Schmidbaur, H.; Hager, R.; Huber, B.; Muller, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1987, 26, 338. (d) Probst, T.; Steigelmann, O.; Riede, J.; Schmidbaur,
H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 1397.
(5) (a) Petty, M. C.; Bryce, M. R. In Introduction to Molecular
Electronics; Bloor, D., Ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, 1995.
(b) Maiya, B. G.; Ramasarma, T. Curr. Sci. 2001, 80, 1523.
(6) Compare: Heirtzler, F. R.; Hopf, H.; Jones, P. G.; Bubenitschek, P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 1239.
(8) For other examples of metal-ion hopping, see: (a) Ohseto, F.; Sakaki,
T.; Araki, K.; Shinkai, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 2149. (b) Walker, A.
V.; Tighe, T. B.; Cabarcos, O. M.; Reinard, M. D.; Haynie, B. C.; Uppili,
S.; Winograd, N.; Allara, D. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3954. (c)
Berg, D. J.; Sun, J.; Twamley, B. Chem. Commun. 2006, 4019.
(7) The term “duplexiphane” was coined based on the suggestion by
our colleague James R. Kincaid who pointed out that the structure of 3
conceptually resembles that of a “duplex”, a house partitioned to accom-
modate two residents.
(9) Du, C. J. F.; Hart, H.; Ng, K. K. D. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 3162.
390
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 3, 2008