Medicinal Chemistry Communications
Page 3 ofM6 edChemComm
Dynamic Article Links ►
DOI: 10.1039/C3MD00138E
Cite this: DOI: 10.1039/c0xx00000x
CONCISE ARTICLE
Therefore, a set of 21 substituted urea derivatives with different
functionalities at R1and R2 were synthesized and evaluated
with varying concentration of substrate IR5 (sequence from the
insulin receptor ß subunit domain provided in the kit) from 10 to
against protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B). The effect of 60 100µM. The Lineweaver-Burk double reciprocal plot in Fig. 2
the synthesized compounds on PTP1B was studied using
colorimetric, non-radioactive PTP1B drug discovery kit-BML-
AK 822 from Enzo Life Sciences, USA. The assay was done
according to the Kit protocol and first all the compounds were
shows intercept of all lines (obtained with 0µM, 5 µM, 10µM and
20µM compound 5b concentration) converging at y-axis (1/Vmax
), whereas slope and x-axis intercept (-1/Km ) vary with inhibitor
concentration which is a characteristic of competitive inhibition,
5
evaluated for PTP1B inhibition at 10 µM concentration. Further 65 therefore the evaluated compound 5b is a competitive inhibitor of
compounds showing more than 50% inhibition against PTP1B
10 were evaluated at five different concentrations to calculate their
IC50 value. Suramin was used as a reference standard.
PTP1B. The Km value for the IR5 substrate was determined
from the lineweaver burk plot shown in the Fig.2 and was found
81.4 μM. The Ki value was determined by plotting the slope
values vs [I]. The resulting secondary plot or "replot" have a Y-
70 axis intercept of Km/Vmax and a slope of Km/VmaxKi. The value of
Ki was calculated from intercept on X-axis of this replot and
found 7.88µM which is less than the IC50 of the substrate IR5
(85µM) indicating that the inhibitor binds the enzyme better than
the substrate.
The antidiabetic activity including PTP1B inhibitory
activities of the urea derivatives are presented in Table 1. It was
observed from the results that the substitution at R1 and R2
15 positions influenced the biological activity of the synthesized
analogues (4a-4k, 5a-5i). These compounds in general showed
enhanced PTP1B inhibitory activity in comparison to the
compounds with acetamide groups reported earlier.10 Initially the
variation at R1 position (region I, R1= H , 3-nitro) were performed
20 to derive structure activity relationship. Keeping R1 as H, a
systemic evaluation of R2 (region III) with different groups that
varied in size and polarity were explored (4a-4k). This series of
compounds with simple phenyl ring in region I was less active
than the series with 3-nitro group at R1 position in region I. The
25 compounds 4h, 4i and 4j with heterocyclic rings at R2 position
and R1 as H showed less activity with 31.2%, 21.4% and 19%
PTP1B inhibition respectively. The compounds 4a and 4d having
2-nitro and 2,6-dichloro-3,4-dimethoxyphenyl at R2 position
showed highly reduced activity with 2.10% and 13.7% PTP1B
30 inhibition. The compounds 4b, 4c, 4e and 4f also did not show
PTP1B inhibitory activity. However, the compounds 4g and 4k
having 2,4,6-trimethoxy phenyl group, and 4- acetamidophenyl
at R2 position showed good activity with 79.8% and 60.93%
PTP1B inhibition respectively. Interestingly, majority of
35 analogues with 3-nitro substituent at R1( region I) showed higher 75 Fig. 2 Competitive inhibitory profile of compound 5b
inhibitory activity as compared to the corresponding analogue(s)
with hydrogen. The compound 5b with 3-nitro substituent at R1
and 2-nitrophenyl at R2 ( region III) was the most active
Molecular modelling
compound of the series with 79.4% inhibition (IC50= 7.47 µM).
40 The compounds 5g, 5h, 5i, with heterocyclic rings substituted at
R2 position and 3-nitro group at R1 position exhibited moderate
In continuation of our earlier work where the docking studies was
successfully applied to elucidate essential structural requirements
15
for molecules acting on the same receptor/enzyme10-12,
we
activities (31- 68% inhibition; 5i, IC50= 8.06 µM) but better than 80 herein report the docking studies of the most active compound 5b
the compounds with R1 as H, while the presence of electron
releasing group at R2 position in compounds 5d, 5e, 5f proved
45 detrimental to the PTP1B inhibitory activity (2- 8% inhibition).
However, the compound 5a with 3-chlorophenyl group and the
compound 5c with 2,6-dichloro-3,4-dimethoxy phenyl group at
R2 position showed 33% and 56.9% PTP1B inhibition
respectively.
with the PTP1B enzyme active site to gain an insight and
understanding of the important interactions with the crucial
amino acid residues using the GOLD docking software.16
The binding pose analysis of the most active compound 5b
85 clearly provided rational explanation to its higher potency as
compared to the corresponding acetamide derivatives as
envisaged by us where the additional hydrogen bonding of both
the NH groups in the urea moiety in compound 5b with the
amidic oxygen of Gln262 was observed. The nitro group at 3-
90 position of phenyl ring in region I was also involved in hydrogen
bonding interaction with the active site residues Arg221, Asp181
and Ser216 providing the anchorage of this molecule into the
active site of PTP1B. These catalytic residues, Arg221 and
Asp181, also play a key role in the binding mode of the co-
95 crystallized ligand.17 (PDB ID-2F70; Fig.3) It is known that the
site B of PTP1B differs from that of TCPTP by a few amino acids
50 Kinetics Measurements and Mechanism of
Inhibition
Kinetics measurements and mechanism of inhibition was studied
using the PTP1B tyrosine phosphatase drug discovery kit BML
AK 822 from Enzo life science USA as used for the study of the
55 percentage inhibition. For determination of type of inhibition we
have performed the activity assay at different concentration of
0µM, 5 µM, 10µM and 20µM of the most active compound 5b
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry [year]
[journal], [year], [vol], 00–00 | 3